| Literature DB >> 28352337 |
Peng Wei1, Bing Han2, Wen-Jun Zhang3, Jie Bai3, Chun-Ying Jiang2, Chong-Rong Qiu4, Qian Zhang2, Qiang Fu2, Xiang-Jun Yang5.
Abstract
The aim of the present study was to observe and investigate the changes in the serum level of high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hs-CRP), the endothelial cell-specific molecule-1 (ESM-1) and short-term prognosis of patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) treated by ticagrelor. We enrolled 107 patients with acute STEMI who were admitted in the Department of Cardiology for the first time with occurrence of symptoms, and we successfully performed emergency operation of percutaneous coronary intervention. The patients were divided into two groups, 54 patients in the ticagrelor group (treatment group) and 53 patients in the clopidogrel group (control group), according to the administration of ticagrelor or clopidogrel in dual anti-platelet therapy. Then, we observed the changes at the time of admission, at 24 h, and 4th and 7th day after administration and investigated the correlations between them and the effect of ticagrelor on the short-term prognosis of acute STEMI patients. Significant increases of the serum levels of hs-CRP and ESM-1 were seen in patients of the two groups 24 h after administration of drugs with statistically significant differences between the groups (P<0.05), and on the 4th and 7th day we found a downward trend with statistically significant differences (P<0.05). The level of ESM-1 enhanced the increase of hs-CRP, indicating there was a positive correlation between ESM-1 and hs-CRP (r=0.535, P<0.001). A comparison of the occurrence rates of ischemic outcome event, bleeding and overall adverse events between the two groups yielded no statistically significant difference (P>0.05). In conclusion, the present study demonstrates that ticagrelor can reduce the prevalence of inflammatory reactions rapidly and stabilize the functions of vascular endothelium to improve the stability of atherosclerosis plaque and decrease the occurrence rate of thrombosis as well as ischemic outcome event without any obvious increase in the risk of bleeding. Thus, ticagrelor should be recommended in clinical practices for the treatment of patients with STEMI.Entities:
Keywords: acute ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction; endothelial cell-specific molecule-1; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; percutaneous coronary intervention; ticagrelor
Year: 2016 PMID: 28352337 PMCID: PMC5348695 DOI: 10.3892/etm.2016.3987
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Exp Ther Med ISSN: 1792-0981 Impact factor: 2.447
Comparison of baseline material of patients in the two groups.
| Variables | Treatment group (N=54) | Control group (N=53) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gender (male/female) | 31/23 | 31/22 | 0.910 |
| Age (years) | 53.28±11.85 | 52.49±11.69 | 0.730 |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 24.80±2.55 | 24.21±2.46 | 0.226 |
| Risk factors of cardiology, n (%) | |||
| Smoking | 26 (48.1) | 25 (47.2) | 0.919 |
| Intake of alcohol | 30 (55.6) | 27 (50.9) | 0.633 |
| Hypertension | 21 (38.9) | 24 (45.3) | 0.503 |
| Family medical history of coronary heart disease | 5 (9.3) | 4 (7.5) | 1.000 |
| TC (mmol/l) | 4.88±0.55 | 4.75±0.66 | 0.290 |
| LDL-C (mmol/l) | 3.09±0.41 | 3.18±0.40 | 0.272 |
| TG (mmol/l) | 1.35±0.43 | 1.33±0.43 | 0.785 |
| Drugs utilized during the study, n (%) | |||
| Low molecular weight heparin | 54 (100.0) | 53 (100.0) | − |
| IIb/IIIa glycoprotein inhibitors | 24 (44.4) | 23 (43.4) | 0.913 |
| β-receptor inhibitor | 43 (79.6) | 45 (84.9) | 0.475 |
| ACEI/ARB | 41 (75.9) | 40 (75.4) | 1.000 |
| Statins | 54 (100.0) | 53 (100.0) | 1.000 |
| CCB | 18 (33.3) | 19 (35.8) | 0.784 |
| Nitrates | 47 (87.0) | 45 (84.9) | 0.751 |
| PPIs | 28 (51.9) | 30 (56.6) | 0.622 |
| H2RA | 13 (24.1) | 12 (22.6) | 0.861 |
| GOT (µ/l) | 39.39±8.50 | 41.45±6.96 | 0.174 |
| GPT (µ/l) | 34.56±5.45 | 35.50±6.76 | 0.433 |
| Creatinine (µmol/l) | 88.38±11.09 | 85.11±9.90 | 0.111 |
| Urea nitrogen (mmol/l) | 6.88±1.65 | 6.55±1.92 | 0.343 |
| Blood glucose under | 7.67±2.30 | 7.99±2.42 | 0.483 |
| stress (mmol/l) | |||
| EF | 0.50±0.04 | 0.49±0.06 | 0.511 |
No statistically significant differences were found in comparison to baseline material in the groups (P>0.05). BMI, body mass index; LDL, low-density lipoprotein; GOT, glutamic oxaloacetic transaminase; GPT, glutamic-pyruvic transaminase; EF, ejection fraction.
Comparison of serum levels of hs-CRP and ESM-1 in the groups.
| Variables | Treatment group (N=54) | Control group (N=53) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| hs-CRP (mg/l) | |||
| At the time of admission | 7.83±2.84 | 7.91±2.72 | 0.779 |
| 24 h after administration of drugs | 26.07±5.34 | 27.89±6.50 | 0.002 |
| 4th day after administration of drugs | 12.46±4.00 | 14.81±5.51 | 0.001 |
| 7th day after administration of drugs | 6.15±1.67 | 7.03±2.31 | 0.011 |
| ESM-1 (mg/l) | |||
| At the time of admission | 1.13±0.15 | 1.12±0.18 | 0.806 |
| 24 h after administration of drugs | 1.20±0.18 | 1.27±0.19 | 0.046 |
| 4th day after administration of drugs | 1.13±0.17 | 1.20±0.18 | 0.045 |
| 7th day after administration of drugs | 1.05±0.16 | 1.12±0.16 | 0.012 |
hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ESM-1, endothelial cell-specific molecule-1.
Figure 1.Comparison of serum level of hs-CRP of patients at different time-points in the groups. #Comparison between treatment and control groups (P<0.05). hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein.
Figure 2.Comparison of serum level of ESM-1 of patients at different time-points in the groups. #Comparison between treatment and control groups (P<0.05). ESM-1, endothelial cell-specific molecule-1.
Analysis of the correlation among hs-CRP and ESM-1.
| Variables | hs-CRP |
|---|---|
| ESM-1 | |
| r | 0.535 |
| P-value | <0.001 |
hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ESM-1, endothelial cell-specific molecule-1.
Figure 3.Scatter diagram of correlation between serum levels of hs-CRP and ESM-1. hs-CRP, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein; ESM-1, endothelial cell-specific molecule-1.
Comparison of major efficacy endpoint events of 30 days in the two groups.
| Variables | Treatment group (N=54) | Control group (N=53) | P-value |
|---|---|---|---|
| Ischemic endpoint events, n (%) | 1 (1.9) | 3 (5.7) | 0.363 |
| Cardiac death | 1 (1.9) | 1 (1.9) | 1.000 |
| Acute myocardial infarction | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) | 1.000 |
| Emergency coronary revascularization | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | − |
| Stroke | 0 (0.0) | 1 (1.9) | 1.000 |
| Bleeding events, n (%) | 5 (9.3) | 4 (7.5) | 1.000 |
| Major bleeding events | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | − |
| Other major bleeding events | 0 (0.0) | 0 (0.0) | − |
| Secondary bleeding events | 1 (1.9) | 1 (1.9) | 1.000 |
| Slight bleeding events | 4 (7.4) | 3 (5.7) | 1.000 |
| Total adverse events, n (%) | 6 (11.1) | 7 (13.2) | 0.740 |