Literature DB >> 28334563

Quality Improvement Initiatives Lead to Reduction in Nulliparous Term Singleton Vertex Cesarean Delivery Rate.

Mary A Vadnais, Michele R Hacker, Neel T Shah, JoAnn Jordan, Anna M Modest, Molly Siegel, Toni H Golen.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The nulliparous term singleton vertex (NTSV) cesarean delivery rate has been recognized as a meaningful benchmark. Variation in the NTSV cesarean delivery rate among hospitals and providers suggests many hospitals may be able to safely improve their rates. The NTSV cesarean delivery rate at the authors' institution was higher than state and national averages. This study was conducted to determine the influence of a set of quality improvement interventions on the NTSV cesarean delivery rate.
METHODS: From 2008 through 2015, at a single tertiary care academic medical center, a multi-strategy approach that included provider education, provider feedback, and implementation of new policies was used to target evidence-based and inferred factors that influence the NTSV cesarean delivery rate. Data on mode of delivery, maternal outcomes, and neonatal outcomes were collected from birth certificates and administrative claims data. The Cochran-Armitage test and linear regression were used to calculate the p-trend for categorical and continuous variables, respectively.
RESULTS: More than 20,000 NTSV deliveries were analyzed, including more than 15,000 during the intervention period. The NTSV cesarean delivery rate declined from 35% to 21% over eight years. The total cesarean delivery rate declined as well. Increase in meconium aspiration syndrome and maternal transfusion were observed.
CONCLUSION: Quality improvement initiatives can decrease the NTSV cesarean delivery rate. Any increased incidence of fetal or maternal complications associated with decreased NTSV cesarean delivery rate should be considered in the context of the risks and benefits of vaginal delivery compared to cesarean delivery.
Copyright © 2016 The Joint Commission. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2016        PMID: 28334563      PMCID: PMC5928501          DOI: 10.1016/j.jcjq.2016.11.008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf        ISSN: 1553-7250


  34 in total

1.  The graphic analysis of labor.

Authors:  E FRIEDMAN
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  1954-12       Impact factor: 8.661

2.  Nulliparous term singleton vertex cesarean delivery rates: institutional and individual level predictors.

Authors:  Dean V Coonrod; David Drachman; Paula Hobson; Maria Manriquez
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2008-06       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Meconium aspiration syndrome remains a significant problem in the NICU: outcomes and treatment patterns in term neonates admitted for intensive care during a ten-year period.

Authors:  B S Singh; R H Clark; R J Powers; A R Spitzer
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2009-01-22       Impact factor: 2.521

4.  ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 106: Intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring: nomenclature, interpretation, and general management principles.

Authors: 
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-07       Impact factor: 7.661

5.  Changes in labor patterns over 50 years.

Authors:  S Katherine Laughon; D Ware Branch; Julie Beaver; Jun Zhang
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2012-03-10       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  The physician factor in cesarean birth rates.

Authors:  G L Goyert; S F Bottoms; M C Treadwell; P C Nehra
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  1989-03-16       Impact factor: 91.245

7.  The impact of delivery suite guidelines on intrapartum care in 'standard primigravida'.

Authors:  Zarko Alfirevic; Grace Edwards; Mary Jane Platt
Journal:  Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol       Date:  2004-07-15       Impact factor: 2.435

8.  Association between vaginal birth after cesarean delivery and primary cesarean delivery rates.

Authors:  Melissa G Rosenstein; Miriam Kuppermann; Steven E Gregorich; Erika K Cottrell; Aaron B Caughey; Yvonne W Cheng
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-11       Impact factor: 7.661

9.  Comparative analysis of international cesarean delivery rates using 10-group classification identifies significant variation in spontaneous labor.

Authors:  Donal J Brennan; Michael S Robson; Martina Murphy; Colm O'Herlihy
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Cesarean delivery in relation to birth weight and gestational glucose tolerance: pathophysiology or practice style? Toronto Trihospital Gestational Diabetes Investigators.

Authors:  C D Naylor; M Sermer; E Chen; K Sykora
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1996-04-17       Impact factor: 56.272

View more
  9 in total

1.  Preventing Cesarean Birth in Women with Obesity: Influence of Unit-Level Midwifery Presence on Use of Cesarean among Women in the Consortium on Safe Labor Data Set.

Authors:  Nicole S Carlson; Rachel Breman; Jeremy L Neal; Julia C Phillippi
Journal:  J Midwifery Womens Health       Date:  2019-08-28       Impact factor: 2.388

2.  WHEN LESS IS MORE: SHIFTING RISK MANAGEMENT IN AMERICAN CHILDBIRTH.

Authors:  Kellie Owens
Journal:  Adv Med Sociol       Date:  2019-11-22

3.  Language Preference and Risk of Primary Cesarean Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

Authors:  Kimberly M Schaefer; Anna M Modest; Michele R Hacker; Lucy Chie; Yamicia Connor; Toni Golen; Rose L Molina
Journal:  Matern Child Health J       Date:  2021-04-27

4.  Benchmarking cesarean delivery rates using machine learning-derived optimal classification trees.

Authors:  Alexis C Gimovsky; Daisy Zhuo; Jordan T Levine; Jack Dunn; Maxime Amarm; Alan M Peaceman
Journal:  Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-01-12       Impact factor: 3.734

Review 5.  Cesarean delivery in low- and middle-income countries: A review of quality of care metrics and targets for improvement.

Authors:  Adeline A Boatin; Joseph Ngonzi; Gabriel Ganyaglo; Magatte Mbaye; Blair J Wylie; Khady Diouf
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2021-01-27       Impact factor: 3.926

6.  Do quality improvement projects require IRB approval?

Authors:  Kanekal S Gautham; Stephen Pearlman
Journal:  J Perinatol       Date:  2021-03-23       Impact factor: 3.225

7.  Caesarean section in uninsured women in the USA: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Ilir Hoxha; Medina Braha; Lamprini Syrogiannouli; David C Goodman; Peter Jüni
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-03-03       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Effect of a two-stage intervention package on the cesarean section rate in Guangzhou, China: A before-and-after study.

Authors:  Xiaoyan Xia; Zehong Zhou; Songying Shen; Jinhua Lu; Lifang Zhang; Peiyuan Huang; Jia Yu; Li Yang; Ping Wang; Kin-Bong Hubert Lam; Bo Jacobsson; Ben Willem Mol; Huimin Xia; Xiu Qiu
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2019-07-08       Impact factor: 11.069

9.  Long-term effects of the nine-item list intervention on obstetric and neonatal outcomes in Robson group 1 - A time series study.

Authors:  Eric Hildebrand; Marie Nelson; Marie Blomberg
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2020-09-01       Impact factor: 3.636

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.