Literature DB >> 28344445

Effects of Static and Dynamic Stretching on the Isokinetic Peak Torques and Electromyographic Activities of the Antagonist Muscles.

Abdullah Serefoglu1, Ufuk Sekir1, Hakan Gür1, Bedrettin Akova1.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate if static and dynamic stretching exercises of the knee muscles (quadriceps and hamstring muscles) have any effects on concentric and eccentric isokinetic peak torques and electromyographic amplitudes (EMG) of the antagonist muscles. Twenty healthy male athletes (age between 18-30 years) voluntarily participated in this study. All of the subjects visited the laboratory to complete the following intervention in a randomized order on 5 separate days; (a) non-stretching (control), (b) static stretching of the quadriceps muscles, (c) static stretching of the hamstring muscles, (d) dynamic stretching of the quadriceps muscles, and (e) dynamic stretching of the hamstring muscles. Static stretching exercises either for the quadriceps or the hamstring muscles were carried out at the standing and sitting positions. Subjects performed four successive repetitions of each stretching exercises for 30 seconds in both stretching positions. Similar to static stretching exercises two different stretching modes were designed for dynamic stretching exercises. Concentric and eccentric isokinetic peak torque for the non-stretched antagonist quadriceps or hamstring muscles at angular velocities of 60°/sec and 240°/sec and their concurrent electromyographic (EMG) activities were measured before and immediately after the intervention. Isokinetic peak torques of the non-stretched agonist hamstring and quadriceps muscles did not represent any significant (p > 0.05) differences following static and dynamic stretching of the antagonist quadriceps and hamstring muscles, respectively. Similarly, the EMG activities of the agonist muscles exhibited no significant alterations (p > 0.05) following both stretching exercises of the antagonist muscles. According to the results of the present study it is possible to state that antagonist stretching exercises either in the static or dynamic modes do not affect the isokinetic peak torques and the EMG activities of the non-stretched agonist quadriceps or hamstring muscles.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Antagonist muscle; EMG; strength; stretching

Year:  2017        PMID: 28344445      PMCID: PMC5358032     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci Med        ISSN: 1303-2968            Impact factor:   2.988


  28 in total

1.  The acute effects of static stretching on peak torque, mean power output, electromyography, and mechanomyography.

Authors:  J T Cramer; T J Housh; J P Weir; G O Johnson; J W Coburn; T W Beck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2004-12-15       Impact factor: 3.078

2.  Effects of static stretching for 30 seconds and dynamic stretching on leg extension power.

Authors:  Taichi Yamaguchi; Kojiro Ishii
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2005-08       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Acute effects of dynamic stretching exercise on power output during concentric dynamic constant external resistance leg extension.

Authors:  Taichi Yamaguchi; Kojiro Ishii; Masanori Yamanaka; Kazunori Yasuda
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 3.775

4.  Acute effects of static and dynamic stretching on leg flexor and extensor isokinetic strength in elite women athletes.

Authors:  U Sekir; R Arabaci; B Akova; S M Kadagan
Journal:  Scand J Med Sci Sports       Date:  2009-04-15       Impact factor: 4.221

5.  Acute effects of static versus dynamic stretching on isometric peak torque, electromyography, and mechanomyography of the biceps femoris muscle.

Authors:  Trent J Herda; Joel T Cramer; Eric D Ryan; Malachy P McHugh; Jeffrey R Stout
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2008-05       Impact factor: 3.775

6.  Unilateral plantar flexors static-stretching effects on ipsilateral and contralateral jump measures.

Authors:  Josinaldo Jarbas da Silva; David George Behm; Willy Andrade Gomes; Fernando Henrique Domingues de Oliveira Silva; Enrico Gori Soares; Érica Paes Serpa; Guanis de Barros Vilela Junior; Charles Ricardo Lopes; Paulo Henrique Marchetti
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2015-05-08       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Unilateral static and dynamic hamstrings stretching increases contralateral hip flexion range of motion.

Authors:  Anis Chaouachi; Johnny Padulo; Sofien Kasmi; Aymen Ben Othmen; Moktar Chatra; David G Behm
Journal:  Clin Physiol Funct Imaging       Date:  2015-05-27       Impact factor: 2.273

8.  Changes in hip flexor passive compliance do not account for improvement in vertical jump performance after hip flexor static stretching.

Authors:  C Brent Wakefield; G Trevor Cottrell
Journal:  J Strength Cond Res       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.775

9.  Acute effects of antagonist static stretching in the inter-set rest period on repetition performance and muscle activation.

Authors:  Humberto Miranda; Marianna de Freitas Maia; Gabriel Andrade Paz; Pablo B Costa
Journal:  Res Sports Med       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.674

10.  Antagonist muscle co-activation of limbs in human infant crawling: A pilot study.

Authors:  Qi L Xiong; Xiao Y Wu; Nong Xiao; Si Y Zeng; Xiao P Wan; Xiao L Zheng; Wen S Hou
Journal:  Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc       Date:  2015
View more
  1 in total

1.  No effect of passive stretching on neuromuscular function and maximum force-generating capacity in the antagonist muscle.

Authors:  Emiliano Cè; Giuseppe Coratella; Christian Doria; Susanna Rampichini; Marta Borrelli; Stefano Longo; Fabio Esposito
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 3.078

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.