Literature DB >> 32421918

Visual pigment evolution in Characiformes: The dynamic interplay of teleost whole-genome duplication, surviving opsins and spectral tuning.

Daniel Escobar-Camacho1, Karen L Carleton1, Devika W Narain2, Michele E R Pierotti3.   

Abstract

Vision represents an excellent model for studying adaptation, given the genotype-to-phenotype map that has been characterized in a number of taxa. Fish possess a diverse range of visual sensitivities and adaptations to underwater light, making them an excellent group to study visual system evolution. In particular, some speciose but understudied lineages can provide a unique opportunity to better understand aspects of visual system evolution such as opsin gene duplication and neofunctionalization. In this study, we showcase the visual system evolution of neotropical Characiformes and the spectral tuning mechanisms they exhibit to modulate their visual sensitivities. Such mechanisms include gene duplications and losses, gene conversion, opsin amino acid sequence and expression variation, and A1 /A2 -chromophore shifts. The Characiforms we studied utilize three cone opsin classes (SWS2, RH2, LWS) and a rod opsin (RH1). However, the characiform's entire opsin gene repertoire is a product of dynamic evolution by opsin gene loss (SWS1, RH2) and duplication (LWS, RH1). The LWS- and RH1-duplicates originated from a teleost specific whole-genome duplication as well as characiform-specific duplication events. Both LWS-opsins exhibit gene conversion and, through substitutions in key tuning sites, one of the LWS-paralogues has acquired spectral sensitivity to green light. These sequence changes suggest reversion and parallel evolution of key tuning sites. Furthermore, characiforms' colour vision is based on the expression of both LWS-paralogues and SWS2. Finally, we found interspecific and intraspecific variation in A1 /A2 -chromophores proportions, correlating with the light environment. These multiple mechanisms may be a result of the diverse visual environments where Characiformes have evolved.
© 2020 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Characiformes; chromophore; genome duplication; opsin; spectral tuning; visual pigment

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2020        PMID: 32421918      PMCID: PMC7451407          DOI: 10.1111/mec.15474

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mol Ecol        ISSN: 0962-1083            Impact factor:   6.185


  113 in total

1.  GARD: a genetic algorithm for recombination detection.

Authors:  Sergei L Kosakovsky Pond; David Posada; Michael B Gravenor; Christopher H Woelk; Simon D W Frost
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2006-11-16       Impact factor: 6.937

2.  PartitionFinder 2: New Methods for Selecting Partitioned Models of Evolution for Molecular and Morphological Phylogenetic Analyses.

Authors:  Robert Lanfear; Paul B Frandsen; April M Wright; Tereza Senfeld; Brett Calcott
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-03-01       Impact factor: 16.240

3.  Rapid and Parallel Adaptive Evolution of the Visual System of Neotropical Midas Cichlid Fishes.

Authors:  Julián Torres-Dowdall; Michele E R Pierotti; Andreas Härer; Nidal Karagic; Joost M Woltering; Frederico Henning; Kathryn R Elmer; Axel Meyer
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  2017-10-01       Impact factor: 16.240

4.  Visual pigments in teleost fishes: effects of habitat, microhabitat, and behavior on visual system evolution.

Authors:  J S Levine; E F MacNichol
Journal:  Sens Processes       Date:  1979-06

5.  A codon-based model of nucleotide substitution for protein-coding DNA sequences.

Authors:  N Goldman; Z Yang
Journal:  Mol Biol Evol       Date:  1994-09       Impact factor: 16.240

6.  Opsin gene duplication and divergence in ray-finned fish.

Authors:  Diana J Rennison; Gregory L Owens; John S Taylor
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2011-12-08       Impact factor: 4.286

7.  The eyes have it: regulatory and structural changes both underlie cichlid visual pigment diversity.

Authors:  Christopher M Hofmann; Kelly E O'Quin; N Justin Marshall; Thomas W Cronin; Ole Seehausen; Karen L Carleton
Journal:  PLoS Biol       Date:  2009-12-22       Impact factor: 8.029

8.  Genetics, lighting environment, and heritable responses to lighting environment affect male color morph expression in bluefin killifish, Lucania goodei.

Authors:  Rebecca C Fuller; Joseph Travis
Journal:  Evolution       Date:  2004-05       Impact factor: 3.694

9.  Visual adaptations to different light environments in Amazonian fishes.

Authors:  W R Muntz
Journal:  Rev Can Biol Exp       Date:  1982-03

10.  The molecular basis for spectral tuning of rod visual pigments in deep-sea fish.

Authors:  D M Hunt; K S Dulai; J C Partridge; P Cottrill; J K Bowmaker
Journal:  J Exp Biol       Date:  2001-10       Impact factor: 3.312

View more
  2 in total

1.  An atlas of fish genome evolution reveals delayed rediploidization following the teleost whole-genome duplication.

Authors:  Elise Parey; Alexandra Louis; Jérôme Montfort; Yann Guiguen; Hugues Roest Crollius; Camille Berthelot
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2022-08-12       Impact factor: 9.438

2.  Molecular Evolution of Ultraviolet Visual Opsins and Spectral Tuning of Photoreceptors in Anemonefishes (Amphiprioninae).

Authors:  Laurie J Mitchell; Karen L Cheney; Martin Lührmann; Justin Marshall; Kyle Michie; Fabio Cortesi
Journal:  Genome Biol Evol       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 3.416

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.