Literature DB >> 28335891

The majority of patients with metastatic melanoma are not represented in pivotal phase III immunotherapy trials.

Marco Donia1, Marie Louise Kimper-Karl2, Katrine Lundby Høyer3, Lars Bastholt2, Henrik Schmidt3, Inge Marie Svane4.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Recent randomised phase III trials have led to the approval of several immune checkpoint inhibitors for unresectable or metastatic melanoma (MM). These trials all employed strict patient selection criteria, and it is currently unknown how large proportion of 'real-world' patients diagnosed with MM is not represented in these trials. PATIENTS AND METHODS: The Danish MM Database contains data on the entire, unselected population of MM within a nationwide geographical area. A total of 276 unselected cases of MM (ocular melanoma excluded), referred for first oncological evaluation in 2014, were included in the analysis. Seven pre-defined eligibility criteria, all used to select patients for enrolment in five recent randomised phase III immunotherapy trials, were analysed.
RESULTS: Fifty-five percent of the total population with MM did not meet one or more eligibility criteria ('not eligible' group) at first evaluation. PS ≥ 2 or active/untreated known brain metastases accounted alone for 74% of non-eligibility cases. Median overall survival in the 'not eligible' group was 5.43 months versus 18.3 months for the eligible (p < 0.0001, hazard ratio (HR) 2.44), reflected by significantly worse baseline prognostic features. However, patients treated with immunotherapy had similar survival outcomes regardless of eligibility.
CONCLUSION: Over half of the patients evaluated for systemic treatment of MM are not represented in phase III registration immunotherapy trials. The data reveal a huge knowledge gap regarding the usefulness of new immunotherapies in the 'real-world' patient population, and urge additional testing of known regimens in selected poor prognosis cohorts.
Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Immunotherapy; Metastatic melanoma; Patient selection; Phase III trials; Real-world patients

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28335891     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.12.017

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Cancer        ISSN: 0959-8049            Impact factor:   9.162


  22 in total

Review 1.  Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Melanoma: A Review of Pharmacokinetics and Exposure-Response Relationships.

Authors:  Cyril Leven; Maël Padelli; Jean-Luc Carré; Eric Bellissant; Laurent Misery
Journal:  Clin Pharmacokinet       Date:  2019-11       Impact factor: 6.447

Review 2.  Pseudoprogression of Melanoma Brain Metastases.

Authors:  Jillian L Simard; Melanie Smith; Sunandana Chandra
Journal:  Curr Oncol Rep       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 5.075

Review 3.  Immune checkpoint blockade in solid organ tumours: Choice, dose and predictors of response.

Authors:  Vishal Navani; Moira C Graves; Nikola A Bowden; Andre Van Der Westhuizen
Journal:  Br J Clin Pharmacol       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 4.335

4.  Efficacy and Safety of Immunotherapy-Based Combinations as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma in Patients Who Do Not Meet Trial Eligibility Criteria.

Authors:  Yuki Nemoto; Hiroki Ishihara; Kazutaka Nakamura; Hidekazu Tachibana; Hironori Fukuda; Kazuhiko Yoshida; Hirohito Kobayashi; Junpei Iizuka; Hiroaki Shimmura; Yasunobu Hashimoto; Kazunari Tanabe; Tsunenori Kondo; Toshio Takagi
Journal:  Target Oncol       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 4.864

5.  Effectiveness of pembrolizumab in trial-ineligible patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma.

Authors:  Wataru Fukuokaya; Takafumi Yanagisawa; Masaki Hashimoto; Shutaro Yamamoto; Yuhei Koike; Yu Imai; Kosuke Iwatani; Hajime Onuma; Kagenori Ito; Fumihiko Urabe; Shunsuke Tsuzuki; Shoji Kimura; Jun Miki; Yu Oyama; Hirokazu Abe; Takahiro Kimura
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Immunother       Date:  2022-09-14       Impact factor: 6.630

6.  Personalized Reimbursement Model (PRM) program: A real-world data platform of cancer drugs use to improve and personalize drug pricing and reimbursement in France.

Authors:  Pierre-Alexandre Squara; Vinh-Phuc Luu; David Pérol; Bruno Coudert; Valérie Machuron; Camille Bachot; Laurence Samelson; Virginie Florentin; Jean-Marc Pinguet; Béchir Ben Hadj Yahia
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2022-04-19       Impact factor: 3.752

Review 7.  Optimal treatment strategy for metastatic melanoma patients harboring BRAF-V600 mutations.

Authors:  Emilio Francesco Giunta; Vincenzo De Falco; Stefania Napolitano; Giuseppe Argenziano; Gabriella Brancaccio; Elvira Moscarella; Davide Ciardiello; Fortunato Ciardiello; Teresa Troiani
Journal:  Ther Adv Med Oncol       Date:  2020-06-19       Impact factor: 8.168

8.  Quantified Kinematics to Evaluate Patient Chemotherapy Risks in Clinic.

Authors:  Zaki Hasnain; Tanachat Nilanon; Ming Li; Aaron Mejia; Anand Kolatkar; Luciano Nocera; Cyrus Shahabi; Frankie A Cozzens Philips; Jerry S H Lee; Sean E Hanlon; Poorva Vaidya; Naoto T Ueno; Sriram Yennu; Paul K Newton; Peter Kuhn; Jorge Nieva
Journal:  JCO Clin Cancer Inform       Date:  2020-06

9.  Real-world analyses of therapy discontinuation of checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic melanoma patients.

Authors:  Marina Amaral de Ávila Machado; Cristiano Soares de Moura; Kelvin Chan; Jeffrey R Curtis; Marie Hudson; Michal Abrahamowicz; Rahima Jamal; Louise Pilote; Sasha Bernatsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-03       Impact factor: 4.379

10.  Prevalence and risk factors for multimorbidity in older US patients with late-stage melanoma.

Authors:  Pragya Rai; Chan Shen; Joanna Kolodney; Kimberly M Kelly; Virginia G Scott; Usha Sambamoorthi
Journal:  J Geriatr Oncol       Date:  2020-09-25       Impact factor: 3.599

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.