Literature DB >> 28353216

Dissolution comparisons using a Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) test and a comparison of various approaches for calculating the measurements of dissolution profile comparison.

J-M Cardot1, B Roudier2, H Schütz3.   

Abstract

The f 2 test is generally used for comparing dissolution profiles. In cases of high variability, the f 2 test is not applicable, and the Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) test is frequently proposed as an alternative by the FDA and EMA. The guidelines provide only general recommendations. MSD tests can be performed either on raw data with or without time as a variable or on parameters of models. In addition, data can be limited-as in the case of the f 2 test-to dissolutions of up to 85% or to all available data. In the context of the present paper, the recommended calculation included all raw dissolution data up to the first point greater than 85% as a variable-without the various times as parameters. The proposed MSD overcomes several drawbacks found in other methods.

Entities:  

Keywords:  MSD; Weibull; dissolution; f 2; multivariate statistical difference

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28353216     DOI: 10.1208/s12248-017-0063-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AAPS J        ISSN: 1550-7416            Impact factor:   4.009


  17 in total

Review 1.  Modeling and comparison of dissolution profiles.

Authors:  P Costa; J M Sousa Lobo
Journal:  Eur J Pharm Sci       Date:  2001-05       Impact factor: 4.384

2.  Novel direct curve comparison metrics for bioequivalence.

Authors:  J E Polli; A M McLean
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  2001-06       Impact factor: 4.200

3.  System-approach methods for modeling and testing similarity of in vitro dissolutions of drug dosage formulations.

Authors:  Ladislav Dedík; Mária Durisová
Journal:  Comput Methods Programs Biomed       Date:  2002-07       Impact factor: 5.428

4.  A multivariate test for similarity of two dissolution profiles.

Authors:  H Saranadasa; K Krishnamoorthy
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2005       Impact factor: 1.051

5.  A general distribution theory for a class of likelihood criteria.

Authors:  G E P BOX
Journal:  Biometrika       Date:  1949-12       Impact factor: 2.445

6.  An evaluation of fit factors and dissolution efficiency for the comparison of in vitro dissolution profiles.

Authors:  N H Anderson; M Bauer; N Boussac; R Khan-Malek; P Munden; M Sardaro
Journal:  J Pharm Biomed Anal       Date:  1998-08       Impact factor: 3.935

7.  In vitro dissolution profile comparison--statistics and analysis of the similarity factor, f2.

Authors:  V P Shah; Y Tsong; P Sathe; J P Liu
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1998-06       Impact factor: 4.200

8.  In-vitro dissolution profile comparison: statistics and analysis, model dependent approach.

Authors:  P M Sathe; Y Tsong; V P Shah
Journal:  Pharm Res       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 4.200

Review 9.  Review of methodologies for the comparison of dissolution profile data.

Authors:  T O'Hara; A Dunne; A Kinahan; S Cunningham; P Stark; J Devane
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  1997       Impact factor: 2.622

10.  Dissolution curve comparisons through the F(2) parameter, a Bayesian extension of the f(2) statistic.

Authors:  Steven Novick; Yan Shen; Harry Yang; John Peterson; Dave LeBlond; Stan Altan
Journal:  J Biopharm Stat       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 1.051

View more
  2 in total

1.  A Simple Approach for Comparing the In Vitro Dissolution Profiles of Highly Variable Drug Products: a Proposal.

Authors:  Marilyn N Martinez; Xiongce Zhao
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2018-06-25       Impact factor: 4.009

Review 2.  In Vitro Dissolution and in Silico Modeling Shortcuts in Bioequivalence Testing.

Authors:  Moawia M Al-Tabakha; Muaed J Alomar
Journal:  Pharmaceutics       Date:  2020-01-04       Impact factor: 6.321

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.