Literature DB >> 28343269

Neophobia is negatively related to reversal learning ability in females of a generalist bird of prey, the Chimango Caracara, Milvago chimango.

Jorgelina María Guido1, Laura Marina Biondi2, Aldo Ivan Vasallo3, Rubén Nestor Muzio4.   

Abstract

In an ever-changing environment, the ability to adapt choices to new conditions is essential for daily living and ultimately, for survival. Behavioural flexibility allows animals to maximise survival and reproduction in novel settings by adjusting their behaviour based on specific information and feedback acquired in their current environments. However, a growing body of evidence indicates that an individual's personality type can limit the extent to which the individual might behave flexibly, by influencing the way an individual pays attention to novelty and how much information it collects and stores, which in turn affects the individual's decision-making and learning process. In this study, the behavioural flexibility of a generalist predator, the Chimango Caracara, Milvago chimango, was analysed using the reversal learning paradigm, focusing on the comparison between age classes, and the relation of learning flexibility with a personality trait, the level of neophobia. Due to the low number of male individuals captured, this study was carried out only with female birds. The results showed that age had no significant effect either on the acquisition of a stimulus-reward association, or on the capacity of reversing this previously learned association. Reversal of the response was a harder task for these birds in comparison with the initial acquisition process. The individual's performances in the learning tasks seemed to be uncorrelated with each other, suggesting that they involve different neural mechanisms. Contrary to the general pattern observed in the majority of previous work on personality and cognition in non-human animals, the level of neophobia did not correlate with the initial associative learning performance in both adults and juveniles, yet it showed a significant negative relationship with reversal learning ability, mainly in the regressive phase of this task, for the two age classes. Our results suggest that the predatory and generalist lifestyle of female individuals of M. chimango along with the selective pressures of the environment of the individuals studied might play a critical role in the degree and direction of the linkage between novelty response and learning flexibility observed in this study.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Behavioral flexibility; Chimango Caracara; Learning; Neophobia

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28343269     DOI: 10.1007/s10071-017-1083-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anim Cogn        ISSN: 1435-9448            Impact factor:   3.084


  8 in total

1.  Behavioural factors underlying innovative problem-solving differences in an avian predator from two contrasting habitats.

Authors:  Laura Marina Biondi; Giselle Fuentes; Maria Susana
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2021-10-28       Impact factor: 3.084

2.  Bold and bright: shy and supple? The effect of habitat type on personality-cognition covariance in the Aegean wall lizard (Podarcis erhardii).

Authors:  Gilles De Meester; Panayiotis Pafilis; Raoul Van Damme
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-01-17       Impact factor: 2.899

3.  Assessing sex differences in behavioural flexibility in an endangered bird species: the Southern ground-hornbill (Bucorvus leadbeateri).

Authors:  Samara Danel; Nancy Rebout; Lucy Kemp
Journal:  Anim Cogn       Date:  2022-10-17       Impact factor: 2.899

4.  Heritabilities and co-variation among cognitive traits in red junglefowl.

Authors:  Enrico Sorato; Josefina Zidar; Laura Garnham; Alastair Wilson; Hanne Løvlie
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  2018-09-26       Impact factor: 6.237

5.  Multiple factors affect discrimination learning performance, but not between-individual variation, in wild mixed-species flocks of birds.

Authors:  Michael S Reichert; Sam J Crofts; Gabrielle L Davidson; Josh A Firth; Ipek G Kulahci; John L Quinn
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2020-04-29       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Are some individuals generally more behaviorally plastic than others? An experiment with sailfin mollies.

Authors:  Julie Gibelli; Nadia Aubin-Horth; Frédérique Dubois
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2018-08-07       Impact factor: 2.984

7.  Cognition in the field: comparison of reversal learning performance in captive and wild passerines.

Authors:  M Cauchoix; E Hermer; A S Chaine; J Morand-Ferron
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Modelling the evolution of cognitive styles.

Authors:  Jannis Liedtke; Lutz Fromhage
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2019-12-27       Impact factor: 3.260

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.