Literature DB >> 28341746

Leveraging sequence-based faecal microbial community survey data to identify a composite biomarker for colorectal cancer.

Manasi S Shah1,2,3,4, Todd Z DeSantis2, Thomas Weinmaier2, Paul J McMurdie2,5, Julia L Cope3,4,6, Adam Altrichter2, Jose-Miguel Yamal1, Emily B Hollister3,4.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is the second leading cause of cancer-associated mortality in the USA. The faecal microbiome may provide non-invasive biomarkers of CRC and indicate transition in the adenoma-carcinoma sequence. Re-analysing raw sequence and metadata from several studies uniformly, we sought to identify a composite and generalisable microbial marker for CRC.
DESIGN: Raw 16S rRNA gene sequence data sets from nine studies were processed with two pipelines, (1) QIIME closed reference (QIIME-CR) or (2) a strain-specific method herein termed SS-UP (Strain Select, UPARSE bioinformatics pipeline). A total of 509 samples (79 colorectal adenoma, 195 CRC and 235 controls) were analysed. Differential abundance, meta-analysis random effects regression and machine learning analyses were carried out to determine the consistency and diagnostic capabilities of potential microbial biomarkers.
RESULTS: Definitive taxa, including Parvimonas micra ATCC 33270, Streptococcus anginosus and yet-to-be-cultured members of Proteobacteria, were frequently and significantly increased in stools from patients with CRC compared with controls across studies and had high discriminatory capacity in diagnostic classification. Microbiome-based CRC versus control classification produced an area under receiver operator characteristic (AUROC) curve of 76.6% in QIIME-CR and 80.3% in SS-UP. Combining clinical and microbiome markers gave a diagnostic AUROC of 83.3% for QIIME-CR and 91.3% for SS-UP.
CONCLUSIONS: Despite technological differences across studies and methods, key microbial markers emerged as important in classifying CRC cases and such could be used in a universal diagnostic for the disease. The choice of bioinformatics pipeline influenced accuracy of classification. Strain-resolved microbial markers might prove crucial in providing a microbial diagnostic for CRC. Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://www.bmj.com/company/products-services/rights-and-licensing/.

Entities:  

Keywords:  COLORECTAL ADENOMAS; COLORECTAL CANCER; INTESTINAL BACTERIA; META-ANALYSIS

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28341746     DOI: 10.1136/gutjnl-2016-313189

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gut        ISSN: 0017-5749            Impact factor:   23.059


  61 in total

Review 1.  Gut microbiome, big data and machine learning to promote precision medicine for cancer.

Authors:  Giovanni Cammarota; Gianluca Ianiro; Anna Ahern; Carmine Carbone; Andriy Temko; Marcus J Claesson; Antonio Gasbarrini; Giampaolo Tortora
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2020-07-09       Impact factor: 46.802

2.  Transmission and clearance of potential procarcinogenic bacteria during fecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile.

Authors:  Julia L Drewes; Alina Corona; Uriel Sanchez; Yunfan Fan; Suchitra K Hourigan; Melissa Weidner; Sarah D Sidhu; Patricia J Simner; Hao Wang; Winston Timp; Maria Oliva-Hemker; Cynthia L Sears
Journal:  JCI Insight       Date:  2019-10-03

3.  Reticulocalbin 2 correlates with recurrence and prognosis in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Gang Wang; Qian Wang; Yongguo Fan; Xianli He
Journal:  Am J Cancer Res       Date:  2017-11-01       Impact factor: 6.166

4.  Specific gut microbiome signature predicts the early-stage lung cancer.

Authors:  Yajuan Zheng; Zhaoyuan Fang; Yun Xue; Jian Zhang; Junjie Zhu; Renyuan Gao; Shun Yao; Yi Ye; Shihui Wang; Changdong Lin; Shiyang Chen; Hsinyi Huang; Liang Hu; Ge-Ning Jiang; Huanlong Qin; Peng Zhang; Jianfeng Chen; Hongbin Ji
Journal:  Gut Microbes       Date:  2020-04-02

5.  Structure of the Mucosal and Stool Microbiome in Lynch Syndrome.

Authors:  Yan Yan; David A Drew; Arnold Markowitz; Jason Lloyd-Price; Galeb Abu-Ali; Long H Nguyen; Christina Tran; Daniel C Chung; Katherine K Gilpin; Dana Meixell; Melanie Parziale; Madeline Schuck; Zalak Patel; James M Richter; Peter B Kelsey; Wendy S Garrett; Andrew T Chan; Zsofia K Stadler; Curtis Huttenhower
Journal:  Cell Host Microbe       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 21.023

6.  Diet, Gut Microbiota, and Colorectal Cancer Prevention: A Review of Potential Mechanisms and Promising Targets for Future Research.

Authors:  Mingyang Song; Andrew T Chan
Journal:  Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep       Date:  2017-09-04

7.  Dysbiosis of the gut microbiota and colorectal cancer: the key target of molecular pathological epidemiology.

Authors:  Keisuke Kosumi; Kosuke Mima; Hideo Baba; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  J Lab Precis Med       Date:  2018-09-25

Review 8.  Influence of the Gut Microbiome, Diet, and Environment on Risk of Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Mingyang Song; Andrew T Chan; Jun Sun
Journal:  Gastroenterology       Date:  2019-10-03       Impact factor: 22.682

Review 9.  Reimagining the diagnostic pathway for gastrointestinal cancer.

Authors:  Greg Rubin; Fiona Walter; Jon Emery; Niek de Wit
Journal:  Nat Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol       Date:  2018-02-07       Impact factor: 46.802

10.  Randomised clinical study: oral aspirin 325 mg daily vs placebo alters gut microbial composition and bacterial taxa associated with colorectal cancer risk.

Authors:  Anna E Prizment; Christopher Staley; Guillaume C Onyeaghala; Sithara Vivek; Bharat Thyagarajan; Robert J Straka; Ryan T Demmer; Dan Knights; Katie A Meyer; Aasma Shaukat; Michael J Sadowsky; Timothy R Church
Journal:  Aliment Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2020-08-08       Impact factor: 8.171

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.