James Russell1, Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty2, Robin M Kramer3,4, Paul B Romesser5, Pooja Desai2, Adriana Haimovitz-Friedman5, Maeve A Lowery6, John L Humm7. 1. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. russellj@mskcc.org. 2. Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 3. Research Animal Resource Center, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 4. Division of Comparative Medicine, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA, USA. 5. Department of Radiation Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 6. Department of Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA. 7. Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Although gemcitabine is a mainstay of pancreatic cancer therapy, it is only moderately effective, and it would be desirable to measure drug uptake in patients. 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) cytosine (FAC), is an analog of gemcitabine, and when labeled with F-18, it may be a potential surrogate PET tracer for the drug. PROCEDURES: [18F]FAC was synthesized to a radiochemical purity of >96 %. The human tumor lines AsPC1, BxPC3, Capan-1, Panc1, and MiaPaca2 were grown orthotopically in nude mice. KPC mice that conditionally express oncogenic K-ras and p53 mutations in pancreatic tissue were also used. The intra-tumoral distributions of [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were mapped with autoradiography. The inter-tumor correlation between [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC was established in the orthotopic tumors. Expression of the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters (ENT, CNT) in vitro was detected by western blotting. Drug uptake was characterized in vitro using [3H]gemcitabine and the effect of transporter inhibition on gemcitabine and FAC uptake was investigated. The relative affinity of cells for gemcitabine and FAC was tested in competition assays. The cell lines differed in sensitivity to transport inhibitors and in competition studies. There was a good in vivo correlation between the total uptake of [18F]FAC and [14C]gemcitabine, measured across all orthotopic tumors. Using the KPC and BxPC3 models, we found that [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were largely co-localized. CONCLUSIONS: In the lines examined here, [18F]FAC uptake correlates well with gemcitabine in vivo, supporting the notion that [18F]FAC can serve as a PET radiotracer surrogate to determine the uptake and distribution of gemcitabine within pancreatic tumors.
PURPOSE: Although gemcitabine is a mainstay of pancreatic cancer therapy, it is only moderately effective, and it would be desirable to measure drug uptake in patients. 1-(2'-deoxy-2'-fluoroarabinofuranosyl) cytosine (FAC), is an analog of gemcitabine, and when labeled with F-18, it may be a potential surrogate PET tracer for the drug. PROCEDURES: [18F]FAC was synthesized to a radiochemical purity of >96 %. The humantumor lines AsPC1, BxPC3, Capan-1, Panc1, and MiaPaca2 were grown orthotopically in nude mice. KPC mice that conditionally express oncogenic K-ras and p53 mutations in pancreatic tissue were also used. The intra-tumoral distributions of [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were mapped with autoradiography. The inter-tumor correlation between [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC was established in the orthotopic tumors. Expression of the equilibrative and concentrative nucleoside transporters (ENT, CNT) in vitro was detected by western blotting. Drug uptake was characterized in vitro using [3H]gemcitabine and the effect of transporter inhibition on gemcitabine and FAC uptake was investigated. The relative affinity of cells for gemcitabine and FAC was tested in competition assays. The cell lines differed in sensitivity to transport inhibitors and in competition studies. There was a good in vivo correlation between the total uptake of [18F]FAC and [14C]gemcitabine, measured across all orthotopic tumors. Using the KPC and BxPC3 models, we found that [14C]gemcitabine and [18F]FAC were largely co-localized. CONCLUSIONS: In the lines examined here, [18F]FAC uptake correlates well with gemcitabine in vivo, supporting the notion that [18F]FAC can serve as a PET radiotracer surrogate to determine the uptake and distribution of gemcitabine within pancreatic tumors.
Authors: Jason T Lee; Dean O Campbell; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Johannes Czernin; Caius G Radu Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2012-02 Impact factor: 10.057
Authors: E L Jackson; N Willis; K Mercer; R T Bronson; D Crowley; R Montoya; T Jacks; D A Tuveson Journal: Genes Dev Date: 2001-12-15 Impact factor: 11.361
Authors: Dan Rudin; Liang Li; Nifang Niu; Krishna R Kalari; Judith A Gilbert; Matthew M Ames; Liewei Wang Journal: J Drug Metab Toxicol Date: 2011-02-02
Authors: German Reyes; Nicole M I Nivillac; Muhammad Zia Karim; Leroi Desouza; K W Michael Siu; Imogen R Coe Journal: Mol Membr Biol Date: 2011-08-02 Impact factor: 2.857
Authors: Christina H Wei; Tristan R Gorgan; David A Elashoff; O Joe Hines; James J Farrell; Timothy R Donahue Journal: Pancreas Date: 2013-11 Impact factor: 3.327
Authors: José García-Manteiga; Míriam Molina-Arcas; F Javier Casado; Adela Mazo; Marçal Pastor-Anglada Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2003-10-15 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: Rachel E Laing; Martin A Walter; Dean O Campbell; Harvey R Herschman; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Michael E Phelps; Johannes Czernin; Owen N Witte; Caius G Radu Journal: Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A Date: 2009-02-05 Impact factor: 11.205
Authors: Johannes Schwarzenberg; Caius G Radu; Matthias Benz; Barbara Fueger; Andrew Q Tran; Michael E Phelps; Owen N Witte; Nagichettiar Satyamurthy; Johannes Czernin; Christiaan Schiepers Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2010-12-03 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Hexuan Wang; Reem Mislati; Rifat Ahmed; Phuong Vincent; Solumtochukwu F Nwabunwanne; Jason R Gunn; Brian W Pogue; Marvin M Doyley Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2018-10-23 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: James Russell; Milan Grkovski; Isabella J O'Donoghue; Teja M Kalidindi; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Eva M Burnazi; Amanda Kulick; Amber Bahr; Qing Chang; H Carl LeKaye; Elisa de Stanchina; Kenneth H Yu; John L Humm Journal: J Nucl Med Date: 2020-07-09 Impact factor: 11.082
Authors: Milan Grkovski; Louise Fanchon; Naga Vara Kishore Pillarsetty; James Russell; John L Humm Journal: EJNMMI Res Date: 2018-06-18 Impact factor: 3.138
Authors: James Russell; Louise Fanchon; Hanan Alwaseem; Henrik Molina; Isabella O'Donoghue; Amber Bahr; Elisa de Stanchina; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; John L Humm Journal: Pharmacol Res Perspect Date: 2022-04
Authors: Bart Cornelissen; James C Knight; Somnath Mukherjee; Laura Evangelista; Catarina Xavier; Federico Caobelli; Silvana Del Vecchio; Latifa Rbah-Vidal; Jacques Barbet; Marion de Jong; Fijs W B van Leeuwen Journal: Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging Date: 2018-09-17 Impact factor: 9.236
Authors: Louise M Fanchon; James Russell; Nagavarakishore Pillarsetty; Isabella O'Donoghue; Kishore Gangangari; Kenneth H Yu; John L Humm Journal: PLoS One Date: 2020-04-16 Impact factor: 3.752