BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), computed tomography (CT) remains the standard for annulus sizing. However, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been an alternative in patients with contraindications to CT. We sought to (1) test the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of prototype 3DTEE analysis software (Philips) for aortic annular measurements and (2) compare the new approach to the existing echocardiographic techniques. METHODS: We prospectively studied 52 patients who underwent gated contrast CT, procedural 3DTEE, and TAVR. 3DTEE images were analyzed using novel semi-automated software designed for 3D measurements of the aortic root, which uses multiplanar reconstruction, similar to CT analysis. Aortic annulus measurements included area, perimeter, and diameter calculations from these measurements. The results were compared to CT-derived values. Additionally, 3D echocardiographic measurements (3D planimetry and mitral valve analysis software adapted for the aortic valve) were also compared to the CT reference values. RESULTS: 3DTEE image quality was sufficient in 90% of patients for aortic annulus measurements using the new software, which were in good agreement with CT (r-values: .89-.91) and small (<4%) inter-modality nonsignificant biases. Repeated measurements showed <10% measurements variability. The new 3D analysis was the more accurate and reproducible of the existing echocardiographic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Novel semi-automated 3DTEE analysis software can accurately measure aortic annulus in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, in better agreement with CT than the existing methodology. Accordingly, intra-procedural TEE could potentially replace CT in patients where CT carries significant risk.
RCT Entities:
BACKGROUND: With the increasing use of transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) in patients with aortic stenosis (AS), computed tomography (CT) remains the standard for annulus sizing. However, 3D transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) has been an alternative in patients with contraindications to CT. We sought to (1) test the feasibility, accuracy, and reproducibility of prototype 3DTEE analysis software (Philips) for aortic annular measurements and (2) compare the new approach to the existing echocardiographic techniques. METHODS: We prospectively studied 52 patients who underwent gated contrast CT, procedural 3DTEE, and TAVR. 3DTEE images were analyzed using novel semi-automated software designed for 3D measurements of the aortic root, which uses multiplanar reconstruction, similar to CT analysis. Aortic annulus measurements included area, perimeter, and diameter calculations from these measurements. The results were compared to CT-derived values. Additionally, 3D echocardiographic measurements (3D planimetry and mitral valve analysis software adapted for the aortic valve) were also compared to the CT reference values. RESULTS: 3DTEE image quality was sufficient in 90% of patients for aortic annulus measurements using the new software, which were in good agreement with CT (r-values: .89-.91) and small (<4%) inter-modality nonsignificant biases. Repeated measurements showed <10% measurements variability. The new 3D analysis was the more accurate and reproducible of the existing echocardiographic techniques. CONCLUSIONS: Novel semi-automated 3DTEE analysis software can accurately measure aortic annulus in patients with severe AS undergoing TAVR, in better agreement with CT than the existing methodology. Accordingly, intra-procedural TEE could potentially replace CT in patients where CT carries significant risk.
Authors: Darra T Murphy; Philipp Blanke; Shalan Alaamri; Christopher Naoum; Ronen Rubinshtein; Gregor Pache; Bruce Precious; Adam Berger; Rekha Raju; Danny Dvir; David A Wood; John Webb; Jonathon A Leipsic Journal: J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr Date: 2015-07-26
Authors: Won-Keun Kim; Alexander Meyer; Helge Möllmann; Andreas Rolf; Susanne Möllmann; Johannes Blumenstein; Arnaud Van Linden; Christian W Hamm; Thomas Walther; Jörg Kempfert Journal: Clin Res Cardiol Date: 2016-02-18 Impact factor: 5.460
Authors: Omar K Khalique; Susheel K Kodali; Jean-Michel Paradis; Tamim M Nazif; Mathew R Williams; Andrew J Einstein; Gregory D Pearson; Kishore Harjai; Kendra Grubb; Isaac George; Martin B Leon; Rebecca T Hahn Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-11-12 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Arnold C T Ng; Victoria Delgado; Frank van der Kley; Miriam Shanks; Nico R L van de Veire; Matteo Bertini; Gaetano Nucifora; Rutger J van Bommel; Laurens F Tops; Arend de Weger; Giuseppe Tavilla; Albert de Roos; Lucia J Kroft; Dominic Y Leung; Joanne Schuijf; Martin J Schalij; Jeroen J Bax Journal: Circ Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2009-11-17 Impact factor: 7.792
Authors: Craig R Smith; Martin B Leon; Michael J Mack; D Craig Miller; Jeffrey W Moses; Lars G Svensson; E Murat Tuzcu; John G Webb; Gregory P Fontana; Raj R Makkar; Mathew Williams; Todd Dewey; Samir Kapadia; Vasilis Babaliaros; Vinod H Thourani; Paul Corso; Augusto D Pichard; Joseph E Bavaria; Howard C Herrmann; Jodi J Akin; William N Anderson; Duolao Wang; Stuart J Pocock Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2011-06-05 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: David H Adams; Jeffrey J Popma; Michael J Reardon; Steven J Yakubov; Joseph S Coselli; G Michael Deeb; Thomas G Gleason; Maurice Buchbinder; James Hermiller; Neal S Kleiman; Stan Chetcuti; John Heiser; William Merhi; George Zorn; Peter Tadros; Newell Robinson; George Petrossian; G Chad Hughes; J Kevin Harrison; John Conte; Brijeshwar Maini; Mubashir Mumtaz; Sharla Chenoweth; Jae K Oh Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2014-03-29 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Ronald K Binder; John G Webb; Alexander B Willson; Marina Urena; Nicolaj C Hansson; Bjarne L Norgaard; Philippe Pibarot; Marco Barbanti; Eric Larose; Melanie Freeman; Eric Dumont; Chris Thompson; Miriam Wheeler; Robert R Moss; Tae-hyun Yang; Sergio Pasian; Cameron J Hague; Giang Nguyen; Rekha Raju; Stefan Toggweiler; James K Min; David A Wood; Josep Rodés-Cabau; Jonathon Leipsic Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2013-05-15 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Martin B Leon; Craig R Smith; Michael J Mack; Raj R Makkar; Lars G Svensson; Susheel K Kodali; Vinod H Thourani; E Murat Tuzcu; D Craig Miller; Howard C Herrmann; Darshan Doshi; David J Cohen; Augusto D Pichard; Samir Kapadia; Todd Dewey; Vasilis Babaliaros; Wilson Y Szeto; Mathew R Williams; Dean Kereiakes; Alan Zajarias; Kevin L Greason; Brian K Whisenant; Robert W Hodson; Jeffrey W Moses; Alfredo Trento; David L Brown; William F Fearon; Philippe Pibarot; Rebecca T Hahn; Wael A Jaber; William N Anderson; Maria C Alu; John G Webb Journal: N Engl J Med Date: 2016-04-02 Impact factor: 91.245
Authors: Lisa Q Rong; Irbaz Hameed; Arash Salemi; Mohamed Rahouma; Faiza M Khan; Harindra C Wijeysundera; Dominick J Angiolillo; Linda Shore-Lesserson; Giuseppe Biondi-Zoccai; Leonard N Girardi; Stephen E Fremes; Mario Gaudino Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2019-09-24 Impact factor: 5.501