| Literature DB >> 29344151 |
Yuting Gu1, Jing Zhang1, Huai Guan1.
Abstract
Expression of enhancer of zeste homolog 2 (EZH2) has been implicated in cancer pathology, but research on its mechanistic activity is limited. The present study sought to assess the levels expression of EZH2 in patients with endometrial carcinoma (EC) and to explore the effects of EZH2 downregulation on the biological behavior of endometrial carcinoma RL-952 cells. Samples were obtained from a total of 104 patients with EC and an immunohistochemical assay was used to detect the expression of EZH2 in cancer and adjacent tissues. The relationship between the expression of EZH2 and the clinicopathological features was analyzed. Endometrial carcinoma RL-952 cells were transfected with chemically synthesized siRNA to conduct targeting inhibition of EZH2 expression. The expression levels of EZH2 protein were detected by immunoblotting. MTT and Transwell assays were used to detect the changes of cell proliferation and invasion after EZH2 downregulation. Of the 104 cases of endometrial carcinoma samples, 71 cases showed positive expression of EZH2, with an expression rate of 68.27%. In 104 cases of adjacent tissue samples, 25 cases showed positive expression of EZH2, with an expression rate of 24.03%. The expression of EZH2 in endometrial carcinoma tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent tissue (P<0.05). The expression of EZH2 in endometrial carcinoma tissue was not correlated with the menopausal status and age of patients (P>0.05), but was correlated with the histological grade, depth of tumor invasion, lymph node metastasis and TNM stage (P<0.05). The expression of E2H2 was significantly downregulated by si-E2H2 and the proliferation and invasion abilities of cells were significantly reduced after EZH2 downregulation (P<0.05). EZH2 is closely related to the development of endometrial carcinoma and can enhance the proliferative activity of endometrial carcinoma RL-952 cells and promote cell invasion.Entities:
Keywords: EZH2; endometrial carcinoma; invasion; proliferation
Year: 2017 PMID: 29344151 PMCID: PMC5754892 DOI: 10.3892/ol.2017.7171
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncol Lett ISSN: 1792-1074 Impact factor: 3.111
siRNA-EZH2 primer sequences.
| siRNA | Sense strand sequence (5′-3′) | Antisense strand sequence (3′-5′) |
|---|---|---|
| si-EZH2-1 | GCUCCUCUAACCAUGUUUATT | UAAACAUGGUUAGAGGAGCTT |
| si-EZH2-2 | GGAUCACCGAGAUGAUAAATT | UUUAUCAUCUCGGUGAUCCTT |
| si-EZH2-3 | GAGGGAAAGUGUAUGAUAATT | UUAUCAUACACUUUCCCUCTT |
Figure 1.EZH2 in cancer and adjacent tissues. Immunohistochemistry showed that the positive expression of EZH2 in cancer tissue was significantly higher than that in adjacent tissue (P<0.05). (A) Expression of EZH2 in adjacent tissue; (B) expression of EZH2 in cancer tissue (magnification, ×200).
Expression of EZH2 in endometrial cancer and adjacent tissues.
| EZH2 expresssion | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | No. of cases | − | + | Positive rate (%) |
| Endometrial cancer tissue | 104 | 33 | 71 | 68.27 |
| Adjacent tissue | 104 | 79 | 25 | 24.03 |
| χ2 | 17.861 | |||
| P-value | 0.017 | |||
Relationship between the positive expression of EZH2 and the clinical characteristics of patients.
| EZH2 positive expression | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pathological features | Total no. of cases | No. of cases (%) | χ2-value | P-value |
| Menopause | ||||
| Yes | 64 | 46 (71.88) | 0.142 | >0.05 |
| No | 40 | 26 (65.00) | ||
| Age (years) | ||||
| ≥50 | 80 | 56 (70.00) | 0.473 | >0.05 |
| <50 | 24 | 16 (66.67) | ||
| Histology grade | ||||
| I | 42 | 30 (71.43) | 13.287[ | <0.05 |
| II | 30 | 22 (73.33) | ||
| III | 32 | 19 (59.38) | ||
| Depth of infiltration | ||||
| Shallow | 38 | 24 (63.16) | 5.692[ | <0.05 |
| Deep | 66 | 47 (71.21) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | ||||
| No | 58 | 38 (65.52) | 8.472[ | <0.05 |
| Yes | 46 | 33 (71.74) | ||
| TNM stage | ||||
| I, II | 42 | 28 (66.67) | 6.489[ | <0.05 |
| III, IV | 62 | 45 (72.58) | ||
χ2 results indicate that the difference in EZH2 expression for the given variable was statistically significant.
Figure 2.Protein expression before and after interference of EZH2 gene. Western blot analysis showed that the expression of EZH2 protein was significantly inhibited (P<0.05). (A) The expression of EZH2 protein by western blot analysis. (B) Analysis for the ratio of optical density of EZH2 to GAPDH (compared with si-Ctr, *P<0.05).
Figure 3.Effect of the EZH2 gene interference on cell proliferative ability. The MTT results showed a significant decrease in cell proliferative ability after siRNA-EZH2-3 interference, compared with the control group and the negative control group (*P<0.05).
Figure 4.Effects of EZH2 gene interference on cell invasion ability. The Tranwell results showed that the average number of cells in the si-EZH2 group was significantly higher than that in the control group and the negative control group (P<0.05). (A) Morphology of cells through basement membrane after staining with crystal violet at ×400 magnification; (B) analysis of cell counting under a microscope.