| Literature DB >> 28341737 |
Yuan Zhou1,2,3, Yongzheng He2,3, Wen Xing1,2,3, Peng Zhang4,5, Hui Shi1,4,5, Shi Chen4,5, Jun Shi1, Jie Bai1, Steven D Rhodes2,3, Fengqui Zhang1, Jin Yuan2,3, Xianlin Yang2,3, Xiaofan Zhu1, Yan Li2,3, Helmut Hanenberg2,3,6, Mingjiang Xu4,5, Kent A Robertson2,3, Weiping Yuan1, Grzegorz Nalepa2,3, Tao Cheng1, D Wade Clapp7,3, Feng-Chun Yang8,5.
Abstract
Fanconi anemia is a complex heterogeneous genetic disorder with a high incidence of bone marrow failure, clonal evolution to acute myeloid leukemia and mesenchymal-derived congenital anomalies. Increasing evidence in Fanconi anemia and other genetic disorders points towards an interdependence of skeletal and hematopoietic development, yet the impact of the marrow microenvironment in the pathogenesis of the bone marrow failure in Fanconi anemia remains unclear. Here we demonstrated that mice with double knockout of both Fancc and Fancg genes had decreased bone formation at least partially due to impaired osteoblast differentiation from mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells from the double knockout mice showed impaired hematopoietic supportive activity. Mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells of patients with Fanconi anemia exhibited similar cellular deficits, including increased senescence, reduced proliferation, impaired osteoblast differentiation and defective hematopoietic stem/progenitor cell supportive activity. Collectively, these studies provide unique insights into the physiological significance of mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in supporting the marrow microenvironment, which is potentially of broad relevance in hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Copyright© Ferrata Storti Foundation.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28341737 PMCID: PMC5451333 DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2016.158717
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Haematologica ISSN: 0390-6078 Impact factor: 9.941
Figure 1.Poor survival and hematopoietic defects in double knockout mice. (A) Survival curves of WT and DKO recipients following transplantation with either WT (n = 11) or DKO (n = 11) BM cells were monitored over a duration of 20 months. (P<0.01, log-rank test). (B) Total number of colony-forming unit-cells (CFU-C) in five sets of DKO as compared to WT recipient mice transplanted with either WT or DKO BM cells; data are presented as mean ± SEM, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test. (C) Representative photomicrographs demonstrated BM histology of recipient mice 15 months post-transplantation at low (10×, a–d) and high (40×, e–h) magnification. Scale bar: 100 μm for a–d, and 10 μm for e–h. (D) Representative H&E-stained sections of spleens from transplanted recipients are shown at low (10×, a–d) and high (40×, e–h) magnification. Scale bar: 100 μm for a–d, and 10 μm for e–h. (E) Representative May-Grünwald-Giemsa stained peripheral blood smears of transplanted recipient mice are shown. The peripheral blood smear of DKO recipient mice with WT or DKO BM cells showed dysplastic features including monocytes (f–h, green arrows) and bilobed neutrophils (b–d, red arrows) which were consistent with pseudo Pelger-Huët cells. Scale bar: 10 μm.
Figure 2.Double knockout mice had retarded growth and impaired bone mineralization. (A) DKO mice had decreased whole body bone mineral density (BMD) (n=20 mice per genotype) as compared to WT mice. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, **P<0.01, two-tailed Student t-test. (B) DKO mice had decreased BMD as compared to WT littermates at varying ages. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (C) Micro-computed tomography demonstrated that DKO mice had reduced femoral trabecular bone volume as compared to WT mice (n=8 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM of bone volume per tissue volume (BV/TV), *P<0.05, two-tailed Student t-test. (D) Representative micro-computed tomography reconstructions of WT and DKO mouse femora. Scale bar: 1 mm. (E) Representative H&E (a–d) and McNeal staining (e–h) analysis of the femora of WT and DKO mice. Red arrows indicate the osteoblasts on the bone surface. Scale bar: 200 μm for a, c, e, g and 50 μm for b, d, f, h. (F) DKO mice had reduced numbers of osteoblasts on the trabecular bone surface (Ob.No./BS) as compared to WT mice (n=20 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, two-tailed Student t-test. (G) DKO mice had increased osteoclasts along the trabecular bone surface (Oc.S/BS) as compared to WT mice (n=8 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, two-tailed Student t-test. (H, I) Bone remodeling studies demonstrated that DKO mice had reduced MS/BS and MAR as compared to WT mice (n=3 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, two-tailed Student t-test.
Figure 3.In vitro analysis of mesenchymal stem progenitor cell frequency and osteoblast differentiation. (A) The frequency of CFU-F per 4×106 BMMNC from WT and DKO mice is shown (n=9 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (B) Significant reduction of CFU-F in DKO mice at different cell passages (n=9 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (C) The frequency of CFU-osteoblasts in WT and DKO mice is shown (n=5 mice per genotype). Alkaline phosphatase staining of WT and DKO BMMNC cultured in osteogenic medium. Data are presented as mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (D) The ratio of Oil Red O-positive adipocytes to total colonies demonstrated enhanced adipocyte differentiation in DKO mice compared to WT ones (n=5 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, **P<0.01, two-tailed Student t-test. Scale bar: 100 μm (E) Significantly reduced Runx2, Cdh2 and increased Ppar-γ gene expression in DKO MSPC as compared to WT controls (n=5 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, two-tailed Student t-test.
Figure 4.Co-culture of double knockout mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells with hematopoietic stem/progenitor cells showed the decreased hematopoietic supportive activity. (A, B) DKO MSPC had reduced hematopoietic supportive activity as compared with WT MSPC (n=3 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test. (C, D) DKO MSPC supported HSC cultures contained higher percentages of the Gr1+/Mac1+ population and apoptotic CD45+ cells (n=3 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, ***P<0.001, two-way ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni test. (E) MSPC-conditioned medium, adipocyte-conditioned medium, and the serum of DKO mice contained significantly increased concentrations of tumor necrosis-α (TNF-α) as compared with WT mice (n=3 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, *P<0.05, **P<0.01, two-tailed Student t-test. (F) A marked reduction of the interleukin-6 (IL6) level was observed in DKO MSPC conditioned medium (n=3 mice per genotype). Data are presented as mean ± SEM, ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test.
Figure 5.Impaired cellular functions of Fanconi anemia patient-derived mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells. (A) FA MSPC were more sensitive to mitomycin C (MMC). Data are presented as mean ± SEM and represent one of four independent experiments. (B) FA MSPC had an increased rate of senescence as compared to control MSPC. Data are shown as mean ± SEM from triplicate wells (5 fields/well) and represent one of four independent experiments. ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (C) Representative images demonstrating alkaline phosphatase (ALP) staining of a healthy donor and FA MSPC cultured in the osteogenic medium surface. (D) FA MSPC had impaired osteoblast differentiation. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate wells (6 fields/well) and represent one of four independent experiments. ***P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. (E, F) FA MSPC had impaired hematopoietic supportive activity. Data are presented as mean ± SEM from triplicate wells and represent one of four independent experiments. *** P<0.001, two-tailed Student t-test. Each experiment was performed with a different MSPC culture isolated from the individual patient.