| Literature DB >> 28338616 |
Andrea Ragusa1, Carla Centonze2, Maria E Grasso3, Maria F Latronico4, Pier F Mastrangelo5, Federica Sparascio6, Francesco P Fanizzi7, Michele Maffia8.
Abstract
Nutraceutics is a growing research field in which researchers study and attempt to improve the biological properties of metabolites in food. Wine is one of the most consumed products in the world and contains a plethora of molecules biologically relevant to human health. In this article, several polyphenols with potential antioxidant activity were measured in wines from Apulia, in Southeast Italy. Hydroxytyrosol, gallic and syringic acids, luteolin, quercetin, and trans-resveratrol were identified and quantified by HPLC. The amount of the analyzed metabolites in wines were largely dependent on their color, with red ones being the richest compared to white and rose wines. Gallic acid was the most abundant polyphenol, followed by syringic acid and luteolin. Nevertheless, significant amounts of hydroxytyrosol, quercetin, and trans-resveratrol were also found. The average concentration of polyphenols found in these wines could have potential health-promoting effects, especially if consumed in moderate quantities on a regular basis.Entities:
Keywords: HPLC; antioxidants; hydroxytyrosol; polyphenols; trans-resveratrol; wine
Year: 2017 PMID: 28338616 PMCID: PMC5409312 DOI: 10.3390/foods6040024
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Foods ISSN: 2304-8158
Figure 1Map of Italy with a zoom on a southern Apulia region (Salento, in red). The black dots represent the sites of production of the wines.
Characteristics and content of phenols in wines organized by type of grape.
| Wine Color | Grape Type | Year 1 | Alcoholic Grade 2 | Gallic Acid | Syringic Acid | Hydroxytyrosol | Luteolin | Quercetin | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Content in mg/kg 2 | ||||||||||
| Red | Blend | 4 | 2010–2013 | 13.5 ± 0.4 | 23.7 ± 4.0 | 7.6 ± 4.2 | 2.9 ± 1.0 | 5.7 ± 3.2 | 5.8 ± 1.3 | 2.9 ± 0.3 |
| Negroamaro | 16 | 2007–2013 | 13.6 ± 0.7 | 26.8 ± 7.4 | 7.2 ± 3.4 | 3.4 ± 1.8 | 6.3 ± 3.4 | 5.5 ± 2.7 | 2.8 ± 0.7 | |
| Primitivo | 5 | 2011–2012 | 13.6 ± 0.2 | 24.9 ± 7.0 | 7.8 ± 4.5 | 2.5 ± 1.1 | 6.0 ± 3.2 | 4.8 ± 3.4 | 2.8 ± 0.9 | |
| Susumaniello | 2 | 2012 | 13.3 ± 0.4 | 28.0 ± 2.2 | 5.2 ± 3.3 | 2.7 ± 2.1 | 7.2 ± 2.4 | 5.0 ± 1.4 | 4.3 ± 1.5 | |
| White | Bianco d’Alessano | 1 | 2013 | 12.0 | 2.7 | 2.0 | 0.9 | 1.1 | ND 3 | 0.2 |
| Blend | 4 | 2012–2013 | 12.6 ± 1.5 | 4.5 ± 1.1 | 2.2 ± 0.6 | 1.3 ± 0.9 | 0.8 ± 0.5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |
| Chardonnay | 9 | 2012–2013 | 13.1 ± 0.8 | 5.5 ± 1.4 | 2.2 ± 1.7 | 2.3 ± 1.3 | 1.3 ± 0.7 | 1.2 ± 1.8 | 0.2 ± 0.1 | |
| Falanghina | 1 | 2013 | 12.5 | 5.3 | 2.3 | 0.8 | 0.7 | ND | 0.3 | |
| Fiano | 3 | 2013 | 13.0 ± 1.0 | 8.1 ± 4.1 | 1.8 ± 0.3 | 1.1 ± 0.3 | 0.6 ± 0.3 | 0.3 ± 0.6 | 0.1 ± 0.1 | |
| Malvasia | 1 | 2013 | 13.0 | 4.5 | 3.6 | 0.6 | 1.1 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
| Moscato | 1 | 2012 | 14.5 | 12.5 | 2.0 | 0.2 | 4.5 | 1.0 | 0.3 | |
| Negroamaro | 1 | 2013 | 12.5 | 3.0 | 2.8 | 0.6 | 0.6 | ND | 0.1 | |
| Verdecca | 1 | 2013 | 12.5 | 5.5 | 2.7 | 0.4 | 0.5 | ND | 0.5 | |
| Rose | Negroamaro | 18 | 2011–2013 | 12.9 ± 0.5 | 5.9 ± 2.1 | 2.7 ± 1.4 | 1.2 ± 0.8 | 2.3 ± 2.2 | 0.6 ± 0.8 | 0.6 ± 0.2 |
| Negroamaro and Malvasia Nera | 4 | 2013 | 12.9 ± 0.6 | 7.4 ± 3.7 | 2.5 ± 0.7 | 1.1 ± 0.4 | 2.4 ± 1.6 | 1.6 ± 1.8 | 0.8 ± 0.4 | |
| Primitivo | 1 | 2013 | 13.5 | 5.5 | 3.6 | 1.1 | 1.8 | ND | 0.6 | |
1 Production year and alcoholic grade as reported on the bottle. 2 Values are expressed as mean ± standard deviation relatively to the different wine bottles analyzed. In some cases only one bottle per grape type was available and no standard deviation was reported. 3 Not detected, below the limit of detection.
Figure 2Histogram of the analyzed phenols grouped for wine color.
Figure 3(a) Principal component analysis (PCA) scoreplot (PC1 vs. PC2) for red (blue circles), white (red squares), and rose (green diamonds) wines. Ellipses represent the density space of each group with a correlation coefficient of 0.95. (b) Loadings plot of PC1 vs. PC2.
Figure 4(a) GDA scoreplot; (b) Mahalanobis distances scatter plot for white (blue circles) and rose (red squares) wines.