Literature DB >> 28337537

Is prepulse modification altered by continuous theta burst stimulation? DAT1 genotype and motor threshold interact on prepulse modification following brain stimulation.

S Notzon1, N Vennewald2, A Gajewska3, A L Klahn4, J Diemer5, B Winter6, I Fohrbeck4, V Arolt4, P Pauli7, K Domschke3,8, P Zwanzger4,5,9.   

Abstract

Previous studies suggest an inhibitory top-down control of the amygdala by the prefrontal cortex (PFC). Both brain regions play a role in the modulation of prepulse modification (PPM) of the acoustic startle response by a pre-stimulus. Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) can modulate the activity of the PFC and might thus affect PPM. This study tested the effect of inhibitory rTMS on PPM accounting for a genetic variant of the dopamine transporter gene (DAT1). Healthy participants (N = 102) were stimulated with continuous theta burst stimulation (cTBS, an intense form of inhibitory rTMS) or sham treatment over the right PFC. Afterwards, during continuous presentation of a background white noise a louder noise burst was presented either alone (control startle) or preceded by a prepulse. Participants were genotyped for a DAT1 variable number tandem repeat (VNTR) polymorphism. Two succeeding sessions of cTBS over the right PFC (2 × 600 stimuli with a time lag of 15 min) attenuated averaged prepulse inhibition (PPI) in participants with a high resting motor threshold. An attenuation of PPI induced by prepulses with great distances to the pulse (480, 2000 ms) was observed following active cTBS in participants that were homozygous carriers of the 10-repeat-allele of the DAT1 genotype and had a high resting motor threshold. Our results confirm the importance of the prefrontal cortex for the modulation of PPM. The effects were observed in participants with a high resting motor threshold only, probably because they received a higher dose of cTBS. The effects in homozygous carriers of the DAT1 10-repeat allele confirm the relevance of dopamine for PPM. Conducting an exploratory study we decided against the use of a correction for multiple testing.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Acoustic startle response; DAT1 genotype; Prepulse facilitation; Prepulse inhibition; Prepulse modification; Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS); Theta burst stimulation (TBS)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28337537     DOI: 10.1007/s00406-017-0786-x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Psychiatry Clin Neurosci        ISSN: 0940-1334            Impact factor:   5.270


  69 in total

1.  Sham TMS: intracerebral measurement of the induced electrical field and the induction of motor-evoked potentials.

Authors:  S H Lisanby; D Gutman; B Luber; C Schroeder; H A Sackeim
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2001-03-01       Impact factor: 13.382

2.  Neocortical modulation of the amygdala response to fearful stimuli.

Authors:  Ahmad R Hariri; Venkata S Mattay; Alessandro Tessitore; Francesco Fera; Daniel R Weinberger
Journal:  Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2003-03-15       Impact factor: 13.382

3.  One session of repeated parietal theta burst stimulation trains induces long-lasting improvement of visual neglect.

Authors:  Thomas Nyffeler; Dario Cazzoli; Christian W Hess; René M Müri
Journal:  Stroke       Date:  2009-06-11       Impact factor: 7.914

Review 4.  Human studies of prepulse inhibition of startle: normal subjects, patient groups, and pharmacological studies.

Authors:  D L Braff; M A Geyer; N R Swerdlow
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 4.530

5.  Information-processing deficits and cognitive dysfunction in panic disorder.

Authors:  Stephan Ludewig; Mark A Geyer; Marcel Ramseier; Franz X Vollenweider; Evelyne Rechsteiner; Katja Cattapan-Ludewig
Journal:  J Psychiatry Neurosci       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 6.186

Review 6.  Realistic expectations of prepulse inhibition in translational models for schizophrenia research.

Authors:  Neal R Swerdlow; Martin Weber; Ying Qu; Gregory A Light; David L Braff
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-06-21       Impact factor: 4.530

7.  Variation in dopamine genes influences responsivity of the human reward system.

Authors:  Jean-Claude Dreher; Philip Kohn; Bhaskar Kolachana; Daniel R Weinberger; Karen Faith Berman
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2008-12-22       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Functional effects of dopamine transporter gene genotypes on in vivo dopamine transporter functioning: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S V Faraone; T J Spencer; B K Madras; Y Zhang-James; J Biederman
Journal:  Mol Psychiatry       Date:  2013-09-24       Impact factor: 15.992

9.  Neuronal activity of the prefrontal cortex is reduced in rats selectively bred for deficient sensorimotor gating.

Authors:  Mesbah Alam; Svilen Angelov; Meike Stemmler; Christof von Wrangel; Joachim K Krauss; Kerstin Schwabe
Journal:  Prog Neuropsychopharmacol Biol Psychiatry       Date:  2014-09-16       Impact factor: 5.067

Review 10.  Models and mechanisms of anxiety: evidence from startle studies.

Authors:  Christian Grillon
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2007-12-06       Impact factor: 4.530

View more
  1 in total

1.  Genetic Determinants of Gating Functions: Do We Get Closer to Understanding Schizophrenia Etiopathogenesis?

Authors:  Rastislav Rovný; Dominika Besterciová; Igor Riečanský
Journal:  Front Psychiatry       Date:  2020-11-25       Impact factor: 4.157

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.