| Literature DB >> 28357691 |
E Vessally1, F Behmagham2, B Massuomi2, A Hosseinian3, K Nejati4.
Abstract
The electronic sensitivity and adsorption behavior towardEntities:
Keywords: Boron nitride; DFT; Electronic properties; Gas sensor; Nanostructure
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28357691 PMCID: PMC5371637 DOI: 10.1007/s00894-017-3312-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Mol Model ISSN: 0948-5023 Impact factor: 1.810
Fig. 1a Optimized structure, b density of states, c HOMO, and d LUMO profiles of the pristine B12N12 nanocluster. Distances in Å. The E g indicates the HOMO–LUMO energy gap. e Calculated electrostatic potential on the molecular surface of B12N12. Color ranges, in kcal mol−1: red greater than 15, yellow between 15 and 5, green between 5 and −5, blue less than −5 (negative)
Fig. 2Optimized structures of X–CN/B12N12 complexes. Distances in Å
Adsorption energy (E ad, kJ mol−1), change of enthalpy (∆Had kJ mol−1) for different cyanogen halides (X–CN; X = F, Cl, and Br) adsorption on the B12N12 nanocages. Vibrational frequencies and bond lengths of C–N and C–X bonds of cyanogen halides in different complexes. The numbers in parentheses are values for the free molecule. Complexes are shown in Fig. 2
| Complex |
| ∆Had | υC–N (cm−1) | υC–X (cm−1) | RC–N (Å) | RC–X (Å) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| −8.7 | −6.6 | 2427 (2429) | 1094 (1098) | 1.161 (1.161) | 1.273 (1.273) |
|
| −9.2 | −7.5 | 2326 (2337) | 741 (742) | 1.163 (1.163) | 1.646 (1.646) |
|
| −10.8 | −8.7 | 2309 (2309) | 578 (580) | 1.163 (1.163) | 1.793 (1.793) |
|
| −24.2 | −19.2 | 2547 (2429) | 1173 (1098) | 1.148 (1.161) | 1.257 (1.273) |
|
| −29.6 | −23.4 | 2410 (2337) | 820 (742) | 1.152 (1.163) | 1.626 (1.646) |
|
| −35.1 | −30.5 | 2387 (2309) | 678 (580) | 1.152 (1.163) | 1.772 (1.793) |
Fig. 3Molecular surface electrostatic potential (MEP) of Br–CN, computed on the 0.001 au contour of the electronic density. Color ranges, in kcal mol−1, are: red greater than 15, yellow between 15 and 5, green between 5 and −5, blue less than −5 (negative). The σ-hole along the extension of the Br–C bond is shown in red
The energies of HOMO, LUMO, and HOMO−LUMO gap (E g) in eV for different structures. %∆E g indicates the change in E g after the adsorption process. Q is the calculated natural bond orbital (NBO) charge on the adsorbed X-CN (X = F, Cl, and Br) molecule. The complexes are shown in Fig. 2
| Structure |
|
|
| %∆ |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| B12N12 | −7.70 | −0.86 | 6.84 | - | - |
|
| −7.78 | −0.95 | 6.83 | −0.2 | 0.001 |
|
| −7.79 | −0.98 | 6.81 | −0.4 | 0.005 |
|
| −7.76 | −1.15 | 6.61 | −3.3 | 0.018 |
|
| −6.87 | −1.26 | 5.61 | −17.9 | 0.287 |
|
| −6.79 | −1.87 | 4.92 | −28.0 | 0.311 |
|
| −6.74 | −2.49 | 4.25 | −37.9 | 0.324 |
Fig. 4Density of states (DOS) plots of the different complexes shown in Fig. 2
Fig. 5Partial density of states (PDOS) of complex Br.2, and its HOMO and LUMO profiles