Literature DB >> 28360172

Complete Genome Sequences of Two Escherichia coli Phages, vB_EcoM_ ESCO5 and vB_EcoM_ESCO13, Which Are Related to phAPEC8.

Angélina Trotereau1, Mathieu Gonnet1, Antoine Viardot1, Anne-Christine Lalmanach1, Rodrigo Guabiraba1, Nathalie Katy Chanteloup1, Catherine Schouler2.   

Abstract

We report here the complete genome sequences of two Myoviridae phages that infect various avian-pathogenic Escherichia coli strains and that are closely related to phage phAPEC8.
Copyright © 2017 Trotereau et al.

Entities:  

Year:  2017        PMID: 28360172      PMCID: PMC5374246          DOI: 10.1128/genomeA.01337-16

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Genome Announc


GENOME ANNOUNCEMENT

Phages are promising biocontrol agents for avian Escherichia coli infections (1–3). Coliphages vB_EcoM_ESCO5 and vB_EcoM_ESCO13 were isolated in France in 2015 from the cecal contents of a ROSS PM3 chicken and a water sample from a sewage treatment plant, respectively. They were isolated by propagation on the avian-pathogenic E. coli strains BEN5202 of serogroup O2:K1 and BEN4311 of serogroup O1:K1, respectively. They both exhibited a broad host range, since they were able to propagate on E. coli strains of various serogroups (O1, O2, O78, O88, O6, O8, O18, and O25), i.e., 32 and 27 out of 46 tested strains for ESCO5 and ESCO13, respectively. Negative staining of phages and transmission electron microscopic analysis showed that ESCO5 and ESCO13 belong to the Myoviridae family. One-step growth experiments were performed to determine the kinetic parameters on strain BEN3801 O18:K1 (4). Both phages had a latent phase of 15 min and a rise phase of 40 min. ESCO5 had a burst size of 135 and ESCO13 had a burst size of 42. Unlike ESCO5, ESCO13 is less able to adsorb well on BEN3801 (adsorption constants of 3.00 10-9 ml/min and 4.78 10-10 ml/min, respectively) and do not induce total lysis of the bacteria. DNA phage libraries were prepared with the Nextera kit (Illumina) and sequenced to 2 × 250 read length on a MiSeq system (Illumina) by the DNA Sequencing Facility of the University of Cambridge (UK). Reads were trimmed with Sickle and assembled with SPAdes 3.1.1 (5). Coding sequences (CDSs) were predicted and annotated using Prokka (6, 7). Gene products were controlled by protein similarity search using BlastP (UniProt) (8). ESCO5 and ESCO13 are DNA double-stranded phages with genome sizes of 149,312 bp and 149,813 bp, and their G+C contents are 39.1% and 38.9%, respectively. They are highly homologous to phage vB_EcoM_phAPEC8 (9). Two hundred seventy-five genes and 291 genes were predicted in the genomes of ESCO5 and ESCO13, respectively. They shared 249 genes with phage phAPEC8. Six, 10, and eight genes are specific for ESCO5, ESCO13, and phAPEC8, respectively, mostly of unknown function. Phages phAPEC8 and ESCO5 have in common a gene coding for endo-N-acetylneuraminidase, a gene that is not present in ESCO13. The endo-N-acetylneuraminidase is 96.7% identical to the endosialidase EndoN92, encoded by phage phi92 (10). EndoN92 is present on the phage particle and digests polysialic acid of the K1 capsule (11). ESCO5 and ESCO13 are not K1-dependent phages, since they are able to propagate on strains that are K1 negative (K1-neg), such as O78 and O88 strains. Thus, the K1 capsule is not their receptor, and the endosialidase probably allows ESCO5 to better reach its receptor when infecting E. coli K1 than ESCO13. No gene related to lysogeny, such as integrases or specific recombinases, was identified in the genomes of ESCO5 and ESCO13. Moreover, another phAPEC8-related phage was identified by metagenomics analysis from a commercial Russian phage cocktail which is constituted of at least 10 different phage genera (12). These data combined with broad host range of ESCO5 and ESCO13 reinforce their potential use as therapeutic agents.

Accession number(s).

The complete genome sequences of these two phages have been deposited in GenBank under the accession numbers KX664695 (ESCO5) and KX552041 (ESCO13).
  12 in total

1.  Prevention of Escherichia coli respiratory infection in broiler chickens with bacteriophage (SPR02).

Authors:  W E Huff; G R Huff; N C Rath; J M Balog; H Xie; P A Moore; A M Donoghue
Journal:  Poult Sci       Date:  2002-04       Impact factor: 3.352

2.  Safety analysis of a Russian phage cocktail: from metagenomic analysis to oral application in healthy human subjects.

Authors:  Shawna McCallin; Shafiqul Alam Sarker; Caroline Barretto; Shamima Sultana; Bernard Berger; Sayeda Huq; Lutz Krause; Rodrigo Bibiloni; Bertrand Schmitt; Gloria Reuteler; Harald Brüssow
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 3.616

3.  Complete genome sequence of the novel Escherichia coli phage phAPEC8.

Authors:  J Tsonos; E M Adriaenssens; J Klumpp; J-P Hernalsteens; R Lavigne; H De Greve
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-12       Impact factor: 5.103

4.  Prokka: rapid prokaryotic genome annotation.

Authors:  Torsten Seemann
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-18       Impact factor: 6.937

5.  A multivalent adsorption apparatus explains the broad host range of phage phi92: a comprehensive genomic and structural analysis.

Authors:  David Schwarzer; Falk F R Buettner; Christopher Browning; Sergey Nazarov; Wolfgang Rabsch; Andrea Bethe; Astrid Oberbeck; Valorie D Bowman; Katharina Stummeyer; Martina Mühlenhoff; Petr G Leiman; Rita Gerardy-Schahn
Journal:  J Virol       Date:  2012-07-11       Impact factor: 5.103

6.  Structure and biochemical characterization of bacteriophage phi92 endosialidase.

Authors:  David Schwarzer; Christopher Browning; Katharina Stummeyer; Astrid Oberbeck; Martina Mühlenhoff; Rita Gerardy-Schahn; Petr G Leiman
Journal:  Virology       Date:  2014-12-01       Impact factor: 3.616

7.  Bacteriophage treatment of a severe Escherichia coli respiratory infection in broiler chickens.

Authors:  W E Huff; G R Huff; N C Rath; J M Balog; A M Donoghue
Journal:  Avian Dis       Date:  2003 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 1.577

8.  THE GROWTH OF BACTERIOPHAGE.

Authors:  E L Ellis; M Delbrück
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1939-01-20       Impact factor: 4.086

9.  Orione, a web-based framework for NGS analysis in microbiology.

Authors:  Gianmauro Cuccuru; Massimiliano Orsini; Andrea Pinna; Andrea Sbardellati; Nicola Soranzo; Antonella Travaglione; Paolo Uva; Gianluigi Zanetti; Giorgio Fotia
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2014-03-10       Impact factor: 6.937

10.  The Galaxy platform for accessible, reproducible and collaborative biomedical analyses: 2016 update.

Authors:  Enis Afgan; Dannon Baker; Marius van den Beek; Daniel Blankenberg; Dave Bouvier; Martin Čech; John Chilton; Dave Clements; Nate Coraor; Carl Eberhard; Björn Grüning; Aysam Guerler; Jennifer Hillman-Jackson; Greg Von Kuster; Eric Rasche; Nicola Soranzo; Nitesh Turaga; James Taylor; Anton Nekrutenko; Jeremy Goecks
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-05-02       Impact factor: 16.971

View more
  1 in total

1.  Riding the wave of genomics to investigate aquatic coliphage diversity and activity.

Authors:  Slawomir Michniewski; Tamsin Redgwell; Aurelija Grigonyte; Branko Rihtman; Maria Aguilo-Ferretjans; Joseph Christie-Oleza; Eleanor Jameson; David J Scanlan; Andrew D Millard
Journal:  Environ Microbiol       Date:  2019-04-04       Impact factor: 5.491

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.