Jacqueline A Palmer1, HaoYuan Hsiao2, Tamara Wright3, Stuart A Binder-Macleod4. 1. Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Emory University, 1441 Clifton Rd NE, RG36A, Atlanta, GA 30322 (USA). 2. Department of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation Science, School of Medicine, University of Maryland, Baltimore, Maryland. 3. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, Delaware. 4. Department of Physical Therapy, University of Delaware, and Graduate Program in Biomechanics and Movement Science, University of Delaware, Delaware.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent research demonstrated that the symmetry of corticomotor drive with the paretic and nonparetic plantarflexor muscles was related to the biomechanical ankle moment strategy that people with chronic stroke used to achieve their greatest walking speeds. Rehabilitation strategies that promote corticomotor balance might improve poststroke walking mechanics and enhance functional ambulation. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to test the effectiveness of a single session of gait training using functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry and plantarflexion ankle moment symmetry and to determine whether changes in corticomotor symmetry were related to changes in ankle moment symmetry within the session. DESIGN: This was a repeated-measures crossover study. METHODS: On separate days, 20 people with chronic stroke completed a session of treadmill walking either with or without the use of FES of their ankle dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles. We calculated plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry using transcranial magnetic stimulation and plantarflexion ankle moment symmetry during walking between the paretic and the nonparetic limbs before and after each session. We compared changes and tested relationships between corticomotor symmetry and ankle moment symmetry following each session. RESULTS: Following the session with FES, there was an increase in plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry that was related to the observed increase in ankle moment symmetry. In contrast, following the session without FES, there were no changes in corticomotor symmetry or ankle moment symmetry. LIMITATIONS: No stratification was made on the basis of lesion size, location, or clinical severity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate, for the first time (to our knowledge), the ability of a single session of gait training with FES to induce positive corticomotor plasticity in people in the chronic stage of stroke recovery. They also provide insight into the neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying improvements in biomechanical walking function.
BACKGROUND: Recent research demonstrated that the symmetry of corticomotor drive with the paretic and nonparetic plantarflexor muscles was related to the biomechanical ankle moment strategy that people with chronic stroke used to achieve their greatest walking speeds. Rehabilitation strategies that promote corticomotor balance might improve poststroke walking mechanics and enhance functional ambulation. OBJECTIVE: The study objectives were to test the effectiveness of a single session of gait training using functional electrical stimulation (FES) to improve plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry and plantarflexion ankle moment symmetry and to determine whether changes in corticomotor symmetry were related to changes in ankle moment symmetry within the session. DESIGN: This was a repeated-measures crossover study. METHODS: On separate days, 20 people with chronic stroke completed a session of treadmill walking either with or without the use of FES of their ankle dorsi- and plantarflexor muscles. We calculated plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry using transcranial magnetic stimulation and plantarflexion ankle moment symmetry during walking between the paretic and the nonparetic limbs before and after each session. We compared changes and tested relationships between corticomotor symmetry and ankle moment symmetry following each session. RESULTS: Following the session with FES, there was an increase in plantarflexor corticomotor symmetry that was related to the observed increase in ankle moment symmetry. In contrast, following the session without FES, there were no changes in corticomotor symmetry or ankle moment symmetry. LIMITATIONS: No stratification was made on the basis of lesion size, location, or clinical severity. CONCLUSIONS: These findings demonstrate, for the first time (to our knowledge), the ability of a single session of gait training with FES to induce positive corticomotor plasticity in people in the chronic stage of stroke recovery. They also provide insight into the neurophysiologic mechanisms underlying improvements in biomechanical walking function.
Authors: Trisha M Kesar; Ramu Perumal; Darcy S Reisman; Angela Jancosko; Katherine S Rudolph; Jill S Higginson; Stuart A Binder-Macleod Journal: Stroke Date: 2009-10-15 Impact factor: 7.914
Authors: Stephen J Page; Stacy M Harnish; Martine Lamy; James C Eliassen; Jerzy P Szaflarski Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2010-02 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Cinzia Calautti; Marcello Naccarato; Peter S Jones; Nikhil Sharma; Diana D Day; Adrian T Carpenter; Edward T Bullmore; Elizabeth A Warburton; Jean-Claude Baron Journal: Neuroimage Date: 2006-10-10 Impact factor: 6.556
Authors: Charalambos C Charalambous; Jing Nong Liang; Steve A Kautz; Mark S George; Mark G Bowden Journal: J Vis Exp Date: 2019-02-19 Impact factor: 1.355
Authors: Jacqueline A Palmer; Trisha M Kesar; Steven L Wolf; Michael R Borich Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2021-09-27 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Nicole Zahradka; Khushboo Verma; Ahad Behboodi; Barry Bodt; Henry Wright; Samuel C K Lee Journal: Sensors (Basel) Date: 2020-09-15 Impact factor: 3.576