Literature DB >> 28340220

Her2/neu Status Determination in Breast Cancer: A Single Institutional Experience Using a Dual-Testing Approach With Immunohistochemistry and Fluorescence In Situ Hybridization.

James P Solomon1, Marie Dell'Aquila1, Oluwole Fadare1, Farnaz Hasteh1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: According to current guidelines, either immunohistochemistry (IHC) or in situ hybridization (ISH) can be used to determine human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (Her2/neu) status in breast carcinoma. While the guidelines explicitly delineate result interpretation, there is no consensus on the most appropriate testing algorithm.
METHODS: The Her2/neu statuses of 369 consecutive cases of invasive breast cancer (from 351 patients) were assessed in a dual-testing algorithm that uses both IHC and fluorescence ISH (FISH). FISH was performed using dual-color HER2/ chromosome enumeration probe 17 ( CEP17 ) probes, and if equivocal results were obtained, reflex testing using HER2/lissencephaly gene 1 ( LIS1 ) probes was used. Results from both modalities were scored and reported using American Society of Clinical Oncology/College of American Pathologists 2013 criteria.
RESULTS: Sixty-one (16.5%) of the 369 tumors were found to be Her2/neu positive by at least one modality. The overall concordance between IHC and FISH results was 97.6%. Six of the 369 tumors were reclassified as Her2/neu positive after a negative IHC result. FISH was also able to identify significantly more Her2/neu-positive cases than IHC.
CONCLUSIONS: The commonly used reflex strategy based on IHC results may deny potentially beneficial targeted therapy for a small cohort of patients, which should be considered as testing guidelines are formulated and the cost-benefit analyses of various testing algorithms are assessed. © American Society for Clinical Pathology, 2017. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com

Entities:  

Keywords:  Ancillary testing; Breast carcinoma; ERBB2; Fluorescence in situ hybridization; Her2/neu

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28340220     DOI: 10.1093/ajcp/aqw224

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  9 in total

1.  Utility of Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Retesting of Histologic Grade 3 Invasive Breast Carcinomas.

Authors:  Rebecca Gologorsky; Elizabeth Cureton; Veronica Shim
Journal:  Perm J       Date:  2019

2.  HER2 testing in breast cancers: comparison of assays and interpretation using ASCO/CAP 2013 and 2018 guidelines.

Authors:  Lauren E McLemore; Constance T Albarracin; Stephen K Gruschkus; Roland L Bassett; Yun Wu; Sagar Dhamne; Isaiah Yim; Kevin Lin; Isabelle Bedrosian; Nour Sneige; Hui Chen
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2021-04-03       Impact factor: 4.872

3.  Impact of the Updated Guidelines on Human Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor 2 (HER2) Testing in Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Min Chong Kim; Su Hwan Kang; Jung Eun Choi; Young Kyung Bae
Journal:  J Breast Cancer       Date:  2020-09-29       Impact factor: 3.588

4.  Evaluation of the body mass index in breast cancer prognosis in a cohort of small-stature overweight patients: multi-center study in China.

Authors:  Xin Tan; Danju Huang; Fan Zhang; Yingzhu Zhao; Mingjian Tan; Hongwan Li; Hengyu Zhang; Ke Wang; Huimeng Li; Dequan Liu; Rong Guo; Shicong Tang
Journal:  Gland Surg       Date:  2021-01

5.  Immunohistochemistry and alternative FISH testing in breast cancer with HER2 equivocal amplification.

Authors:  Sally Agersborg; Christopher Mixon; Thanh Nguyen; Sramila Aithal; Sucha Sudarsanam; Forrest Blocker; Lawrence Weiss; Robert Gasparini; Shiping Jiang; Wayne Chen; Gregory Hess; Maher Albitar
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2018-03-22       Impact factor: 4.872

6.  Data mining of digitized health records in a resource-constrained setting reveals that timely immunophenotyping is associated with improved breast cancer outcomes.

Authors:  Arturo López-Pineda; Mario F Rodríguez-Moran; Cleto Álvarez-Aguilar; Sarah M Fuentes Valle; Román Acosta-Rosales; Ami S Bhatt; Shruti N Sheth; Carlos D Bustamante
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2018-09-27       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  A decision tree-based prediction model for fluorescence in situ hybridization HER2 gene status in HER2 immunohistochemistry-2+ breast cancers: a 2538-case multicenter study on consecutive surgical specimens.

Authors:  Libo Yang; Zhang Zhang; Jiayuan Li; Min Chen; Jieliang Yang; Jing Fu; Hong Bu; Shaoxian Tang; Yueping Liu; Huixiang Li; Xiaomei Li; Fangping Xu; Xiaodong Teng; Yinghong Yang; Yun Ma; Shuangping Guo; Jinfen Wang; Deyu Guo
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2018-06-06       Impact factor: 4.207

8.  Survival outcomes in elderly Taiwanese women according to breast cancer subtype and lymph node status: A single-center retrospective study.

Authors:  Kung-Hung Lin; Huan-Ming Hsu; Kuo-Feng Hsu; Chi-Hong Chu; Zhi-Jie Hong; Chun-Yu Fu; Yu-Ching Chou; Golshan Mehra; Ming-Shen Dai; Jyh-Cherng Yu; Guo-Shiou Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Clinical and prognostic profile of Her2neu positive (non-luminal) intrinsic breast cancer subtype: comparison with Her2neu positive luminal breast cancers.

Authors:  Atif Ali Hashmi; Raeesa Mahboob; Saadia Mehmood Khan; Muhammad Irfan; Mariam Nisar; Narisa Iftikhar; Maham Siddiqui; Naveen Faridi; Amir Khan; Muhammad Muzzammil Edhi
Journal:  BMC Res Notes       Date:  2018-08-13
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.