| Literature DB >> 28348881 |
Emmanuel Mouafo Tekwu1, Kwabena Mante Bosompem2, William Kofi Anyan2, Regina Appiah-Opong2, Kofi Baffour-Awuah Owusu2, Mabel Deladem Tettey2, Felicia Amanfo Kissi2, Alfred Ampomah Appiah3, Veronique Penlap Beng4, Alexander Kwadwo Nyarko5.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis is a Neglected Tropical Diseases which can be prevented with mass deworming chemotherapy. The reliance on a single drug, praziquantel, is a motivation for the search of novel antischistosomal compounds. This study investigated the anthelmintic activity of the stem bark and roots of Rauwolfia vomitoria against two life stages of Schistosoma mansoni. Both plant parts were found to be active against cercariae and adult worms. Within 2 h of exposure all cercariae were killed at a concentration range of 62.5-1000 µg/mL and 250-1000 µg/mL of R. vomitoria stem bark and roots, respectively. The LC50 values determined for the stem bark after 1 and 2 h of exposure were 207.4 and 61.18 µg/mL, respectively. All adult worms exposed to the concentrations range of 250-1000 µg/mL for both plant parts died within 120 h of incubation. The cytotoxic effects against HepG2 and Chang liver cell assessed using MTT assay method indicated that both plant extracts which were inhibitory to the proliferation of cell lines with IC50 > 20 μg/mL appear to be safe. This report provides the first evidence of in vitro schistosomicidal potency of R. vomitoria with the stem bark being moderately, but relatively, more active and selective against schistosome parasites. This suggests the presence of promising medicinal constituent(s).Entities:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28348881 PMCID: PMC5350319 DOI: 10.1155/2017/2583969
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Parasitol Res ISSN: 2090-0023
Figure 1Effect of different concentrations of R. vomitoria stem bark on the viability of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.
Figure 2Effect of different concentrations of R. vomitoria roots on the viability of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.
In vitro cercariacidal effect of ethanol extract of Rauwolfia vomitoria stem bark and root on S. mansoni cercariae.
| Plant parts | Lethal concentrations ( | Negative control | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LC50 | |||
| 1 hour | 2 hours | ||
| Stem bark | 207.4 | 61.18 | 0 |
| Roots | 1430 | 452.7 | 0 |
In vitro effects of crude ethanolic extract of R. vomitoria roots and stem bark on the viability of Schistosoma mansoni adult worms.
| Group | Incubation period (h) | Couples separated worms (%) | Dead worms (%) | Motor activity reduction (%) | Number of worms with tegumental alteration (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slight | Significant | Partial | Extensive | ||||
| Controla | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||
| 1% DMSO | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 48 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 72 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 96 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
| 120 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |
|
| |||||||
| PZQb | 2 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 80 | 0 |
| 24 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 48 | 40 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 72 | 40 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 96 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
| 120 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 100 | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 20 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 40 | 0 | |
| 48 | 20 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 80 | 0 | |
| 72 | 60 | 0 | 100 | 0 | 80 | 0 | |
| 96 | 100 | 0 | 80 | 0 | 80 | 0 | |
| 120 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 20 | |
|
| |||||||
|
| 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 0 | |
| 48 | 40 | 0 | 20 | 80 | 40 | 0 | |
| 72 | 40 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 0 | |
| 96 | 100 | 0 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 0 | |
| 120 | 100 | 100 | 0 | 100 | 80 | 0 | |
aRPMI 1640.
bTested at concentration of 10 μg/mL.
cTested at concentration of 250 μg/mL.
Percentage viability of cell proliferation.
| Conc. ( |
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HepG2 | Chang Liver | HepG2 | Chang liver | |
| Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | Mean ± SEM | |
| 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 | 100 ± 0 |
| 62.5 | 100.535 ± 0.082 | 51.716 ± 2.208 | 73.149 ± 3.892 | 102.276 ± 0.625 |
| 125 | 86.411 ± 0.048 | 45.242 ± 1.562 | 2.662 ± 0.334 | 31.807 ± 1.585 |
| 250 | 78.841 ± 0.023 | 20.779 ± 3.644 | −0.295 ± 0.082 | 18.462 ± 0.773 |
| 500 | 51.607 ± 0.119 | 9.527 ± 1.044 | −4.926 ± 0.433 | 7.523 ± 1.595 |
| 1000 | 18.408 ± 0.251 | 10.335 ± 1.176 | −16.317 ± 2.070 | 4.025 ± 4.396 |
Figure 3Dose-response curves on the effects of R. vomitoria on human HepG2 and Chang liver cells.
Cytotoxicity of the ethanolic extracts of R. vomitoria stem bark and roots.
| Cell type | Cell line | IC50 ( | SI | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stem bark | Roots | Stem bark | Roots | ||
| Normal liver | Chang Liver | 77.52 | 112 | 1.26 | 0.25 |
| Hepatocarcinoma | HepG2 | 490.7 | 72.68 | 8.01 | 0.16 |
| Normal/hepatocarcinoma | Chang/HepG2 | / | / | 0.16 | 1.54 |