Literature DB >> 28334549

Limitations of Immunomagnetic Separation for Detection of the Top Seven Serogroups of Shiga Toxin-Producing Escherichia coli.

J Hallewell1, T Alexander1, T Reuter2, K Stanford2.   

Abstract

Shiga toxin-producing Escherichia coli (STEC) strains are foodborne pathogens that negatively impact human health and compromise food safety. Serogroup O157 is the most frequently isolated and studied STEC serogroup, but six others (O26, O45, O103, O111, O121, and O145) have also been identified as significant sources of human disease and collectively have been referred to as the "top six" pathogenic serogroups. Because detection methods for non-O157 serogroups are not yet refined, the objective of this study was to compare the effectiveness of immunomagnetic separation (IMS) for recovery of serogroup O157 isolates with that for each of the top six E. coli serogroups in pure and mixed cultures of STEC at 103 to 107 CFU/mL. After serogroup-specific IMS, DNA was extracted from cultured isolates to analyze the specificity of each IMS assay using conventional and quantitative PCR. In pure cultures, DNA copy number obtained after IMS was lower for O111 and O157 (P < 0.01) than for other serogroups. Based on quantitative PCR (qPCR) analyses, specificity was reduced for all IMS assays when STEC isolates were mixed at 7 log CFU/mL, although the O157 IMS assays recovered only O157 over a wider range of concentrations than did assays for non-O157 serogroups. At the lowest dilution tested, conventional PCR was specific for all serogroups except O121 and O145. For these two serogroups, no dilution tested recovered only O121 or O145 when evaluated with conventional PCR. Refinements to IMS assays, development of selective media, and determination of optimal enrichment times to reduce background microflora or competition among serogroups would be especially beneficial for recovery of O111, O121, and O145 serogroups to improve STEC detection and isolation.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Detection; Immunomagnetic separation; Non-O157 serogroups; Shiga toxin–producing Escherichia coli

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334549     DOI: 10.4315/0362-028X.JFP-16-427

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Food Prot        ISSN: 0362-028X            Impact factor:   2.077


  3 in total

1.  Prevalence and Epidemiology of Non-O157 Escherichia coli Serogroups O26, O103, O111, and O145 and Shiga Toxin Gene Carriage in Scottish Cattle, 2014-2015.

Authors:  Deborah V Hoyle; Marianne Keith; Helen Williamson; Kareen Macleod; Heather Mathie; Ian Handel; Carol Currie; Anne Holmes; Lesley Allison; Rebecca McLean; Rebecca Callaby; Thibaud Porphyre; Sue C Tongue; Madeleine K Henry; Judith Evans; George J Gunn; David L Gally; Nuno Silva; Margo E Chase-Topping
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2021-04-27       Impact factor: 4.792

2.  A sensitive method for the recovery of Escherichia coli serogroup O55 including Shiga toxin-producing variants for potential use in outbreaks.

Authors:  M Kirchner; E Sayers; S Cawthraw; N Duggett; R Gosling; C Jenkins; T J Dallman; D Mueller-Doblies; M F Anjum
Journal:  J Appl Microbiol       Date:  2019-07-07       Impact factor: 3.772

3.  Variability in Characterizing Escherichia coli from Cattle Feces: A Cautionary Tale.

Authors:  Kim Stanford; Tim Reuter; Jennyka Hallewell; Renata Tostes; Trevor W Alexander; Tim A McAllister
Journal:  Microorganisms       Date:  2018-07-21
  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.