Literature DB >> 28336479

Radiosurgical target distance from the root entry zone in the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Justin Sharim1, Wei-Lun Lo2, Won Kim3, Srinivas Chivukula3, Stephen Tenn4, Tania Kaprealian4, Nader Pouratian5.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) provides a noninvasive treatment modality for patients with medically refractory trigeminal neuralgia. The root entry zone (REZ) has been proposed to be an ideal stereotactic target because it is partially composed of centrally produced myelin, conferring a theoretical increased sensitivity to irradiation as well as increased susceptibility to neurovascular conflict, making it the site in which nociceptive signals likely arise. The aim of this study is to determine if there is a statistically and clinically significant difference in pain relief or facial hypesthesia following SRS based on distance of the stereotactic isocenter from REZ. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Patients undergoing Novalis radiosurgery for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia with at least 3 months' follow-up were included in this study. Postoperative outcomes were stratified by Barrow Neurological Institute (BNI) score for pain relief and BNI facial numbness score for facial hypesthesia.
RESULTS: Sixty-seven patients met inclusion criteria and were included in this study. BNI score of I-IIIa was attained in 82% of patients at 3 months and 65% at 1 year following SRS. Distance from isocenter to REZ varied from 0 to 8.6 mm, with a mean of 1.94 ± 1.62 mm. Logistic regression of target-REZ distance against pain relief outcome (patients with score I-IIIa and IIIb-V) was insignificant at 3 months (P = .988), 6 months (P = .925), 9 months (P = .845), and 12 months (P = .547) postoperatively. Furthermore, no significant correlation was found with logistic regression of target-REZ distance with pain relief outcome (patients with score I and score II-IV) (P = .544).
CONCLUSIONS: The current analysis suggests that distance from REZ does not correlate with degree of postoperative pain relief or facial hypesthesia; thus, targeting specific regions within the trigeminal nerve in relation to these anatomical characteristics may not afford any advantage from this perspective.
Copyright © 2016 American Society for Radiation Oncology. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28336479      PMCID: PMC5552297          DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2016.12.006

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pract Radiat Oncol        ISSN: 1879-8500


  31 in total

Review 1.  Systematic review of ablative neurosurgical techniques for the treatment of trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Benjamin C Lopez; Peter J Hamlyn; Joanna M Zakrzewska
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 4.654

2.  Radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Nicolas Massager; José Lorenzoni; Daniel Devriendt; Marc Levivier
Journal:  Prog Neurol Surg       Date:  2007

3.  Detailed anatomy of the intracranial portion of the trigeminal nerve.

Authors:  K Gudmundsson; A L Rhoton; J G Rushton
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  1971-11       Impact factor: 5.115

4.  Gamma knife surgery for trigeminal neuralgia: outcomes and prognostic factors.

Authors:  Jason Sheehan; Hung-Chuan Pan; Matei Stroila; Ladislau Steiner
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 5.115

5.  Sterotaxic radiosurgery in trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  L Leksell
Journal:  Acta Chir Scand       Date:  1971

6.  Gamma knife radiosurgery for trigeminal neuralgia: the initial experience of The Barrow Neurological Institute.

Authors:  C L Rogers; A G Shetter; J A Fiedler; K A Smith; P P Han; B L Speiser
Journal:  Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys       Date:  2000-07-01       Impact factor: 7.038

Review 7.  Trigeminal neuralgia: pathology and pathogenesis.

Authors:  S Love; H B Coakham
Journal:  Brain       Date:  2001-12       Impact factor: 13.501

8.  Linear accelerator radiosurgery using 90 gray for essential trigeminal neuralgia: results and dose volume histogram analysis.

Authors:  Bryan W Goss; Leonardo Frighetto; Antonio A F DeSalles; Zachary Smith; Timothy Solberg; Michael Selch
Journal:  Neurosurgery       Date:  2003-10       Impact factor: 4.654

9.  Gamma knife surgery for idiopathic trigeminal neuralgia performed using a far-anterior cisternal target and a high dose of radiation.

Authors:  Nicolas Massager; José Lorenzoni; Daniel Devriendt; Françoise Desmedt; Jacques Brotchi; Marc Levivier
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 10.  Microvascular decompression for elderly patients with trigeminal neuralgia.

Authors:  Kevin Phan; Prashanth J Rao; Mark Dexter
Journal:  J Clin Neurosci       Date:  2016-03-02       Impact factor: 1.961

View more
  4 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of CyberKnife Radiosurgery for Recurrent Trigeminal Neuralgia.

Authors:  Aldo Berti; George Ibars; Xiaodong Wu; Alex Sabo; Michelle Granville; Gail Suarez; James G Schwade; Robert E Jacobson
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2018-05-09

2.  Targeting accuracy at couch kick for a frameless image guided radiosurgery system.

Authors:  Yimei Huang; Bo Zhao; Joshua Kim; Ning Wen; Indrin J Chetty; Salim Siddiqui
Journal:  J Radiosurg SBRT       Date:  2018

3.  Gamma Knife Radiosurgery for Trigeminal Neuralgia: A Comparison of Dose Protocols.

Authors:  Warren Boling; Minwoo Song; Wendy Shih; Bengt Karlsson
Journal:  Brain Sci       Date:  2019-06-10

Review 4.  Treatment Outcomes in Trigeminal Neuralgia-A Systematic Review of Domains, Dimensions and Measures.

Authors:  Carolina Venda Nova; Joanna M Zakrzewska; Sarah R Baker; Richeal Ni Riordain
Journal:  World Neurosurg X       Date:  2020-01-27
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.