Literature DB >> 28352953

Three-dimensional volume rendering of pelvic models and paraurethral masses based on MRI cross-sectional images.

Stergios K Doumouchtsis1,2,3, Daron A Nazarian4, Nivedita Gauthaman5, Constantin M Durnea6, Graham Munneke7.   

Abstract

AIMS: Our aim was to assess the feasibility of rendering 3D pelvic models using magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) scans of patients with vaginal, urethral and paraurethral lesions and obtain additional information previously unavailable through 2D imaging modalities.
METHODS: A purposive sample of five female patients 26-40 years old undergoing investigations for vaginal or paraurethral mass was obtained in a tertiary teaching hospital. 3D volume renderings of the bladder, urethra and paraurethral masses were constructed using 3D-Slicer v.3.4.0. Spatial dimensions were determined and compared with findings from clinical, MRI, surgical and histopathological reports. The quality of information regarding size and location of paraurethral masses obtained from 3D models was compared with information from cross-sectional MRI and review of clinical, surgical and histopathological findings.
RESULTS: The analysis of rendered 3D models yielded detailed anatomical dimensions and provided information that was in agreement and in higher detail than information based on clinical examination, cross-sectional 2D MRI analysis and histopathological reports. High-quality pelvic 3D models were rendered with the characteristics and resolution to allow identification and detailed viewing of the spatial relationship between anatomical structures.
CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first preliminary study to evaluate the role of MRI-based 3D pelvic models for investigating paraurethral masses. This is a feasible technique and may prove a useful addition to conventional 2D MRI. Further prospective studies are required to evaluate this modality for investigating such lesions and planning appropriate management.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D pelvic model; 3D volume rendering; Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI); Pelvic segmentation; Urethral diverticulum pelvic imaging; Urethral masses

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28352953     DOI: 10.1007/s00192-017-3317-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int Urogynecol J        ISSN: 0937-3462            Impact factor:   2.894


  15 in total

Review 1.  Female urethral diverticula.

Authors:  James W S Lee; Michelle M Fynes
Journal:  Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol       Date:  2005-09-19       Impact factor: 5.237

2.  Liver surgery planning using virtual reality.

Authors:  Bernhard Reitinger; Alexander Bornik; Reinhard Beichel; Dieter Schmalstieg
Journal:  IEEE Comput Graph Appl       Date:  2006 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 2.088

3.  Virtual reality techniques. Application to anatomic visualization and orthopaedics training.

Authors:  Pheng-Ann Heng; Chun-Yiu Cheng; Tien-Tsin Wong; Wen Wu; Yangsheng Xu; Yongming Xie; Yim-Pan Chui; Kai-Ming Chan; Kwok-Sui Leung
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 4.176

4.  Efficient liver surgery planning in 3D based on functional segment classification and volumetric information.

Authors:  Henrique G Debarba; Dinamar J Zanchet; Daiane Fracaro; Anderson Maciel; Antonio N Kalil
Journal:  Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2010

Review 5.  A review of 3D vessel lumen segmentation techniques: models, features and extraction schemes.

Authors:  David Lesage; Elsa D Angelini; Isabelle Bloch; Gareth Funka-Lea
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2009-08-12       Impact factor: 8.545

6.  Pelvic floor levator hiatus measurements: MRI versus ultrasound.

Authors:  Rahel Nardos; Amy Thurmond; Amanda Holland; W Thomas Gregory
Journal:  Female Pelvic Med Reconstr Surg       Date:  2014 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 2.091

7.  Urethral diverticulum in women: diverse presentations resulting in diagnostic delay and mismanagement.

Authors:  L J Romanzi; A Groutz; J G Blaivas
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 8.  Urethral diverticula.

Authors:  S J Bennett
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 2.435

Review 9.  CT of pelvic fractures.

Authors:  Marco Falchi; Gian Andrea Rollandi
Journal:  Eur J Radiol       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.528

10.  MRI of the female pelvis: a review.

Authors:  H Hricak
Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol       Date:  1986-06       Impact factor: 3.959

View more
  2 in total

1.  3D Models of Female Pelvis Structures Reconstructed and Represented in Combination with Anatomical and Radiological Sections.

Authors:  L Asensio Romero; M Asensio Gómez; A Prats-Galino; J A Juanes Méndez
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2018-01-15       Impact factor: 4.460

2.  3D-Volume Rendering of the Pelvis with Emphasis on Paraurethral Structures Based on MRI Scans and Comparisons between 3D Slicer and OsiriX®.

Authors:  C M Durnea; S Siddiqi; D Nazarian; G Munneke; P M Sedgwick; S K Doumouchtsis
Journal:  J Med Syst       Date:  2021-01-20       Impact factor: 4.460

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.