| Literature DB >> 28352195 |
Xiao-Ming Wu1, Jun-Feng Wang1, Jian-Song Ji2, Ming-Gao Chen1, Jian-Gang Song1.
Abstract
Although the efficacy of transcatheter arterial chemoembolization (TACE) has been recommended as first-line therapy for nonsurgical patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), it is difficult to accurately predict the efficacy of TACE. Therefore, this study evaluated the efficacy of TACE for HCC using magnetic resonance (MR) diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI). A total of 84 HCC patients who received initial TACE were selected and assigned to the stable group (n=39) and the progressive group (n=45). Before TACE treatment, a contrast-enhanced MR scan and DWI (b=300, 600, and 800 s/mm2) were performed on all patients. The modified response evaluation criteria in solid tumors were used for evaluation of tumor response. Receiver operating characteristic curve was employed to predict the value of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) for TACE efficacy. The ADC values of HCC patients in the progressive group were higher than those in the stable group at different b-values (b=300, 600, and 800 s/mm2) before TACE treatment. The area under the curve of ADC values with b-values of 300, 600, and 800 s/mm2 were 0.693, 0.724, and 0.746; the threshold values were 1.94×10-3 mm2/s, 1.28×10-3 mm2/s, and 1.20×10-3 mm2/s; the sensitivity values were 55.6%, 77.8%, and 73.3%; and the specificity values were 82.1%, 61.5%, and 71.8%, respectively. Our findings indicate that the ADC values of MR-DWI may accurately predict the efficacy of TACE in the treatment of HCC patients.Entities:
Keywords: apparent diffusion coefficient; diffusion-weighted imaging; hepatocellular carcinoma; magnetic resonance imaging; transcatheter arterial chemoembolization
Year: 2017 PMID: 28352195 PMCID: PMC5360395 DOI: 10.2147/OTT.S115568
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Onco Targets Ther ISSN: 1178-6930 Impact factor: 4.147
Baseline characteristics of HCC patients between the stable and progressive groups
| Clinical parameters | Stable group (n=39) | Progressive group (n=45) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Mean age (years) | 52.6±10.2 | 54.8±9.1 | 0.299 |
| Gender | 0.64 | ||
| Male | 25 | 32 | |
| Female | 14 | 13 | |
| Hepatitis B cirrhosis | 0.038 | ||
| Yes | 26 | 39 | |
| No | 13 | 6 | |
| AFP value (ng/mL) | 14,903.14±7,657.05 | 16,897.41±8,270.26 | 0.254 |
| Clinical stage | 0.031 | ||
| Ib | 8 | 4 | |
| IIa | 18 | 13 | |
| IIb | 13 | 21 | |
| IIIa | 0 | 5 | |
| IIIb | 0 | 2 | |
| Portal vein cancerous embolus | 0.009 | ||
| Yes | 1 | 10 | |
| No | 38 | 35 | |
| CTP score | 0.021 | ||
| A | 29 | 20 | |
| B | 9 | 22 | |
| C | 1 | 3 | |
| Arteriovenous fistulas | 0.028 | ||
| Yes | 0 | 6 | |
| No | 39 | 39 | |
Abbreviations: HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; AFP, α-fetoprotein; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh.
Figure 1A 68-year-old woman with a pathologically confirmed diagnosis of HCC (arrows).
Notes: (A–C) the lesion (arrows) showed high signal intensity in diffusion-weighted images at different b-values; (A) b=300 s/mm2; (B) b=600 s/mm2; (C) b=800 s/mm2; (D–F) the lesion (arrows) showed restricted diffusion with a low ADC value at different b-value combinations; (D) b=300 s/mm2; (E) b=600 s/mm2; (F) b=800 s/mm2. Magnification ×200.
Abbreviations: ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
The comparison of preoperative ADC values (mean ± standard deviation) of HCC patients between the stable and progressive groups
| Stable group (n=39) | Progressive group (n=45) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 300 | 1.71±0.46 | 1.93±0.48 | 0.036 |
| 600 | 1.33±0.34 | 1.54±0.38 | 0.01 |
| 800 | 1.24±0.37 | 1.42±0.40 | 0.036 |
Abbreviations: ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma.
Figure 2Comparison of ADC values of HCC patients between the stable and progressive groups before TACE.
Abbreviations: ADC, apparent diffusion coefficient; HCC, hepatocellular carcinoma; TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization.
Figure 3Variations in the sensitivity and specificity of ROC curve at different b-values.
Abbreviation: ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Variations in the AUC ROC curve at different b-values
| AUC | SE | 95% CI
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Upper limit | Lower limit | ||||
| 300 | 0.693 | 0.057 | 0.002 | 0.581 | 0.805 |
| 600 | 0.724 | 0.055 | <0.001 | 0.616 | 0.832 |
| 800 | 0.746 | 0.054 | <0.001 | 0.639 | 0.852 |
Note:
The comparison between the areas under ROC with the 0.5 areas under the curve without diagnostic value.
Abbreviations: AUC, area under the curve; SE, standard error; CI, confidence interval; ROC, receiver operating characteristic.
Predictors of disease progression post-TACE
| Element | β | SE | Wald | RR | 95% CI
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lower limit | Upper limit | |||||||
| ADC300 | −3.062 | 1.605 | 3.638 | 1 | 0.056 | 0.047 | 0.002 | 1.088 |
| ADC600 | 4.346 | 1.983 | 4.802 | 1 | 0.028 | 77.158 | 1.583 | 3,761.794 |
| ADC800 | 0.898 | 0.404 | 4.936 | 1 | 0.026 | 2.456 | 1.112 | 5.424 |
| Hepatitis B cirrhosis | 1.398 | 0.541 | 6.68 | 1 | 0.01 | 4.045 | 1.402 | 11.674 |
| Clinical stage | – | – | 9.949 | 2 | 0.007 | – | – | – |
| I | 1.853 | 0.69 | 7.215 | 1 | 0.007 | 6.382 | 1.65 | 24.677 |
| II | 2.511 | 0.796 | 9.941 | 1 | 0.002 | 12.316 | 2.586 | 58.663 |
| Portal vein cancerous embolus | 2.417 | 0.519 | 21.659 | 1 | <0.001 | 11.207 | 4.05 | 31.008 |
| CTP score | – | – | 16.04 | 2 | <0.001 | – | – | – |
| B | 1.003 | 0.351 | 8.156 | 1 | 0.004 | 2.727 | 1.37 | 5.427 |
| C | 2.915 | 0.791 | 13.598 | 1 | <0.001 | 18.453 | 3.919 | 86.893 |
| Arteriovenous fistulas | 1.859 | 0.549 | 11.448 | 1 | 0.001 | 6.415 | 2.186 | 18.828 |
Abbreviations: TACE, transcatheter arterial chemoembolization; ADC300, the ADC value with the b-value of 300 s/mm2; ADC600, the ADC value with the b-value of 600 s/mm2; ADC800, the ADC value with the b-value of 800 s/mm2; β, partial regression coefficient; SE, standard error; df, degree of freedom; RR, relative risk; CI, confidence interval; CTP, Child-Turcotte-Pugh.