Literature DB >> 25357203

Dissolution curve comparisons through the F(2) parameter, a Bayesian extension of the f(2) statistic.

Steven Novick1, Yan Shen, Harry Yang, John Peterson, Dave LeBlond, Stan Altan.   

Abstract

Dissolution (or in vitro release) studies constitute an important aspect of pharmaceutical drug development. One important use of such studies is for justifying a biowaiver for post-approval changes which requires establishing equivalence between the new and old product. We propose a statistically rigorous modeling approach for this purpose based on the estimation of what we refer to as the F2 parameter, an extension of the commonly used f2 statistic. A Bayesian test procedure is proposed in relation to a set of composite hypotheses that capture the similarity requirement on the absolute mean differences between test and reference dissolution profiles. Several examples are provided to illustrate the application. Results of our simulation study comparing the performance of f2 and the proposed method show that our Bayesian approach is comparable to or in many cases superior to the f2 statistic as a decision rule. Further useful extensions of the method, such as the use of continuous-time dissolution modeling, are considered.

Keywords:  Bayesian model; Dissolution profile similarity; F2 parameter; In vitro release; f2 statistic

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2015        PMID: 25357203     DOI: 10.1080/10543406.2014.971175

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biopharm Stat        ISSN: 1054-3406            Impact factor:   1.051


  3 in total

1.  Dissolution comparisons using a Multivariate Statistical Distance (MSD) test and a comparison of various approaches for calculating the measurements of dissolution profile comparison.

Authors:  J-M Cardot; B Roudier; H Schütz
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2017-03-28       Impact factor: 4.009

2.  Assessment of the Regulatory Methods for the Comparison of Highly Variable Dissolution Profiles.

Authors:  Victor Mangas-Sanjuan; Sarin Colon-Useche; Isabel Gonzalez-Alvarez; Marival Bermejo; Alfredo Garcia-Arieta
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2016-08-29       Impact factor: 4.009

3.  DISSOLUTION PROFILE SIMILARITY ANALYSES-STATISTICAL PRINCIPLES, METHODS AND CONSIDERATIONS.

Authors:  Thomas Hoffelder; David Leblond; Leslie Van Alstine; Dorys Argelia Diaz; Sandra Suarez-Sharp; Krista Witkowski; Stan Altan; James Reynolds; Zachary Bergeron; Kevin Lief; Yanbing Zheng; Andreas Abend
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-04-06       Impact factor: 4.009

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.