Literature DB >> 28360398

Nucleotide diversity and phylogenetic relationships among Gladiolus cultivars and related taxa of family Iridaceae.

Niraj Singh1, Baleshwar Meena, Ashish Kumar Pal, Roop Kumar Roy, Sri Krishna Tewari, Sushma Tamta, Tikam Singh Rana.   

Abstract

The plastid genome regions of two intergenic spacers, psbA-trnH and trnL-trnF, were sequenced to study the nucleotide diversity and phylogenetic relationships among Gladiolus cultivars. Nucleotide diversity of psbA-trnH region was higher than trnL-trnF region of chloroplast. We employed Bayesian, maximum parsimony (MP) and neighbour-joining (NJ) approaches for phylogenetic analysis of Gladiolus and related taxa using combined datasets from chloroplast genome. The psbA-trnH and trnL-trnF intergenic spacers of Gladiolus and related taxa-like Babiana, Chasmanthe, Crocus, Iris, Moraea, Sisyrinchium, Sparaxis and two out group species (Hymenocallis littoralis and Asphodeline lutea) were used in the present investigation. Results showed that subfamily Iridoideae have sister lineage with subfamily Ixioideae and Crocoideae. H. littoralis and A. lutea were separately attached at the base of tree as the diverging Iridaceae relative's lineage. Present study revealed that psbA-trnH region are useful in addressing questions of phylogenetic relationships among the Gladiolus cultivars, as these intergenic spacers are more variable and have more phylogenetically informative sites than the trnL-trnF spacer, and therefore, are suitable for phylogenetic comparison on a lower taxonomic level. Gladiolus cultivars are extensively used as an ornamental crop and showed high potential in floriculture trade. Gladiolus cultivation still needs to generate new cultivars with stable phenotypes. Moreover, one of the most popular methods for generating new cultivars is hybridization. Hence, information on phylogenetic relationships among cultivars could be useful for hybridization programmes for further improvement of the crop.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28360398     DOI: 10.1007/s12041-017-0755-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Genet        ISSN: 0022-1333            Impact factor:   1.166


  18 in total

1.  MUSCLE: multiple sequence alignment with high accuracy and high throughput.

Authors:  Robert C Edgar
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2004-03-19       Impact factor: 16.971

2.  Bayesian phylogenetic analysis of combined data.

Authors:  Johan A A Nylander; Fredrik Ronquist; John P Huelsenbeck; José Luis Nieves-Aldrey
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 15.683

3.  AWTY (are we there yet?): a system for graphical exploration of MCMC convergence in Bayesian phylogenetics.

Authors:  Johan A A Nylander; James C Wilgenbusch; Dan L Warren; David L Swofford
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2007-08-30       Impact factor: 6.937

4.  MEGA6: Molecular Evolutionary Genetics Analysis version 6.0.

Authors:  Koichiro Tamura; Glen Stecher; Daniel Peterson; Alan Filipski; Sudhir Kumar
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2013-10-16       Impact factor: 16.240

5.  jModelTest: phylogenetic model averaging.

Authors:  David Posada
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2008-04-08       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Molecular systematics of Iridaceae: evidence from four plastid DNA regions.

Authors:  G Reeves; M W Chase; P Goldblatt; P Rudall; M F Fay; A V Cox; B Lejeune; T Souza-Chies
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2001-11       Impact factor: 3.844

7.  The general stochastic model of nucleotide substitution.

Authors:  F Rodríguez; J L Oliver; A Marín; J R Medina
Journal:  J Theor Biol       Date:  1990-02-22       Impact factor: 2.691

8.  Mathematical model for studying genetic variation in terms of restriction endonucleases.

Authors:  M Nei; W H Li
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  1979-10       Impact factor: 11.205

9.  Distinct geographic structure as evidenced by chloroplast DNA haplotypes and ploidy level in Japanese Aucuba (Aucubaceae).

Authors:  Tetsuo Ohi; Tadashi Kajita; Jin Murata
Journal:  Am J Bot       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 3.844

Review 10.  Why are most organelle genomes transmitted maternally?

Authors:  Stephan Greiner; Johanna Sobanski; Ralph Bock
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2014-10-10       Impact factor: 4.345

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.