Literature DB >> 28359571

Achilles tendon stress is more sensitive to subject-specific geometry than subject-specific material properties: A finite element analysis.

Wencke Hansen1, Vickie B Shim2, Steven Obst3, David G Lloyd4, Richard Newsham-West3, Rod S Barrett3.   

Abstract

This study used subject-specific measures of three-dimensional (3D) free Achilles tendon geometry in conjunction with a finite element method to investigate the effect of variation in subject-specific geometry and subject-specific material properties on tendon stress during submaximal isometric loading. Achilles tendons of eight participants (Aged 25-35years) were scanned with freehand 3D ultrasound at rest and during a 70% maximum voluntary isometric contraction. Ultrasound images were segmented, volume rendered and transformed into subject-specific 3D finite element meshes. The mean (±SD) lengths, volumes and cross-sectional areas of the tendons at rest were 62±13mm, 3617±984mm3 and 58±11mm2 respectively. The measured tendon strain at 70% MVIC was 5.9±1.3%. Subject-specific material properties were obtained using an optimisation approach that minimised the difference between measured and modelled longitudinal free tendon strain. Generic geometry was represented by the average mesh and generic material properties were taken from the literature. Local stresses were subsequently computed for combinations of subject-specific and generic geometry and material properties. For a given geometry, changing from generic to subject-specific material properties had little effect on the stress distribution in the tendon. In contrast, changing from generic to subject-specific geometry had a 26-fold greater effect on tendon stress distribution. Overall, these findings indicate that the stress distribution experienced by the living free Achilles tendon of a young and healthy population during voluntary loading are more sensitive to variation in tendon geometry than variation in tendon material properties.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Achilles tendon; Finite element modelling; Material properties; Morphology; Strain; Stress; Subject specificity

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28359571     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2017.02.031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  11 in total

1.  Loss of the knee-ankle coupling and unrecognized elongation in Achilles tendon rupture: effects of differential elongation of the gastrocnemius tendon.

Authors:  Susanne Olesen Schaarup; Eva Wetke; Lars Aage Glud Konradsen; James David Forbes Calder
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-30       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Achilles Tendon Resting Angle Relates to Tendon Length and Function.

Authors:  Jennifer A Zellers; Michael R Carmont; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Foot Ankle Int       Date:  2017-12-22       Impact factor: 2.827

3.  Achilles tendon cross-sectional area at 12 weeks post-rupture relates to 1-year heel-rise height.

Authors:  Jennifer A Zellers; Ryan T Pohlig; Daniel H Cortes; Karin Grävare Silbernagel
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2019-07-02       Impact factor: 4.342

4.  Subject-Specific 3D Models to Investigate the Influence of Rehabilitation Exercises and the Twisted Structure on Achilles Tendon Strains.

Authors:  Alessia Funaro; Vickie Shim; Marion Crouzier; Ine Mylle; Benedicte Vanwanseele
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2022-07-06

Review 5.  Bioinspired Technologies to Connect Musculoskeletal Mechanobiology to the Person for Training and Rehabilitation.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; David G Lloyd; Rod S Barrett; Jill L Cook; Ming H Zheng; Thor F Besier; David J Saxby
Journal:  Front Comput Neurosci       Date:  2017-10-18       Impact factor: 2.380

6.  Combining in silico and in vitro experiments to characterize the role of fascicle twist in the Achilles tendon.

Authors:  Vickie B Shim; Geoff G Handsfield; Justin W Fernandez; David G Lloyd; Thor F Besier
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

Review 7.  Neuromusculoskeletal Modeling-Based Prostheses for Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury.

Authors:  Claudio Pizzolato; David J Saxby; Dinesh Palipana; Laura E Diamond; Rod S Barrett; Yang D Teng; David G Lloyd
Journal:  Front Neurorobot       Date:  2019-12-02       Impact factor: 2.650

8.  A 3D Scanning System for Inverse Analysis of Moist Biological Samples: Design and Validation Using Tendon Fascicle Bundles.

Authors:  Sylwia Dabrowska; Martyna Ekiert; Kaja Wojcik; Marek Kalemba; Andrzej Mlyniec
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-07-10       Impact factor: 3.576

9.  Achilles Subtendon Structure and Behavior as Evidenced From Tendon Imaging and Computational Modeling.

Authors:  Geoffrey G Handsfield; Joachim Greiner; Josef Madl; Eva A Rog-Zielinska; Enzo Hollville; Benedicte Vanwanseele; Vickie Shim
Journal:  Front Sports Act Living       Date:  2020-06-23

10.  The effects of growth on structural properties of the Achilles and Patellar tendons: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Yasuyoshi Mogi
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2020-08
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.