| Literature DB >> 28345060 |
Ren-Mao Tian1, Weipeng Zhang1, Lin Cai1, Yue-Him Wong1, Wei Ding1, Pei-Yuan Qian1.
Abstract
As the most ancient metazoan, sponges have established close relationships with particular microbial symbionts. However, the characteristics and physiology of thioautotrophic symbionts in deep-sea sponges are largely unknown. Using a tailored "differential coverage binning" method on 22-Gb metagenomic sequences, we recovered the nearly complete genome of a sulfur-oxidizing bacterium (SOB) that dominates the microbiota of the cold seep sponge Suberites sp. Phylogenetic analyses suggested that this bacterium (an unclassified gammaproteobacterium termed "Gsub") may represent a new deep-sea SOB group. Microscopic observations suggest that Gsub is probably an extracellular symbiont. Gsub has complete sulfide oxidation and carbon fixation pathways, suggesting a chemoautotrophic lifestyle. Comparative genomics with other sponge-associated SOB and free-living SOB revealed significant genome reduction in Gsub, characterized by the loss of genes for carbohydrate metabolism, motility, DNA repair, and osmotic stress response. Intriguingly, this scenario of genome reduction is highly similar to those of the endosymbionts in deep-sea clams. However, Gsub has retained genes for phage defense and protein secretion, with the latter potentially playing a role in interactions with the sponge host. In addition, we recovered the genome of an ammonia-oxidizing archaeon (AOA), which may carry out ammonia oxidation and carbon fixation within the sponge body. IMPORTANCE Sponges and their symbionts are important players in the biogeochemical cycles of marine environments. As a unique habitat within marine ecosystems, cold seeps have received considerable interest in recent years. This study explores the lifestyle of a new symbiotic SOB in a cold seep sponge. The results demonstrate that both this sponge symbiont and endosymbionts in deep-sea clams employ similar strategies of genome reduction. However, this bacterium has retained unique functions for immunity and defense. Thus, the functional features are determined by both the symbiotic relationship and host type. Moreover, analyses of the genome of an AOA suggest that microbes play different roles in biochemical cycles in the sponge body. Our findings provide new insights into invertebrate-associated bacteria in cold seep environments.Entities:
Keywords: cold seep; genome analysis; sponge; symbiont
Year: 2017 PMID: 28345060 PMCID: PMC5361782 DOI: 10.1128/mSystems.00184-16
Source DB: PubMed Journal: mSystems ISSN: 2379-5077 Impact factor: 6.496
FIG 1 Microbial community composition of the samples, including external and internal tissues, sponge cell- and prokaryotic cell-enriched samples. The red block represented the Gsub bacterium in the present study. The sequencing coverages of the contigs where the 16S rRNA genes located were taken as the coverages of the 16S rRNA genes and were considered their relative abundance. The lowest assigned taxonomic levels are shown. The phylum names and the class names for Proteobacteria are shown in parentheses.
FIG 2 Maximum likelihood (ML) unrooted tree based on the full-length 16S rRNA genes (A) and 31 conserved single-copy genes (B) showing the phylogenetic position of the Gsub bacterium and its close relatives. GenBank accession numbers of the reference sequences are shown in parentheses, and the Gsub bacterium is found to be closely related to the cluster of endosymbionts of the deep-sea clam, with the highest 16S rRNA gene identity of 94.5% to “Candidatus Ruthia magnifica” strain Cm. The black circles indicate the reference genomes involved in the subsequent genomic comparison. Bootstrap values of >70% are shown. The length of the branch in the horizontal dimension indicates the amount of change in the evolutionary lineage. The bars at the bottom of panels A and B represent 0.02 and 0.05 nucleotide substitutions per position. aff., affiliated; str., strain.
Comparison of the genome features among the sulfur-oxidizing bacterium (SOB) in the cold seep sponge (Gsub) and reference genomes
| Genome feature | Gsub | Rmag | Voku | Glop | Ghal | Tsul | Tcru |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Habitat | Deep-sea sponge | Deep-sea clam | Deep-sea clam | Deep-sea sponge | Shallow-water sponge | Shallow water free-living | Deep-sea free-living |
| Accession no. | |||||||
| Completeness (%) | 98.00 | 94.16 | 94.19 | 94.51 | 99.56 | 99.89 | 99.39 |
| Potential contamination (%) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2.44 | 1.01 | 0.34 | 0 |
| Total length (Mbp) | 1.4 | 1.2 | 1.0 | 2.7 | 3.5 | 3.5 | 2.4 |
| No. of protein-coding genes | 1,370 | 1,076 | 939 | 2,506 | 2,741 | 3,319 | 2,201 |
| No. of tRNA genes | 36 | 36 | 36 | 43 | 44 | 48 | 44 |
| Reduced features | |||||||
| No. of genes involved in: | |||||||
| Monosaccharide metabolism | 4 | 4 | 3 | 10 | 32 | 17 | 12 |
| Sugar alcohol metabolism | 2 | 2 | 2 | 17 | 21 | 8 | 3 |
| Oligosaccharide metabolism | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 8 | 11 | 11 |
| Motility and chemotaxis | 4 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 9 | 65 | 76 |
| Resistance to toxic compounds and heavy metals | 14 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 23 | 57 | 55 |
| Oxidative stress | 14 | 11 | 13 | 22 | 20 | 27 | 17 |
| Osmotic stress | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 5 | 9 |
| DNA repair | 31 | 21 | 16 | 39 | 39 | 46 | 36 |
| Retained features | |||||||
| No. of type II secretion system genes | 11 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 12 | 12 |
| No. of CRISPR sites | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| No. of CRISPR spacers | 16 | 0 | 0 | 191 | 0 | 71 | 0 |
| No. of CRISPR protein | 2 | 0 | 0 | 14 | 4 | 5 | 0 |
The reference genomes include two endosymbionts from vent clams, “Candidatus Ruthia magnifica” strain Cm (Rmag) and “Candidatus Vesicomyosocius okutanii” strain (Voku), two extracellular SOB in sponges, the SOB in the deep-sea glass sponge Lophophysema (Glop) and in the shallow water sponge Haliclona (Ghal), and two free-living relative SOB, Thioalkalivibrio sulfidophilus HL-EbGr7 (Tsul) from shallow water and Thiomicrospira crunogena XCL-2 (Tcru) from the deep sea.
FIG 3 Comparison of functions between the Gsub bacterium and the reference genomes. (A) Venn diagram showing the distribution of Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) genes in the Gsub, Rmag, Voku, Tcru, and Tsul bacteria. (B) Venn diagram showing the distribution of KEGG genes in the Gsub, Glop, Ghal, Tcru, and Tsul bacteria. (C) Heatmap and clustering of the functional profile (first level of SEED subsystem) in the genomes of Gsub and reference bacteria. The genomes of Gsub, Rmag, and Voku contain lower numbers of genes for carbohydrate metabolism and respiration, cofactor synthesis, cell signaling and regulation, virulence factors, motility and chemotaxis, stress response, and membrane transport.
Comparison of detailed genomic features on the resistance to toxic compounds and heavy metals, oxidative stress, osmotic stress, and DNA repair in the bacterium Gsub genome and reference bacteria
| Gene category and annotation | No. of genes in the following bacterium with the indicated genes: | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gsub | Rmag | Voku | Glop | Ghal | Tsul | Tcru | |
| Resistance to toxic compounds and heavy metals | |||||||
| Copper homeostasis | 2 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 7 |
| Multidrug resistance efflux pumps | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 6 | 11 | 11 |
| Cobalt-zinc-cadmium resistance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 21 | 25 |
| Resistance to fluoroquinolones | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 |
| Copper tolerance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 2 |
| Zinc resistance | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Multidrug resistance, tripartite systems | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
| Beta-lactamase | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 2 |
| Multidrug efflux pump (CmeABC operon) | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 |
| Methicillin resistance | 2 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 1 | 1 |
| Arsenic resistance | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 1 |
| Subtotal | 14 | 14 | 14 | 17 | 23 | 57 | 55 |
| Oxidative stress | |||||||
| Rubrerythrin | 4 | 1 | 2 | 4 | 3 | 6 | 2 |
| Glutathione: biosynthesis and gamma-glutamyl cycle | 3 | 2 | 3 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 5 |
| Redox-dependent regulation of nucleus processes | 0 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 2 |
| Glutaredoxins | 3 | 3 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 2 |
| Glutathione | |||||||
| Nonredox reactions | 1 | 2 | 1 | 5 | 7 | 3 | 4 |
| Redox cycle | 3 | 3 | 3 | 3 | 1 | 6 | 2 |
| Subtotal | 14 | 11 | 13 | 22 | 20 | 27 | 17 |
| Osmotic stress | |||||||
| Betaine biosynthesis from glycine | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 |
| Ectoine biosynthesis and regulation | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 |
| Choline and betaine uptake | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 3 | 4 |
| Subtotal | 0 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 | 5 | 9 |
| DNA repair | |||||||
| MutL-MutS system | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 |
| Bacterial DNA repair | 10 | 7 | 4 | 16 | 15 | 18 | 12 |
| RecFOR pathway | 5 | 1 | 1 | 6 | 8 | 7 | 6 |
| Base excision | 7 | 6 | 6 | 7 | 6 | 8 | 5 |
| UvrABC system | 3 | 3 | 1 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
| UvrD and related helicases | 3 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 2 | 3 |
| DinG and relatives | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| 2-Phosphoglycolate salvage | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 3 |
| Subtotal | 31 | 21 | 16 | 39 | 39 | 46 | 36 |
Genes were annotated using the SEED database.
Predicted clustered regularly interspaced short palindromic repeats in the bacterium Gsub genome
| CRISPR ID | Avg length of repeats (bp) | Repeat sequence | Spacer sequence | Length of spacer (bp) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CRISPR 1 | 34 | TGTATTGGTTTGAATATCATCAACTGTTGCTGTT | GCTGATGCTCGTAAATTATCAATTGCATCGGCATTGGTCGTTATATTGCT | 50 |
| TGTATTGGTTTGAATATCATCAACTGTTGCTGTT | ACTGAGGTTTGTAAGGTGTTAATTGCTGTTGTATTGTTTGTAACATTACC | 50 | ||
| TGTATTGGTTTGAATATCATCAACTGTTGCTGTT | ||||
| CRISPR 2 | 36 | GTTGTGATTTGCGTTTAGGCAATAGTCTGTTACAAT | TTTGGCTATTCCTGGTTTTCTGCTCATTAG | 30 |
| GTTGTGATTTGCGTTTAGGCAATAGTCTGTTACAAT | AAAATATATATTCAATAAAAGACAACAAAG | 30 | ||
| GTTGTGATTTGCGTTTAGGCAATAGTCTGTTACAAT | CAGCAAGTTATTCTGCTAAATACATCACTG | 30 | ||
| GTTGTGATTTGCGTTTAGGCAATAGTCTGTTACAAT | TTAGTATCATTTTTTACCCCCTTGTTTAAA | 30 | ||
| GTTGTGATTTGCGTTTAGGCAATAGTCTGTTACAAT | ||||
| CRISPR 3 | 36 | ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | AATGGTAGCAATGCTATTAGTTTTACAGAT | 30 |
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAATCGCAAATCACAAC | AAACTCACAAGGGTTAGTGATTATCGTCTT | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | TTAACTCCTTAAAGGTGCGAATATGTATAG | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | GCCTCAATTAAGCACACGGCAGGCCTACTC | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | ACAAAATTAGGCAAAGTATGAAAGAAAAA | 29 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | CACCTTACGAATTGCTTGTTGCCAAACAA | 29 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | TGTACAGTGCTTTTTCTGTTTCACGAATGA | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | CGAATGATTTTCATTTTGTTGTCTCCTTTA | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | CGAATGATTTTCATTTTGTTGTCTCCTTTA | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC | TAATATACTTAGCTGAATAGCTCGCTGTTA | 30 | ||
| ATTGTAACAGACTATTGCCTAAACGCAAATCACAAC |
Clustered regularly interspaced palindromic repeats (CRISPR) identification (ID).