| Literature DB >> 36159554 |
Emilienne Tienga Nkondo1,2, Hermine Boukeng Jatsa1,2, Nestor Gipwe Feussom1,2, Mérimé Christian Kenfack1,2, Ulrich Membe Femoe1,2, Stephanie Tamdem Guetchueng3, Theodora Kopa Kowa3, Pierre Kamtchouing1, Louis-Albert Tchuem Tchuente2,4.
Abstract
Schistosomiasis control remains a public health concern, and there is a need to evaluate new strategies for targeting larval and adult stages of the parasite. As Pedilanthus tithymaloides is empirically used to treat schistosomiasis, it becomes essential to know its effective action scientifically. This study assessed the cercaricidal and schistosomicidal activity of P. tithymaloides stem barks raffia wine extract (RwPt) and hydroethanolic extract (HePt). Different concentrations of these extracts were tested against cercariae (31.25-1000 μg/mL) and adult worms (62.5-2000 μg/mL) of Schistosoma mansoni. Niclosamide-olamine 5% (1 μg/mL) and praziquantel (10 μg/mL) were used as pharmacological controls. Cercariae viability was determined every 30 min for 180 min, and adult worms' motor activity and viability after 24 and 48 h incubation. In addition, cytotoxicity and phytochemical analysis were performed. HePt was lethal to cercariae and adult worms with LC50 of 73.91 μg/mL after 60 min of incubation and 731.17 μg/mL after 48 h of incubation, respectively. Furthermore, a significant reduction of 94.44% in motor activity was observed in surviving worms at the concentration of 2000 μg/mL. RwPt was less effective on S. mansoni cercariae with an LC50 of 617.86 μg/mL after 180 min and on adult worms with a mortality rate of 9.83% at 2000 μg/mL for 48 h incubation. Both extracts showed a weak cytotoxicity profile with an IC50 of 983.50 μg/mL for HePt and more than 1000 μg/mL for RwPt. The LC-MS analysis of HePt allowed the detection of two annotated diterpenoids. Based on the selectivity index, the hydroethanolic extract of P. tithymaloides stem barks disclosed an intense cercaricidal activity and a moderate schistosomicidal effect with low cytotoxicity. These findings may support the potential use of Pedilanthus tithymaloides as a natural product or a source of natural-derived compounds for interrupting schistosomiasis transmission.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 36159554 PMCID: PMC9507742 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2672150
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.650
Figure 1In vitro effect of the raffia wine (a) and the hydroethanolic (b) extracts of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark on the viability of Schistosoma mansoni cercariae. Niclo 5%: niclosamide-olamine 5% (1 μg/mL). RwPt: raffia wine extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark (the number in front indicates the concentration of the extract). HePt: hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark (the number in front indicates the concentration of the extract). Each point on the graph is expressed as mean ± SEM. p < 0.05 and p < 0.001: significantly different from the control (distilled water) at each time point. EEEp < 0.001: significantly different from the pharmacological control (niclosamide-olamine 5%) at each time point.
Effective and lethal concentrations of the raffia wine extract and the hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark against Schistosoma mansoni cercariae.
| Time (min) | Rw | He | |
|---|---|---|---|
| LC50 ( | 30 | — | — |
| 60 | — | 73.91 ± 3.31 CI (51.84–82.70) | |
| 90 | — | 34.07 ± 3.91 CI (18.15–45.46) | |
| 120 | — | 28.84 ± 3.30 CI (18.15–43.41) | |
| 150 | 665.14 ± 42.41 CI (454.36–778.57) | 19.26 ± 1.22 CI (13.70–25.73) | |
| 180 | 617.86 ± 34.65 CI (456.33–732.30) | 19.26 ± 1.22 CI (13.70–25.73) | |
| MEC ( | 250 | 31.25 | |
| MLC ( | 1000 | 62.50 | |
RwPt: Raffia wine extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark. HePt: hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark. LC50: median lethal concentration. MLC: minimum lethal concentration. MEC: minimum effective concentration. CI: confidence interval.
In vitro schistosomicidal activities of Pedilanthus tithymaloides raffia wine and hydroethanolic extracts after 24 and 48 hours of incubation.
| Groups | Concentrations ( | Mortality rate (%)a | Dead females (%)b | Dead males (%)c | Motor activity reduction (%)d | Lethal concentration 50 ( | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Incubation period | Incubation period | |||||||
| 24 h | 48 h | 24 h | 48 h | |||||
| Control (GMEM) | — | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.69 | 6.96 | — |
|
| ||||||||
| Praziquantel | 10 | 100 | 100 | 100 | 100 | — | — | — |
|
| ||||||||
| Rw | 2000 | 0 | 9.83 | 11.80 | 8.34 | 7.06 | 18.07 | > |
| 1000 | 0 | 1.14 | 0 | 2.00 | 0 | 9.30 | ||
| 500 | 0 | 1.50 | 0 | 1.78 | 0 | 5.40 | ||
| 250 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 125 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
| 62.5 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | ||
|
| ||||||||
| He | 2000 | 25.60 | 86.47 | 78.33 | 95.15 | 26.54 | 94.44 |
|
| 1000 | 10.98 | 66.34 | 52.03 | 81.46 | 19.08 | 82.54 | ||
| 500 | 8.94 | 24.39 | 6.06 | 39.74 | 11.92 | 35.97 | ||
| 250 | 6.99 | 26.63 | 0 | 34.80 | 9.45 | 30.31 | ||
| 125 | 1.63 | 5.07 | 0 | 10.84 | 4.86 | 12.28 | ||
| 62.5 | 3.22 | 13.68 | 8.29 | 18.48 | 0.74 | 12.17 | ||
GMEM: Glasgow minimal essential medium. RwPt: raffia wine extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark. HePt: hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark. aPercentages relative to all worms. bPercentages relative to female worms after 48 h incubation. cPercentages relative to male worms after 48 h incubation. dPercentages relative to surviving worms. —: not applicable. CI: confidence interval.
Cytotoxicity profile and selectivity index of Pedilanthus tithymaloides extracts for the cercaricidal and schistosomicidal activities.
| Cytotoxicity | Cercaricidal activity | Schistosomicidal activity | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Extracts | Concentrations ( | Inhibition rates (%) | CI50 ( | LC50 ( | SI | LC50 ( | SI |
| Rw | 1000 | 32.27 ± 0.16 | > | 665.14 ± 42.41 | > | >2000 | < |
| 500 | 23.69 ± 0.03 | ||||||
| 250 | 18.67 ± 0.57 | ||||||
| 125 | 16.24 ± 1.01 | ||||||
| 62.5 | 15.67 ± 0.75 | ||||||
| 31.25 | 13.65 ± 0.15 | ||||||
| 15.625 | 9.03 ± 1.03 | ||||||
|
| |||||||
| He | 1000 | 50.17 ± 0.23 |
| 19.26 ± 1.22 |
| 731.17 |
|
| 500 | 36.72 ± 3.51 | ||||||
| 250 | 37.10 ± 1.92 | ||||||
| 125 | 39.47 ± 0.28 | ||||||
| 62.5 | 37.35 ± 1.44 | ||||||
| 31.25 | 35.09 ± 1.36 | ||||||
| 15.625 | 27.63 ± 0.20 | ||||||
SI: selectivity index. RwPt: raffia wine extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark. HePt: hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark.
Figure 2LC-MS chromatogram of the hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark (a) and spectra of annotated compounds (b and c).
Main signals exhibited in the LC-MS spectra of compounds detected in the hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark and proposed attribution.
| N° | Retention time (min) | m/z [M+Na]+ | Molecular formula | Annotated compounds | Reference |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 |
| 739.2914 | C37H48O14Na | 7,8 | [ |
| 2 |
| 781.3040 | C39H50O15Na | 1 | [ |
Figure 3Chemical structures of annotated jatrophane diterpenoids detected in the hydroethanolic extract of Pedilanthus tithymaloides stem bark.