| Literature DB >> 28353633 |
Sheng Lin1,2, Erin P McCauley3, Nicholas Lorig-Roach4, Karen Tenney5, Cassandra N Naphen6, Ai-Mei Yang7,8, Tyler A Johnson9, Thalia Hernadez10, Ramandeep Rattan11, Frederick A Valeriote12, Phillip Crews13.
Abstract
This study began with the goal of identifying constituents from <span class="Species">Zyzzya fuliginosa extracts that showed selectivity in our primary <span class="Disease">cytotoxicity screen against the PANC-1 tumor cell line. During the course of this project, which focused on six Z. fuliginosa samples collected from various regions of the Indo-Pacific, known compounds were obtained consisting of nine makaluvamine and three damirone analogues. Four new acetylated derivatives were also prepared. High-accuracy electrospray ionization mass spectrometry (HAESI-MS) m/z ions produced through MS² runs were obtained and interpreted to provide a rapid way for dereplicating isomers containing a pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline core. In vitro human pancreas/duct epithelioid carcinoma (PANC-1) cell line IC50 data was obtained for 16 compounds and two therapeutic standards. These results along with data gleaned from the literature provided useful structure activity relationship conclusions. Three structural motifs proved to be important in maximizing potency against PANC-1: (i) conjugation within the core of the ABC-ring; (ii) the presence of a positive charge in the C-ring; and (iii) inclusion of a 4-ethyl phenol or 4-ethyl phenol acetate substituent off the B-ring. Two compounds, makaluvamine J (9) and 15-O-acetyl makaluvamine J (15), contained all three of these frameworks and exhibited the best potency with IC50 values of 54 nM and 81 nM, respectively. These two most potent analogs were then tested against the OVCAR-5 cell line and the presence of the acetyl group increased the potency 14-fold from that of 9 whose IC50 = 120 nM vs. that of 15 having IC50 = 8.6 nM.Entities:
Keywords: MS-MS fragmentation profiling; PANC-1 and OVCAR-5 cytotoxicity; Zyzzya fuliginosa; makaluvamine; marine sponge
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28353633 PMCID: PMC5408244 DOI: 10.3390/md15040098
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Mar Drugs ISSN: 1660-3397 Impact factor: 5.118
Figure 1A summary of similar natural products containing the C10N2 pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline core along with their sources (S) and therapeutic potential (TP).
Figure 2Zyzzya fuliginosa sponges for the isolation campaign of their cytotoxic pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline constituents (1–12). Six of the 33 repository samples available were extensively investigated using * UCSC and # NCI-DTP material.
Figure 3Pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline containing natural products screened against the PANC-1 cell line in this study consisting of: (i) makaluvamines A (1), C (2), H (4), D (7), G (8), J-L (9–11), P (12); (ii) damirones A (5), B (3), D (6); (iii) semisynthetic makaluvamine acetates 9-N-acetyl makaluvamine A (13), 9-N-acetyl makaluvamine B (14), 15-O-acetyl makaluvamine J (15), 8,15-O-diacetyl-8-hydroxy-5a,7,8a-trien-makaluvamine J (16); and (iv) ammosamide B (17).
Scheme 1Makaluvamine and damirone MS2 fragmentation ions diagnostic for N-alkyl substitutions for the pyrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline core family. Annotated peaks, especially intense m/z ions in bold, represent a signature fingerprint. The panels (a, c) illustrate fragmentations for the iminocyclohexadienones (examples MAK C (2) and MAK J (9)) and panel (b) shows fragmentation for the animocyclohexadienediones (example DAM A (5)).
Scheme 2Outcomes of the acetylation of makaluvamines A (1) and J (9).
1H-NMR data for makaluvamines A (1), J (9), and their acetate derivatives (13–16) prepared as shown in Scheme 2.
| Position | A (1) a | A-Ac (13) a | B-Ac (14) b | J (9) a | J-Ac (15) a | J di-Ac (16) b |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| δH, mult, ( | ||||||
| 2 | 7.27, s | 7.17, s | 8.15, s | 7.31, s | 7.13, s | 7.32, s |
| 3 | 2.81, t (7.5) | 2.70, t (7.5) | 7.75, d (6.0) | 2.92, t (7.5) | 2.95, brs | 3.04, t (7.5) |
| 4 | 3.77, t (7.5) | 3.95, t (7.5) | 8.43, d (6.0) | 3.89, t (7.5) | 3.78, brs | 3.93, t (7.5) |
| 6 | 5.61, s | 6.31, s | 8.67, s | 5.59, s | 5.42, s | 6.17, s |
| 10 | 3.60, t (7.0) | 3.63, brs | 3.76, t (7.5) | |||
| 11 | 2.83, t (7.0) | 2.85, brs | 2.98, t (7.5) | |||
| 13 | 7.05, d (8.0) | 7.05, d (8.0) | 7.03, d (8.0) | |||
| 14 | 6.69, d (8.0) | 7.29, d (8.0) | 7.31, d (8.0) | |||
| N1-Me | 3.89, s | 3.83, s | 4.39, s | |||
| N5-Me | 3.37, s | 3.28, s | 3.31, s | |||
| Ac | 2.34, s | 2.26, s | 2.25, s | 2.27, s 2.09, s | ||
a 1H-NMR data measured in DMSO-d6 at 500 MHz; b 1H-NMR data measured in CD3OD at 600 MHz.
IC50 data for pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinolines and therapeutic standards against ovarian and pancreatic cancer tumor cell lines.
| Compound | PANC-1 | OVCAR-3/-5 |
|---|---|---|
| IC50 (μM) | ||
| makaluvamine A ( | 0.45 | |
| makaluvamine C ( | 0.73 | 0.24 a/NT |
| damirone B ( | 19 | |
| makaluvamine H ( | 3.6 | 0.96 a/0.10 a |
| damirone A ( | 160 | |
| damirone D ( | 3.4 | |
| makaluvamine D ( | 0.29 | |
| makaluvamine G ( | 6.2 | |
| makaluvamine J ( | 0.054 | NT/0.12 |
| makaluvamine K ( | 0.56 | |
| makaluvamine L ( | 1.9 | |
| makaluvamine P ( | 0.3 | |
| 9- | 91 | |
| 15- | 0.081 | NT/0.0086 |
| 8,15- | 0.59 | |
| ammosamide B ( | 26 | |
| FBA-TBQ ( | 0.11 b | 0.95 c/NT |
| isobatzelline C ( | 10 d | |
| discorhabdin C ( | NT | 0.33 e/2.6 e |
| etoposide | 0.39 | |
| teniposide | 0.041 | |
| gemcitabine | 7.2 f | |
NT = Not Tested; Refs: a data obtained from Dijoux et al. [9]; b data obtained from Zhang et al. [25]; c data obtained from Chen et al. [31]; d data obtained from Guzmán et al. [26]; e data obtained from the NCI-DTP 60 Human Tumor Cell Lines Database; f data obtained from Li et al. [30].
Figure 4Impact on relative in vitro IC50 Potencies [uM] against PANC-1 (coded by PP either increasing or (>) decreasing (<)) as a function of: (i) ABC-ring conjugation; (ii) +C-ring charge, and (iii) ⊕C-ring charge with a B-ring N-aryl phenol or N-aryl phenol acetate substituent for pyrrolo[4,3,2-de]quinoline containing molecules. a data obtained from Zhang et al. [25]; b data obtained from Guzmán et al. [26].
Figure 5Preclinical evaluation of makaluvamine J (9) through clonogenic dose-response evaluation employing HCT-116 cells. Continuous exposure of the cells with 9 at different concentrations during periods of: 2 h, 24 h, or 120 h. Efficacy is indicated when the surviving fraction is less than 0.1.