Literature DB >> 28334176

Phylogenomic Systematics of Ostariophysan Fishes: Ultraconserved Elements Support the Surprising Non-Monophyly of Characiformes.

Prosanta Chakrabarty1, Brant C Faircloth1, Fernando Alda1, William B Ludt1, Caleb D Mcmahan1,2, Thomas J Near3, Alex Dornburg4, James S Albert5, Jairo Arroyave6, Melanie L J Stiassny7, Laurie Sorenson1,8, Michael E Alfaro8.   

Abstract

Ostariophysi is a superorder of bony fishes including more than 10,300 species in 1100 genera and 70 families. This superorder is traditionally divided into five major groups (orders): Gonorynchiformes (milkfishes and sandfishes), Cypriniformes (carps and minnows), Characiformes (tetras and their allies), Siluriformes (catfishes), and Gymnotiformes (electric knifefishes). Unambiguous resolution of the relationships among these lineages remains elusive, with previous molecular and morphological analyses failing to produce a consensus phylogeny. In this study, we use over 350 ultraconserved element (UCEs) loci comprising 5 million base pairs collected across 35 representative ostariophysan species to compile one of the most data-rich phylogenies of fishes to date. We use these data to infer higher level (interordinal) relationships among ostariophysan fishes, focusing on the monophyly of the Characiformes-one of the most contentiously debated groups in fish systematics. As with most previous molecular studies, we recover a non-monophyletic Characiformes with the two monophyletic suborders, Citharinoidei and Characoidei, more closely related to other ostariophysan clades than to each other. We also explore incongruence between results from different UCE data sets, issues of orthology, and the use of morphological characters in combination with our molecular data. [Conserved sequence; ichthyology; massively parallel sequencing; morphology; next-generation sequencing; UCEs.].
© The Author(s) 2017. Published by Oxford University Press, on behalf of the Society of Systematic Biologists. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334176     DOI: 10.1093/sysbio/syx038

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Syst Biol        ISSN: 1063-5157            Impact factor:   15.683


  13 in total

1.  Resolving the ray-finned fish tree of life.

Authors:  Michael E Alfaro
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-30       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole-genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning.

Authors:  Daniel Escobar-Camacho; Karen L Carleton; Devika W Narain; Michele E R Pierotti
Journal:  Mol Ecol       Date:  2020-06-08       Impact factor: 6.185

3.  Comprehensive phylogeny of ray-finned fishes (Actinopterygii) based on transcriptomic and genomic data.

Authors:  Lily C Hughes; Guillermo Ortí; Yu Huang; Ying Sun; Carole C Baldwin; Andrew W Thompson; Dahiana Arcila; Ricardo Betancur-R; Chenhong Li; Leandro Becker; Nicolás Bellora; Xiaomeng Zhao; Xiaofeng Li; Min Wang; Chao Fang; Bing Xie; Zhuocheng Zhou; Hai Huang; Songlin Chen; Byrappa Venkatesh; Qiong Shi
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2018-05-14       Impact factor: 11.205

4.  Accelerated Diversification Explains the Exceptional Species Richness of Tropical Characoid Fishes.

Authors:  Bruno F Melo; Brian L Sidlauskas; Thomas J Near; Fabio F Roxo; Ava Ghezelayagh; Luz E Ochoa; Melanie L J Stiassny; Jairo Arroyave; Jonathan Chang; Brant C Faircloth; Daniel J MacGuigan; Richard C Harrington; Ricardo C Benine; Michael D Burns; Kendra Hoekzema; Natalia C Sanches; Javier A Maldonado-Ocampo; Ricardo M C Castro; Fausto Foresti; Michael E Alfaro; Claudio Oliveira
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-12-16       Impact factor: 9.160

5.  Phylogenetic classification of bony fishes.

Authors:  Ricardo Betancur-R; Edward O Wiley; Gloria Arratia; Arturo Acero; Nicolas Bailly; Masaki Miya; Guillaume Lecointre; Guillermo Ortí
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2017-07-06       Impact factor: 3.260

6.  The Most Developmentally Truncated Fishes Show Extensive Hox Gene Loss and Miniaturized Genomes.

Authors:  Martin Malmstrøm; Ralf Britz; Michael Matschiner; Ole K Tørresen; Renny Kurnia Hadiaty; Norsham Yaakob; Heok Hui Tan; Kjetill Sigurd Jakobsen; Walter Salzburger; Lukas Rüber
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2018-04-01       Impact factor: 3.416

7.  Uneven Missing Data Skew Phylogenomic Relationships within the Lories and Lorikeets.

Authors:  Brian Tilston Smith; William M Mauck; Brett W Benz; Michael J Andersen
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 3.416

8.  A Cautionary Note on the Use of Genotype Callers in Phylogenomics.

Authors:  Pablo Duchen; Nicolas Salamin
Journal:  Syst Biol       Date:  2021-06-16       Impact factor: 15.683

9.  A Long-Term Conserved Satellite DNA That Remains Unexpanded in Several Genomes of Characiformes Fish Is Actively Transcribed.

Authors:  Rodrigo Zeni Dos Santos; Rodrigo Milan Calegari; Duílio Mazzoni Zerbinato de Andrade Silva; Francisco J Ruiz-Ruano; Silvana Melo; Claudio Oliveira; Fausto Foresti; Marcela Uliano-Silva; Fábio Porto-Foresti; Ricardo Utsunomia
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-02-03       Impact factor: 3.416

10.  A phylogenomic approach to reconstruct interrelationships of main clupeocephalan lineages with a critical discussion of morphological apomorphies.

Authors:  Nicolas Straube; Chenhong Li; Matthias Mertzen; Hao Yuan; Timo Moritz
Journal:  BMC Evol Biol       Date:  2018-10-23       Impact factor: 3.260

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.