Literature DB >> 28349405

Quantitative Modeling and Automated Analysis of Meiotic Recombination.

Martin A White1, Shunxin Wang1, Liangran Zhang2, Nancy Kleckner3.   

Abstract

Many morphological features, in both physical and biological systems, exhibit spatial patterns that are specifically characterized by a tendency to occur with even spacing (in one, two, or three dimensions). The positions of crossover (CO) recombination events along meiotic chromosomes provide an interesting biological example of such an effect. In general, mechanisms that explain such patterns may (a) be mechanically based, (b) occur by a reaction-diffusion mechanism in which macroscopic mechanical effects are irrelevant, or (c) involve a combination of both types of effects. We have proposed that meiotic CO patterns arise by a mechanical mechanism, have developed mathematical expressions for such a process based on a particular physical system with analogous properties (the so-called beam-film model), and have shown that the beam-film model can very accurately explain experimental CO patterns as a function of the values of specific defined parameters. Importantly, the mathematical expressions of the beam-film model can apply quite generally to any mechanism, whether it involves mechanical components or not, as long as its logic and component features correspond to those of the beam-film system. Furthermore, via its various parameters, the beam-film model discretizes the patterning process into specific components. Thus, the model can be used to explore the theoretically predicted effects of various types of changes in the patterning process. Such predictions can expand detailed understanding of the bases for various biological effects. We present here a new MATLAB program that implements the mathematical expressions of the beam-film model with increased robustness and accessibility as compared to programs presented previously. As in previous versions, the presented program permits both (1) simulation of predicted CO positions along chromosomes of a test population and (2) easy analysis of CO positions, both for experimental data sets and for data sets resulting from simulations. The goal of the current presentation is to make these approaches more readily accessible to a wider audience of researchers. Also, the program is easily modified, and we encourage interested users to make changes to suit their specific needs. A link to the program is available on the Kleckner laboratory website: http://projects.iq.harvard.edu/kleckner_lab .

Entities:  

Keywords:  Beam-film model; Chromosome; Crossover interference; Meiosis; Patterning; Simulation

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28349405      PMCID: PMC5498002          DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4939-6340-9_18

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Methods Mol Biol        ISSN: 1064-3745


  11 in total

Review 1.  Meiotic Recombination: The Essence of Heredity.

Authors:  Neil Hunter
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-10-28       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 2.  Recombination, Pairing, and Synapsis of Homologs during Meiosis.

Authors:  Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2015-05-18       Impact factor: 10.005

3.  Interference-mediated synaptonemal complex formation with embedded crossover designation.

Authors:  Liangran Zhang; Eric Espagne; Arnaud de Muyt; Denise Zickler; Nancy E Kleckner
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-11-07       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 4.  Meiotic crossover patterns: obligatory crossover, interference and homeostasis in a single process.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  Topoisomerase II mediates meiotic crossover interference.

Authors:  Liangran Zhang; Shunxin Wang; Shen Yin; Soogil Hong; Keun P Kim; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2014-07-13       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  Combined fluorescent and electron microscopic imaging unveils the specific properties of two classes of meiotic crossovers.

Authors:  Lorinda K Anderson; Leslie D Lohmiller; Xiaomin Tang; D Boyd Hammond; Lauren Javernick; Lindsay Shearer; Sayantani Basu-Roy; Olivier C Martin; Matthieu Falque
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2014-09-02       Impact factor: 11.205

7.  Crossover patterning by the beam-film model: analysis and implications.

Authors:  Liangran Zhang; Zhangyi Liang; John Hutchinson; Nancy Kleckner
Journal:  PLoS Genet       Date:  2014-01-30       Impact factor: 5.917

8.  Factors that affect the location and frequency of meiosis-induced double-strand breaks in Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  T C Wu; M Lichten
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  1995-05       Impact factor: 4.562

9.  Tel1(ATM)-mediated interference suppresses clustered meiotic double-strand-break formation.

Authors:  Valerie Garcia; Stephen Gray; Rachal M Allison; Tim J Cooper; Matthew J Neale
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2015-01-05       Impact factor: 49.962

10.  Cytological studies of human meiosis: sex-specific differences in recombination originate at, or prior to, establishment of double-strand breaks.

Authors:  Jennifer R Gruhn; Carmen Rubio; Karl W Broman; Patricia A Hunt; Terry Hassold
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-20       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  15 in total

1.  Inefficient Crossover Maturation Underlies Elevated Aneuploidy in Human Female Meiosis.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Terry Hassold; Patricia Hunt; Martin A White; Denise Zickler; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-02       Impact factor: 41.582

Review 2.  Crossover Interference, Crossover Maturation, and Human Aneuploidy.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Yanlei Liu; Yongliang Shang; Binyuan Zhai; Xiao Yang; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Bioessays       Date:  2019-08-19       Impact factor: 4.345

3.  Crossover maturation inefficiency and aneuploidy in human female meiosis.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2017-05-04       Impact factor: 4.534

4.  Modelling Sex-Specific Crossover Patterning in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Eric Jenczewski
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 4.562

5.  Per-Nucleus Crossover Covariation and Implications for Evolution.

Authors:  Shunxin Wang; Carl Veller; Fei Sun; Aurora Ruiz-Herrera; Yongliang Shang; Hongbin Liu; Denise Zickler; Zijiang Chen; Nancy Kleckner; Liangran Zhang
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2019-03-14       Impact factor: 41.582

6.  Negative supercoils regulate meiotic crossover patterns in budding yeast.

Authors:  Taicong Tan; Yingjin Tan; Ying Wang; Xiao Yang; Binyuan Zhai; Shuxian Zhang; Xuan Yang; Hui Nie; Jinmin Gao; Jun Zhou; Liangran Zhang; Shunxin Wang
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2022-10-14       Impact factor: 19.160

7.  The megabase-scale crossover landscape is largely independent of sequence divergence.

Authors:  Qichao Lian; Victor Solier; Birgit Walkemeier; Stéphanie Durand; Bruno Huettel; Korbinian Schneeberger; Raphael Mercier
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2022-07-02       Impact factor: 17.694

8.  CDKG1 Is Required for Meiotic and Somatic Recombination Intermediate Processing in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Candida Nibau; Andrew Lloyd; Despoina Dadarou; Alexander Betekhtin; Foteini Tsilimigka; Dylan W Phillips; John H Doonan
Journal:  Plant Cell       Date:  2020-02-10       Impact factor: 11.277

9.  Unleashing meiotic crossovers in hybrid plants.

Authors:  Joiselle Blanche Fernandes; Mathilde Séguéla-Arnaud; Cécile Larchevêque; Andrew H Lloyd; Raphael Mercier
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2017-11-28       Impact factor: 11.205

10.  Plasticity of Meiotic Recombination Rates in Response to Temperature in Arabidopsis.

Authors:  Andrew Lloyd; Chris Morgan; F Chris H Franklin; Kirsten Bomblies
Journal:  Genetics       Date:  2018-03-01       Impact factor: 4.562

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.