Literature DB >> 28356873

Silencing of LncRNA HULC Enhances Chemotherapy Induced Apoptosis in Human Gastric Cancer.

Yifei Zhang1, Xiaojing Song2, Xixun Wang1, Jinchen Hu1, Lixin Jiang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most common cancers in the world; however, chemoresistance greatly decreases the efficacy of therapy in gastric cancer. Long noncoding RNAs (IncRNAs) participate in a variety of biological processes, and we hypothesize that lncRNA HULC regulates the multidrug resistance in GC treatment.
METHODS: We obtained GC tissue samples from 42 GC patients and detected the expression level of HULC in the plasma and tissues via qRT-PCR. The relationship between HULC expression and survival rate was confirmed by Kaplan-Meier survival analysis. We verified the expression of HULC in GC cell lines via qRT-PCR, and the function of HULC was detected via flow cytometry assay and CCK-8 assay.
RESULTS: HULC was highly expressed in the plasma and tissues of the GC patients compared with controls, with HULC high expression indicating lower survival rate. HULC knockdown enhanced cisplatin-induced apoptosis in GC cells.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that silencing lncRNA HULC could enhance chemotherapy induced apoptosis in GC cells, which could provide a novel approach for therapeutic strategies.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HULC; LncRNA; gastric cancer; multidrug resistance

Year:  2016        PMID: 28356873      PMCID: PMC5346790          DOI: 10.1515/jomb-2015-0016

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Med Biochem        ISSN: 1452-8266            Impact factor:   3.402


Introduction

Gastric cancer is one most common cancers in the world (1), and chemotherapy is an important strategy against gastric cancer (2). Because multiple chemotherapeutic drugs are used to treat gastric cancer, the sensitivity of anticancer drugs to gastric cancer gradually decreases allowing resistance to many different drugs with various chemical structures and mechanisms of action to occur. This type of chemoresistance has remarkably decreased the efficacy of therapy in gastric cancer. Chemoresistance is becoming a major problem for the successful treatment of gastric cancer (3). LncRNAs, abundantly transcribed by the mammalian genome, range in size from 200 to 10,000 nucleotides (4, 5). LncRNAs are misregulated in a wide range of human diseases and disorders, including various types of cancer. For example, increased expression of the lncRNA MALAT-1 indicates poorer prognosis in patients with lung cancer (6). LncRNAs PCGEM (7) and DD3 (8) are overexpressed in prostate cancer tissues and both lncRNAs are involved in prostate tumorigenesis (9). BC200RNA overexpression is correlated with the progression of breast tumors and proposed as a potential novel biomarker for breast cancer (10). Taken together, these observations provide evidence and support for the potential roles of lncRNAs in tumor development and progression. Highly upregulated in liver cancer (HULC) was first confirmed from a hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC)-specific gene library as a novel lncRNA. HULC is aberrantly expressed (11, 12) and associated with the molecular pathogenesis of HCC (13), and its potential as a diagnostic biomarker has been proposed (14, 15). However, the role of HULC expression in patients with gastric cancer (GC) has not been examined. In addition, the function of HULC in GC MDR remains unclear. In this study, we confirmed that lncRNA HULC is present in the plasma of GC patients and the plasma HULC level is correlated with the overall 5-year survival rate in GC patients. The expression level of HULC was greatly elevated in GC tumor tissues compared with the control group, and the expression level of HULC was associated with the degree of malignancy in GC cell lines. The significance of our study is to reveal that silencing of lncRNA HULC enhances chemotherapy sensitivity in GC cells, and this novel finding would shed light on developing new therapy strategies for GC cancer.

Materials and Methods

Patients and clinical specimens

This study was approved by the institutional review board of Qingdao University Medical College. GC tissue samples from 42 GC patients were obtained from Department of Thyroid Surgery in Gastrointestinal Surgery, the Affiliated Yantai Yuhu-angding Hospital of Qingdao University Medical College. Informed consents were signed by all subjects enrolled in this study. Subjects were recruited between Sep. 2006 and Sep. 2009, and patients with other known tumors and those receiving medical therapy and/or previous cancer therapies were excluded from the study. Plasma samples were obtained from 42 GC patients and 25 volunteers and stored in Eppendorf tubes. Plasma was collected and centrifuged using FitAmp Plasma/Serum DNA Isolation Kit (Epigentek Group Inc., USA) according to the manufacturer′s instructions and stored at -80 °C.

Cell culture

The normal gastric epithelial cells GES-1, and human gastric adenocarcinoma MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells were purchased from Beijing Zhongyuan Ltd, China. All cells were cultured in high glucose DMEM medium supplemented with 10% FBS and antibiotics (100 U/mL penicillin and streptomycin) with 5% CO2 in a humidified incubator at 37 °C.

Drugs

Cisdiamminedichloroplatinum (CDDP) (Qilu Pharmo Co. Ltd, China) was resuspended in phosphate-buffered saline (PBS) (1 mg/mL) and stored at -20 °C. Adriamycin (ADR) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was diluted in PBS (2 mg/mL). 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) (Sigma-Aldrich, USA) was added to the solution (25 mg/mL) and stored at room temperature. The GC cells were treated with 2, 4, 6, 8, 10 μg/mL of CDDP or 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8, 1 mg/mL of ADR, or 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 μg/mL of 5-FU for 48 hours then applied to designed analysis.

RNA Extraction and qRT-PCR

Total RNA from 1 mL plasma was extracted using Trizol (Invitrogen) according to the manufacturer′s instructions. Reverse transcription was performed using random primers (AUGCT Biotech, Beijing, China). Real-time PCR was carried out in an Applied Biosystems 7300 system using Power SYBR Green PCR master mix (Applied Biosystems). Relative levels of gene expression were determined using 18S rRNA as the control. The DCt value was defined as DCt=CtHUCL - Ct18S, and a lower DCt value implied a higher expression. The primers for 18S rRNA are forward, 5′- AGGATCCATTGGAGGGCAAGT -3′; reverse, 5′- TCCAACTACGAGCTTTTTAACTGCA -3′. The primers for HULC are forward, 5′- TCATGATGGAATTGGAGCCTT -3′; reverse, 5′- CTCTTCCTGGCTTGCAGATTG -3′.

siRNA transfection

The siRNA specially targeting HULC (siHULC) and the scramble siRNA (siCon) were both purchased from RiboBio (Ribo, China), which were chemically synthesized fragments. Transfection was carried out according to the manufacturer′s protocol with Lipofectamine 2000 (Life Science, NY, USA). The sequence of siHULC was as follows: S, 5′-CCGGAAUAUUCUUUGUUUAUU-3′; AS, 5′-UAAACAAAGAAUAUUCCGGUU-3′; the sequence of siCon was as follows: 5′-CCUUAUAUGUUCUGGAAUUUU-3′; AS, 5′-UAAAACGAAUGGAAUUCACUU-3′.

Flow cytometry of apoptosis

After treatment, the cells were harvested by trypsin-EDTA solution to produce single cell suspension. Annexin-V and PI double staining kit (Biosea Biotech, Beijing, China) was used to assess apoptosis. The cells were analyzed by flow cytometry. Apoptotic cells were localized in the lower right quadrant and upper right quadrant of a dot-plot graph using annexin-V-fluorescein and PI.

Chemotherapeutic drugs sensitivity analysis

MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells (2 x 103 cells/ well) were seeded in 96-well plates and treated with different drugs including CDDP, ADR and 5-FU in different concentrations for 48 h. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8, Dojindo, Japan) was added into each well. After 4 h incubation at 37 °C, the coloring reaction was quantified by an automatic plate reader (BIOTEK, USA). Growth inhibitory effects were calculated and the chemotherapeutic drugs sensitivity was evaluated by IC50 parameter (inhibitory concentration of 50% cells).

Statistical analysis

All data are expressed as the mean ± standard deviation. SPSS software version 18.0 (SPSS, Inc., Chicago, IL, USA) was used for statistical analyses. The differences between groups were evaluated using the Student-Newman-Keuls test. P<0.05 was considered to indicate a statistically significant difference.

Results

The expression levels of plasma HULC were increased in GC patients

To examine the correlation between the expression levels of plasma HULC and clinicopathologic factors in GC, 42 patient cases were statistically analyzed. We observed that the expression of HULC increased significantly in GC patients compared with healthy volunteers (p<0.05) by qRT-PCR (). Among them, we observed a stratification of the patient samples - the high expression group, 22 samples, showed more than two-fold up-regulation of HULC compared with that in plasma of healthy volunteers, while the remaining 20 samples were classified as the low expression group. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis of the stratified GC patient samples showed the patient survival time in HULC high expression group (n = 22) was significantly shorter than in the low expression group (n = 20) (p< 0.05) (), indicating the potential for HULC to be used as a biomarker in patients with GC.
Figure 1

The expression levels of plasma HULC were increased in GC patients.

(A) The expression levels of plasma HULC in 42 GC cases and 25 healthy volunteers were detected by qRT-PCR assay as indicated by the box plot ranges. The line indicates the average, whereas the whiskers are the standard deviations. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed that higher plasma HULC levels result in a decreased overall 5-year survival rate.

Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

The expression levels of plasma HULC were increased in GC patients. (A) The expression levels of plasma HULC in 42 GC cases and 25 healthy volunteers were detected by qRT-PCR assay as indicated by the box plot ranges. The line indicates the average, whereas the whiskers are the standard deviations. (B) Kaplan-Meier survival analysis confirmed that higher plasma HULC levels result in a decreased overall 5-year survival rate. Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

The expression levels of HULC were elevated in GC tissues and GC cell lines

To explore the function of HULC in GC tissues, we first analyzed the expression level of HULC via qRT-PCR. We observed that the expression of HULC was remarkably elevated in GC tissue samples compared with the matched paracancer tissues (p< 0.05) (). Furthermore, we compared HULC expression in human gastric adenocarcinoma MGC-803 and MKN-45 cell lines to normal gastric epithelial cells, GES-1, using qRT-PCR. We observed significant upregulation of HULC in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells compared with GES-1 cells, which suggested that HULC might exert its function in GC cells ().
Figure 2

The expression levels of HULC were elevated in GC tissues and GC cell lines.

(A) The expression level of HULC was verified in paracancer tissues and GC tissues via qRT-PCR as indicated by the box plot ranges. The line indicates the average, whereas the whiskers are the standard deviations. (B) The expression level of HULC was elevated in human gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803 and MKN-45, compared to wild-type gastric cell line, GES-1, by qRT-PCR.

Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

The expression levels of HULC were elevated in GC tissues and GC cell lines. (A) The expression level of HULC was verified in paracancer tissues and GC tissues via qRT-PCR as indicated by the box plot ranges. The line indicates the average, whereas the whiskers are the standard deviations. (B) The expression level of HULC was elevated in human gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803 and MKN-45, compared to wild-type gastric cell line, GES-1, by qRT-PCR. Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

HULC knockdown suppressed apoptosis in GC cells

To further determine the function of HULC in GC cells, MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells were transfected with HULC siRNA. The efficiency of HULC knockdown was confirmed via qRT-PCR assay in both cell lines (). To examine whether HULC knockdown in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells induced apoptosis, we double-stained the cells with Annexin V and PI. Additionally, MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells with HULC knockdown were treated with a low dose of CDDP (2 μg/mL) for 6 h. The results demonstrated that knockdown of HULC increased the percentage of MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells undergoing apoptosis respectively ().
Figure 3

HULC knockdown suppressed GC cells apoptosis.

(A) The efficiency of HULC knockdown was confirmed via qRT-PCR in two independent human gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803 and MKN-45. (B) Flow cytometry detected the apoptosis rate using double-staining with Annexin V and PI in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells exposed to CDDP.

Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

HULC knockdown suppressed GC cells apoptosis. (A) The efficiency of HULC knockdown was confirmed via qRT-PCR in two independent human gastric cancer cell lines, MGC-803 and MKN-45. (B) Flow cytometry detected the apoptosis rate using double-staining with Annexin V and PI in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells exposed to CDDP. Each experiment was repeated at least three times using independent biological replicates. *, p<0.05 compared with control.

HULC knockdown enhanced the sensitivity of GC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs

The pro-apoptotic effect of HULC knockdown on GC cells prompted us to speculate that it may also contribute to the drug resistance of GC cells. To test this hypothesis, we assayed chemosensitivity to three common chemotherapy drugs: CDDP, ADR, and 5-FU. To analyze the influence of HULC on chemoresistance, we compared HULC knockdown cells (siHULC) to the non-targeting control group (siCon), and the untransfected cells (Empty). We observed that HULC knockdown in both MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells significantly decreased the IC50 values of CDDP, ADR, and 5-FU (). Therefore, we concluded that HULC knockdown contributes to the sensitivity of GC cells to chemotherapeutic drugs.
Table I

TIC50 values in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells to different drugs.

Cell lineGroupCDDP (mg/mL)ADR (mg/mL)5-FU (mg/mL)
MGC-803Empty4.56±0.410.44±0.057.84±0.94
siCon4.75±0.480.41±0.047.69±0.88
siHULC2.75±0.31**0.25±0.03*3.56±0.59**
MKN-45Empty3.52±0.180.69±0.088.43±1.21
siCon3.94±0.210.74±0.098.13±0.95
siHULC1.94±0.11**0.41±0.05**6.63±0.77*

Note: siCon group and siHULC group were compared with untransfected cells.

Each experiment was repeated in triplicate at least three times.

p<0.05 compared with control;

p<0.01 compared with control.

TIC50 values in MGC-803 and MKN-45 cells to different drugs. Note: siCon group and siHULC group were compared with untransfected cells. Each experiment was repeated in triplicate at least three times. p<0.05 compared with control; p<0.01 compared with control.

Discussion

Gastric carcinoma is one of the most commonly occurring malignancies in humans, with a high incidence in China. While surgical resection remains the main treatment approach, chemotherapy is occasionally useful in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma. However, the effectiveness of chemotherapy is often hindered by simultaneous resistance of tumor cells to a variety of cytotoxic drugs, known as chemoresistance. Until now, chemoresistance remains a major obstacle to successful gastric cancer chemotherapy in the clinic (16). The exact molecular mechanisms behind chemoresistance remain unclear. To improve the efficiency of GC treatment, the reversal of chemoresistance and enhancing the sensitivity of tumor cells to chemotherapeutic agents are very important aspects of GC therapy. The molecular basis of resistance to cancer therapeutics is generally complex, involving multiple processes such as drug metabolism and transport, apoptosis, and DNA repair (17–19). However, other mechanisms are also involved in the development of MDR in tumor cells, and exhibit chemotherapy-related effects, including the activation of detoxifying systems, the change in drug targets, alterations in cell cycle control and the interruption of signaling pathways (20). However, whether other lncRNAs are related to chemoresistance remains to be investigated. Only 2% of RNAs encode proteins in human cells. Since the large majority is not translated, noncoding RNAs (ncRNAs) still play important roles in regulating transcriptional and non-transcriptional processes (21). ncRNAs consist of microRNAs, small interfering RNAs, and long noncoding RNAs (lncRNAs). LncRNAs are eukaryotic RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides, with no coding capacity. Altered lncRNA expression has been associated with the development of cancer and other diseases (22). Furthermore, several lncRNAs have shown promise as cancer biomarkers and potential therapeutic targets in several cancer subtypes (23, 24). Wang et al. (25) reported that a lncRNA MRUL (MDR-related and upregulated lncRNA) was significantly upregulated in two multidrug-resistant GC cell sublines, SGC7901/ADR and SGC7901/VCR. Their findings indicated that MRUL promotes ABCB1 (ATP-binding cassette, subfamily B, member 1) expression and is a potential target to reverse the multidrug resistance phenotype of GC cell sublines. LncRNA HULC was first found in 2007 (13) and is reported to modulate abnormal lipid metabolism in hepatoma cells through a miR-9-mediated RXRA signaling pathway (26). Additionally, the elevation of HULC by hepatitis B virus X protein promotes hepatoma cell proliferation via down-regulating p18 (27) and HULC is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer (28). An up-to-date study by Zhao et al. (29) discovered that HULC may play an important role in the growth and tumorigenesis of human GC by activating autophagy, and silencing of HULC effectively reversed the epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT) phenotype. All these evidence point to lncRNA HULC as an important molecule in gastric tumorigenesis and survival. In the current paper, we identified that HULC is differentially expressed in the tissues and plasma of GC patients compared with those of controls. Knockdown of HULC using specific siRNA enhances the apoptosis rate in GC cells treated with CDDP, which indicates that HULC is potentially implicated in GC chemoresistance including CDDP, ADR, and 5′-FU. Taken together, our results provide new evidence for lncRNA-mediated regulation of chemoresistance in GC, which has potential for novel therapeutic strategies.
  27 in total

Review 1.  Growth factor signaling and resistance to cancer chemotherapy.

Authors:  Zunyan Dai; Ying Huang; Wolfgang Sadée
Journal:  Curr Top Med Chem       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  Long noncoding RNAs: functional surprises from the RNA world.

Authors:  Jeremy E Wilusz; Hongjae Sunwoo; David L Spector
Journal:  Genes Dev       Date:  2009-07-01       Impact factor: 11.361

3.  Long noncoding RNA MRUL promotes ABCB1 expression in multidrug-resistant gastric cancer cell sublines.

Authors:  Ying Wang; Dexin Zhang; Kaichun Wu; Qingchuan Zhao; Yongzhan Nie; Daiming Fan
Journal:  Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-06-23       Impact factor: 4.272

4.  Long non-coding RNA Loc554202 regulates proliferation and migration in breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Yongguo Shi; Jianwei Lu; Jing Zhou; Xueming Tan; Ye He; Jie Ding; Yun Tian; Li Wang; Keming Wang
Journal:  Biochem Biophys Res Commun       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 3.575

5.  Characterization of HULC, a novel gene with striking up-regulation in hepatocellular carcinoma, as noncoding RNA.

Authors:  Katrin Panzitt; Marisa M O Tschernatsch; Christian Guelly; Tarek Moustafa; Martin Stradner; Heimo M Strohmaier; Charles R Buck; Helmut Denk; Renée Schroeder; Michael Trauner; Kurt Zatloukal
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2006-08-14       Impact factor: 22.682

6.  PCGEM1, a prostate-specific gene, is overexpressed in prostate cancer.

Authors:  V Srikantan; Z Zou; G Petrovics; L Xu; M Augustus; L Davis; J R Livezey; T Connell; I A Sesterhenn; K Yoshino; G S Buzard; F K Mostofi; D G McLeod; J W Moul; S Srivastava
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2000-10-24       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Estimates of the worldwide incidence of 25 major cancers in 1990.

Authors:  D M Parkin; P Pisani; J Ferlay
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  1999-03-15       Impact factor: 7.396

8.  Long noncoding RNA HULC is a novel biomarker of poor prognosis in patients with pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Wei Peng; Wei Gao; Jifeng Feng
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.064

9.  DD3: a new prostate-specific gene, highly overexpressed in prostate cancer.

Authors:  M J Bussemakers; A van Bokhoven; G W Verhaegh; F P Smit; H F Karthaus; J A Schalken; F M Debruyne; N Ru; W B Isaacs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  1999-12-01       Impact factor: 12.701

10.  Salivary microRNA: discovery, characterization, and clinical utility for oral cancer detection.

Authors:  Noh Jin Park; Hui Zhou; David Elashoff; Bradley S Henson; Dragana A Kastratovic; Elliot Abemayor; David T Wong
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2009-08-25       Impact factor: 12.531

View more
  34 in total

1.  CCDC26 knockdown enhances resistance of gastrointestinal stromal tumor cells to imatinib by interacting with c-KIT.

Authors:  Ke Cao; Minhuan Li; Ji Miao; Xiaofeng Lu; Xing Kang; Hao Zhu; Shangce Du; Xue Li; Qian Zhang; Wenxian Guan; Ying Dong; Xuefeng Xia
Journal:  Am J Transl Res       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.060

2.  METase/lncRNA HULC/FoxM1 reduced cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer by suppressing autophagy.

Authors:  Lin Xin; Qi Zhou; Yi-Wu Yuan; Li-Qiang Zhou; Li Liu; Shi-Hao Li; Chuan Liu
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-09-04       Impact factor: 4.553

3.  The role of long non-coding RNAs in mediating chemoresistance by modulating autophagy in cancer.

Authors:  Ke-Tao Jin; Ze-Bei Lu; Jie-Qing Lv; Jun-Gang Zhang
Journal:  RNA Biol       Date:  2020-03-15       Impact factor: 4.652

Review 4.  Research updates on the clinical implication of long noncoding RNA in digestive system cancers and chemoresistance.

Authors:  Xinzhi Miao; Fang Wang; Tianyun Wang; Siti Razila Abdul Razak; Muhammad Amir Yunus; Ida Shazrina Ismail
Journal:  3 Biotech       Date:  2021-09-01       Impact factor: 2.893

5.  HCP5 contributes to cisplatin resistance in gastric cancer through miR-128/HMGA2 axis.

Authors:  Liqun Liang; Hongchun Kang; Junmei Jia
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2021-05-16       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 6.  Emerging role of long non-coding RNAs in cisplatin resistance.

Authors:  Yang Hu; Qiong-Ni Zhu; Jun-Li Deng; Zhi-Xing Li; Guo Wang; Yuan-Shan Zhu
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 4.147

7.  The Long Noncoding RNA D63785 Regulates Chemotherapy Sensitivity in Human Gastric Cancer by Targeting miR-422a.

Authors:  Zhixia Zhou; Zhijuan Lin; Yuqi He; Xin Pang; Yin Wang; Murugavel Ponnusamy; Xiang Ao; Peipei Shan; Muhammad Akram Tariq; Peifeng Li; Jianxun Wang
Journal:  Mol Ther Nucleic Acids       Date:  2018-07-05       Impact factor: 8.886

8.  Effect of long non-coding RNA highly up-regulated in liver cancer (HULC) on the prognosis of cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yong Li; Yi-Hong Liu; Xian Chen; Yan-Juan Zhu; Hai-Bo Zhang; Yan Li; Jian-Ping Bai; Li-Rong Liu; Yan-Chun Qu; Xin Qu
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-06-13

9.  AlncRNA HULC as an effective biomarker for surveillance of the outcome of cancer: A meta-analysis.

Authors:  Xiaoliang Chen; Jinbo Lin; Yi Liu; Ji Peng; Yong Cao; Zhan Su; Tieqiang Wang; Jinquan Cheng; Dongsheng Hu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-02-01       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 10.  Long Non-Coding RNAs: Key Regulators of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition, Tumour Drug Resistance and Cancer Stem Cells.

Authors:  Richard Heery; Stephen P Finn; Sinead Cuffe; Steven G Gray
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2017-04-21       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.