| Literature DB >> 28338005 |
Mu Zeng1, Yingyan Qiao2, Zhaoying Wen3, Jun Liu1, Enhua Xiao1, Changlian Tan1, Yibin Xie4, Jing An5, Zishu Zhang1, Zhanming Fan3, Debiao Li4.
Abstract
The objective of this study was to assess the relationship between imaging surrogates for diffuse fibrosis and myocardial dysfunction. Thirty-six New Zealand white rabbits were classified into two groups: a control group (n = 18) and an alloxan-induced diabetes mellitus (DM) group (n = 18). For all rabbits, conventional ultrasonography, two-dimensional speckle tracking, and cardiac magnetic resonance (CMR) T1 mapping were performed; all of the rabbits were then sacrificed for Masson's staining. The extracellular volume (ECV) was calculated from pre- and post-contrast T1 values and compared with myocardial function measured by echocardiography using Pearson's correlation. In the DM group, ECV increased as the duration of diabetes increased, consistent with the changes in myocardial fibrosis verified by pathology. Moreover, ECV was strongly correlated with the early diastolic strain rate (r = -0.782, p < 0.001) and moderately correlated with the radial systolic peak strain (r = 0.478, p = 0.045). Thus, ECV is an effective surrogate for myocardial diffuse fibrosis on CMR imaging, and higher ECV values are associated with an increased impairment of myocardial diastolic function.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28338005 PMCID: PMC5364486 DOI: 10.1038/srep44937
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Sci Rep ISSN: 2045-2322 Impact factor: 4.379
Ultrasonography and CMR parameters.
| DM group | Control group | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 9 months | Baseline | 3 months | 6 months | 9 months | |
| LA (mm) | 9.56 ± 0.98 | 10.56 ± 0.58 | 9.97 ± 0.86 | 11.36 ± 0.82 | 9.95 ± 0.68 | 9.79 ± 0.81 | 10.61 ± 0.58 | 11.56 ± 0.67 |
| IVS (mm) | 2.32 ± 0.41 | 2.43 ± 0.32 | 2.42 ± 0.51 | 2.52 ± 0.62 | 2.63 ± 0.24 | 2.34 ± 0.32 | 2.75 ± 0.31 | 2.86 ± 0.63 |
| LVPW (mm) | 2.33 ± 0.51 | 2.56 ± 0.32 | 2.78 ± 0.67 | 2.89 ± 0.43 | 2.35 ± 0.19 | 2.67 ± 0.41 | 2.78 ± 0.53 | 2.89 ± 0.67 |
| LVIDd (mm) | 15.67 ± 0.59 | 16.67 ± 0.81 | 16.65 ± 0.78 | 17.67 ± 0.55 | 14.75 ± 0.87 | 15.68 ± 0.85 | 16.64 ± 0.54 | 16.98 ± 0.67 |
| LVIDs (mm) | 11.67 ± 1.21 | 12.87 ± 1.16 | 12.45 ± 1.13 | 12.67 ± 1.41 | 11.78 ± 1.32 | 11.97 ± 1.21 | 13.67 ± 1.29 | 12.67 ± 1.26 |
| EF (%) | 60.33 ± 4.51 | 61.33 ± 4.23 | 62.33 ± 3.57 | 62.67 ± 4.53 | 61.53 ± 4.23 | 63.33 ± 5.51 | 63.73 ± 4.35 | 62.37 ± 4.54 |
| FS (%) | 31.33 ± 3.16 | 32.33 ± 3.23 | 32.78 ± 3.45 | 34.33 ± 3.32 | 30.67 ± 3.15 | 31.54 ± 3.24 | 35.33 ± 4.51 | 34.33 ± 3.36 |
| SR | 18.63 ± 1.25 | 18.06 ± 1.50 | 18.83 ± 1.42 | 14.33 ± 1.60* | 18.46 ± 1.37 | 18.54 ± 1.60 | 18.71 ± 1.33 | 18.35 ± 1.14* |
| SrR | −8.24 ± 0.64 | −8.33 ± 0.53 | −6.60 ± 1.17* | −5.01 ± 1.11* | −8.19 ± 0.72 | −8.26 ± 0.42 | −8.11 ± 1.01* | −8.16 ± 0.60* |
| ECV | 29.96 ± 1.33 | 32.31 ± 1.54* | 35.82 ± 1.41* | 39.81 ± 1.63* | 30.01 ± 1.21 | 30.05 ± 1.59* | 29.83 ± 1.47* | 30.33 ± 1.75* |
*p < 0.05 vs. the control group at the same time point.
Figure 1Representative T1 maps for a typical rabbit in the 6-months diabetes group.
(A) Pre-contrast T1 map. ROI 1 shows the T1 pre-contrast myocardium time: 1,330 ± 86 ms, and ROI 2 shows the T1 pre-contrast blood time: 1,876 ± 27 ms. (B) Post-contrast T1 map from the same level. ROI 1 shows the T1 post-contrast myocardium time: 513 ± 16 ms, and ROI 2 shows the T1 post-contrast blood time: 408 ± 6 ms. Hematocrit: 42%. The ECV calculated from pre- and post-contrast T1 maps is 36.2%.
Figure 2Correlations between myocardial fibrosis on MR images and cardiac systolic and diastolic function on ultrasonography images in the DM group.
(A) Correlation between the ECV and SR; (B) Correlation between the ECV and SrR.
Figure 3Histological assessment of myocardial alterations in accordance with the MR ROI areas in the interventricular septum myocardium.
Masson’s staining (blue = fibrosis, red = myocardial cells) of the hearts of control and DM rabbits. Compared with the control group, the severity of diffuse interstitial fibrosis increased as the duration of diabetes increased in the DM group.
Figure 4A bar plot presenting the CVF in the DM and age-matched control groups.
CVF: collagen volume fraction; DM: diabetes mellitus.