Literature DB >> 28334277

In bone metastasis miR-34a-5p absence inversely correlates with Met expression, while Met oncogene is unaffected by miR-34a-5p in non-metastatic and metastatic breast carcinomas.

Paola Maroni1, Rossella Puglisi2, Gianfranco Mattia2, Alessandra Carè2, Emanuela Matteucci3, Paola Bendinelli3, Maria Alfonsina Desiderio3.   

Abstract

The highlight of the molecular basis and therapeutic targets of the bone-metastatic process requires the identification of biomarkers of metastasis colonization. Here, we studied miR-34a-5p expression, and Met-receptor expression and localization in bone metastases from ductal breast carcinomas, and in ductal carcinomas without history of metastasis (20 cases). miR-34a-5p was elevated in non-metastatic breast carcinoma, intermediate in the adjacent tissue and practically absent in bone metastases, opposite to pair-matched carcinoma. Met-receptor biomarker was highly expressed and inversely correlated with miR-34a-5p using the same set of bone-metastasis tissues. The miR-34a-5p silencing might depend on aberrant-epigenetic mechanisms of plastic-bone metastases, since in 1833 cells under methyltransferase blockade miR-34a-5p augmented. In fact, 1833 cells showed very low endogenous miR-34a-5p, in respect to parental MDA-MB231 breast carcinoma cells, and the restoration of miR-34a-5p with the mimic reduced Met and invasiveness. Notably, hepatocyte growth factor (HGF)-dependent Met stabilization was observed in bone-metastatic 1833 cells, consistent with Met co-distribution with the ligand HGF at plasma membrane and at nuclear levels in bone metastases. Met-protein level was higher in non-metastatic (low grade) than in metastatic (high grade) breast carcinomas, notwithstanding miR-34a-5p-elevated expression in both the specimens. Thus, mostly in non-metastatic carcinomas the elevated miR-34a-5p unaffected Met, important for invasive/mesenchymal phenotype, while possibly targeting some stemness biomarkers related to metastatic phenotype. In personalized therapies against bone metastasis, we suggest miR-34a-5p as a suitable target of epigenetic reprogramming leading to the accumulation of miR-34a-5p and the down-regulation of Met-tyrosine kinase, a key player of the bone-metastatic process.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334277     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgx027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  11 in total

1.  Circulating miR34a levels as a potential biomarker in the follow-up of Ewing sarcoma.

Authors:  Marika Sciandra; Alessandra De Feo; Alessandro Parra; Lorena Landuzzi; Pier-Luigi Lollini; Maria Cristina Manara; Gianfranco Mattia; Giada Pontecorvi; Cristina Baricordi; Clara Guerzoni; Alberto Bazzocchi; Alessandra Longhi; Katia Scotlandi
Journal:  J Cell Commun Signal       Date:  2020-06-05       Impact factor: 5.782

2.  Clinical significance of miR-34a expression in thyroid diseases - an 18F-FDG PET-CT study.

Authors:  Long Chen; Conghui Yang; Jun Feng; Xin Liu; Yadong Tian; Lei Zhao; Ran Xie; Chao Liu; Sheng Zhao; Hua Sun
Journal:  Cancer Manag Res       Date:  2017-12-15       Impact factor: 3.989

Review 3.  MicroRNA-34a: A Versatile Regulator of Myriads of Targets in Different Cancers.

Authors:  Ammad Ahmad Farooqi; Sobia Tabassum; Aamir Ahmad
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2017-10-02       Impact factor: 5.923

4.  MicroRNA‑34a inhibits liver cancer cell growth by reprogramming glucose metabolism.

Authors:  Hai-Feng Zhang; Yi-Cheng Wang; Yi-Di Han
Journal:  Mol Med Rep       Date:  2018-01-09       Impact factor: 2.952

5.  The therapeutic effect of miR-125b is enhanced by the prostaglandin endoperoxide synthase 2/cyclooxygenase 2 blockade and hampers ETS1 in the context of the microenvironment of bone metastasis.

Authors:  Paola Maroni; Paola Bendinelli; Emanuela Matteucci; Maria Alfonsina Desiderio
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2018-05-01       Impact factor: 8.469

6.  MALAT1 regulates miR-34a expression in melanoma cells.

Authors:  Fei Li; Xinji Li; Li Qiao; Wen Liu; Chengshan Xu; Xiaogang Wang
Journal:  Cell Death Dis       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 8.469

7.  Mammary Tumor Cells with High Metastatic Potential Are Hypersensitive to Macrophage-Derived HGF.

Authors:  Takanori Kitamura; Yu Kato; Demi Brownlie; Daniel Y H Soong; Gaël Sugano; Nicolle Kippen; Jiufeng Li; Dahlia Doughty-Shenton; Neil Carragher; Jeffrey W Pollard
Journal:  Cancer Immunol Res       Date:  2019-10-15       Impact factor: 11.151

8.  Microenvironment Stimuli HGF and Hypoxia Differently Affected miR-125b and Ets-1 Function with Opposite Effects on the Invasiveness of Bone Metastatic Cells: A Comparison with Breast Carcinoma Cells.

Authors:  Emanuela Matteucci; Paola Maroni; Francesco Nicassio; Francesco Ghini; Paola Bendinelli; Maria Alfonsina Desiderio
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-01-16       Impact factor: 5.923

9.  miR-34a regulates adipogenesis in porcine intramuscular adipocytes by targeting ACSL4.

Authors:  Wenwen Wang; Xiuxiu Li; Ning Ding; Jun Teng; Shen Zhang; Qin Zhang; Hui Tang
Journal:  BMC Genet       Date:  2020-03-14       Impact factor: 2.797

Review 10.  Mediterranean Diet Food Components as Possible Adjuvant Therapies to Counteract Breast and Prostate Cancer Progression to Bone Metastasis.

Authors:  Paola Maroni; Paola Bendinelli; Alessandro Fulgenzi; Anita Ferraretto
Journal:  Biomolecules       Date:  2021-09-09
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.