| Literature DB >> 28337439 |
Xuezheng Zhang1, Mahmoud Attia Mohamed Kassem2, Ying Zhou3, Muhammad Shabsigh2, Quanguang Wang4, Xuzhong Xu4.
Abstract
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is one of the important risk factors contributing to postoperative airway complications. OSA alters the respiratory physiology and increases the sensitivity of muscle tone of the upper airway after surgery to residual anesthetic medication. In addition, the prevalence of OSA was reported to be much higher among surgical patients than the general population. Therefore, appropriate monitoring to detect early respiratory impairment in postoperative extubated patients with possible OSA is challenging. Based on the comprehensive clinical observation, several equipment have been used for monitoring the respiratory conditions of OSA patients after surgery, including the continuous pulse oximetry, capnography, photoplethysmography (PPG), and respiratory volume monitor (RVM). To date, there has been no consensus on the most suitable device as a recommended standard of care. In this review, we describe the advantages and disadvantages of some possible monitoring strategies under certain clinical conditions. According to the literature, the continuous pulse oximetry, with its high sensitivity, is still the most widely used device. It is also cost-effective and convenient to use but has low specificity and does not reflect ventilation. Capnography is the most widely used device for detection of hypoventilation, but it may not provide reliable data for extubated patients. Even normal capnography cannot exclude the existence of hypoxia. PPG shows the state of both ventilation and oxygenation, but its sensitivity needs further improvement. RVM provides real-time detection of hypoventilation, quantitative precise demonstration of respiratory rate, tidal volume, and MV for extubated patients, but no reflection of oxygenation. Altogether, the sole use of any of these devices is not ideal for monitoring of extubated patients with or at risk for OSA after surgery. However, we expect that the combined use of continuous pulse oximetry and RVM may be promising for these patients due to their complementary function, which need further study.Entities:
Keywords: capnography; monitoring; obstructive sleep apnea; oximetry; photoplethysmography; respiratory volume monitor; surgery
Year: 2017 PMID: 28337439 PMCID: PMC5340767 DOI: 10.3389/fmed.2017.00026
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Med (Lausanne) ISSN: 2296-858X
Features of different equipment.
| Equipment | Advantages | Disadvantages |
|---|---|---|
| Oximetry (Spacelab1600, USA) | Convenient, cost-effective, high sensitivity (95.6%) for desaturation | Low specificity (80.6%), lagging indication of respiratory abnormality, signal error; measures oxygenation, not ventilation; false alarm reduced signal quality in patients with poor peripheral perfusion |
| Capnography (Medtronic, USA) | Can be used in collaboration with SpO2 to reflect oxygenation and ventilation. High sensitivity (98%) and specificity (98%) for trachea intubated patients | EtCO2 can be influenced by hemodynamic disturbance, complexity in interpreting CO2 waveforms; maybe unable to detect hypoxemia; no report of sensitivity and specificity for extubated patients |
| PPG (Nonin Medical, USA) | Shows the condition of both ventilation and oxygenation with specificity of 91% | Low sensitivity (75%), multiple reasons such as motion, vasoconstrictor use, and heart rate change contribute to artifact of PPG |
| RVM (ExSpieon, USA) | Real-time detection of hypoventilation, quantitative precise demonstration of RR, TV, and MV for extubated patients, with sensitivity of 93% | May not work normally when the patients do not take supine position; with specificity of 86% |
SpO.