Literature DB >> 28340503

Risk factors for lymph node metastases in women with endometrial cancer: A population-based, nation-wide register study-On behalf of the Swedish Gynecological Cancer Group.

K Stålberg1, P Kjølhede2,3, M Bjurberg4,5, C Borgfeldt6, P Dahm-Kähler7, H Falconer8, E Holmberg9,10, C Staf11, B Tholander12, E Åvall-Lundqvist13,14,15, P Rosenberg16, T Högberg17.   

Abstract

The role of lymphadenectomy in the management of early endometrial cancer remains controversial. In the recent ESMO-ESGO-ESTRO guidelines, lymphadenectomy is recommended for patients with endometrioid adenocarcinoma Grade 3 with deep myometrial invasion, but complete agreement was not achieved. In Sweden, DNA aneuploidy has been included as a high-risk factor. The aim of our study was to evaluate the impact of tumor histology, FIGO grade, DNA ploidy and myometrial invasion (MI) on occurrence of lymph node metastasis (LNM) in patients with endometrial cancer. The study design is a retrospective cohort study based on prospectively recorded register data. Endometrial cancer patients registered in the Swedish Quality Registry for Gynecologic Cancer 2010-2015 with FIGO Stages I-III and verified nodal status were included. Data on DNA ploidy, histology, FIGO grade and MI were included in multivariable log-binomial regression analyses with LNM as dependent variable. 1,165 cases fulfilled the inclusion criteria. The multivariable analyses revealed increased risk of LNM in patients with tumors with MI ≥ 50% (risk ratio [RR] = 4.1; 95% confidence interval [CI] 3.0-5.6), nonendometrioid compared to endometrioid histology (RR 1.8; CI 1.4-2.4) and FIGO Grade 3 compared to Grade 1-2 tumors (RR 1.5; CI 1.1-2.0). No statistically significant association between DNA ploidy status and LNM was detected. This population-based, nation-wide study in women with endometrial cancer confirms a strong association between MI ≥ 50%, nonendometrioid histology and FIGO Grade 3, respectively, and LNM. DNA ploidy should not be included in the preoperative decision making of removing nodes or not.
© 2017 UICC.

Entities:  

Keywords:  endometrial cancer; epidemiology; lymph node metastases; risk factor

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28340503     DOI: 10.1002/ijc.30707

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Int J Cancer        ISSN: 0020-7136            Impact factor:   7.396


  4 in total

1.  Predicting Factors for Pelvic Lymph Node Metastasis in Patients with Apparently Early-Stage Endometrial Cancer.

Authors:  Pariyed Gumtorntip; Yenrudee Poomtavorn; Chamnan Tanprasertkul
Journal:  Asian Pac J Cancer Prev       Date:  2022-02-01

2.  Cervical invasion, lymphovascular space invasion, and ovarian metastasis as predictors of lymph node metastasis and poor outcome on stages I to III endometrial cancers: a single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Min Li; Shuwei Wu; Yangqin Xie; Xiaohui Zhang; Zhanyu Wang; Ying Zhu; Shijie Yan
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-11-16       Impact factor: 2.754

3.  A nomogram prediction model for lymph node metastasis in endometrial cancer patients.

Authors:  Zhiling Wang; Shuo Zhang; Yifei Ma; Wenhui Li; Jiguang Tian; Ting Liu
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-06-29       Impact factor: 4.430

4.  Expression of EZH2 in endometrial carcinoma and its effects on proliferation and invasion of endometrial carcinoma cells.

Authors:  Yuting Gu; Jing Zhang; Huai Guan
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2017-10-11       Impact factor: 3.111

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.