Literature DB >> 28334174

DNA-damage response in hematopoietic stem cells: an evolutionary trade-off between blood regeneration and leukemia suppression.

Shahar Biechonski1, Muhammad Yassin1, Michael Milyavsky1.   

Abstract

Self-renewing and multipotent hematopoietic stem cells (HSCs) maintain lifelong hematopoiesis. Their enormous regenerative potential coupled with lifetime persistence in the body, in contrast with the Progenitors, demand tight control of HSCs genome stability. Indeed, failure to accurately repair DNA damage in HSCs is associated with bone marrow failure and accelerated leukemogenesis. Recent observations exposed remarkable differences in several DNA-damage response (DDR) aspects between HSCs and Progenitors, especially in their DNA-repair capacities and susceptibility to apoptosis. Human HSCs in comparison with Progenitors exhibit delayed DNA double-strand break rejoining, persistent DDR signaling activation, higher sensitivity to the cytotoxic effects of ionizing radiation and attenuated expression of DNA-repair genes. Importantly, the distinct DDR of HSCs was also documented in mouse models. Nevertheless, physiological significance and the molecular basis of the HSCs-specific DDR features are only partially understood. Taking radiation-induced DDR as a paradigm, this review will focus on the current advances in understanding the role of cell-intrinsic DDR regulators and the cellular microenvironment in balancing stemness with genome stability. Pre-leukemia HSCs and clonal hematopoiesis evolvement will be discussed as an evolutionary compromise between the need for lifelong blood regeneration and DDR. Uniquely for this review, we outline the differences in HSCs-related DDR as highlighted by various experimental systems and attempt to provide their critical analysis.
© The Author 2017. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For Permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28334174     DOI: 10.1093/carcin/bgx002

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Carcinogenesis        ISSN: 0143-3334            Impact factor:   4.944


  11 in total

1.  Spironolactone inhibits the growth of cancer stem cells by impairing DNA damage response.

Authors:  Ayala Gold; Lital Eini; Malka Nissim-Rafinia; Ruth Viner; Shlomit Ezer; Keren Erez; Nasma Aqaqe; Rotem Hanania; Michael Milyavsky; Eran Meshorer; Michal Goldberg
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2019-01-08       Impact factor: 9.867

2.  Genomic and functional integrity of the hematopoietic system requires tolerance of oxidative DNA lesions.

Authors:  Ana Martín-Pardillos; Anastasia Tsaalbi-Shtylik; Si Chen; Seka Lazare; Ronald P van Os; Albertina Dethmers-Ausema; Nima Borhan Fakouri; Matthias Bosshard; Rossana Aprigliano; Barbara van Loon; Daniela C F Salvatori; Keiji Hashimoto; Celia Dingemanse-van der Spek; Masaaki Moriya; Lene Juel Rasmussen; Gerald de Haan; Marc H G P Raaijmakers; Niels de Wind
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2017-08-21       Impact factor: 22.113

3.  MLL-AF9 leukemias are sensitive to PARP1 inhibitors combined with cytotoxic drugs.

Authors:  Silvia Maifrede; Esteban Martinez; Margaret Nieborowska-Skorska; Daniela Di Marcantonio; Michael Hulse; Bac Viet Le; Huaqing Zhao; Katarzyna Piwocka; Italo Tempera; Stephen M Sykes; Tomasz Skorski
Journal:  Blood Adv       Date:  2017-08-09

4.  Loss of DEK induces radioresistance of murine restricted hematopoietic progenitors.

Authors:  Juana Serrano-Lopez; Kalpana Nattamai; Nicholas A Pease; Miranda S Shephard; Ashley M Wellendorf; Mathieu Sertorio; Eric A Smith; Hartmut Geiger; Susanne I Wells; Jose A Cancelas; Lisa M Privette Vinnedge
Journal:  Exp Hematol       Date:  2017-12-27       Impact factor: 3.084

5.  Use of MSCs and MSC-educated macrophages to mitigate hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome.

Authors:  Raghavan Chinnadurai; Matthew H Forsberg; John A Kink; Peiman Hematti; Christian M Capitini
Journal:  Curr Stem Cell Rep       Date:  2020-08-08

6.  Epidermal growth factor receptor-dependent DNA repair promotes murine and human hematopoietic regeneration.

Authors:  Tiancheng Fang; Yurun Zhang; Vivian Y Chang; Martina Roos; Christina M Termini; Lia Signaevskaia; Mamle Quarmyne; Paulina K Lin; Amara Pang; Jenny Kan; Xiao Yan; Anna Javier; Katherine Pohl; Liman Zhao; Peter Scott; Heather A Himburg; John P Chute
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2020-07-23       Impact factor: 22.113

7.  Attenuated DNA damage responses and increased apoptosis characterize human hematopoietic stem cells exposed to irradiation.

Authors:  Shahar Biechonski; Leonid Olender; Adi Zipin-Roitman; Muhammad Yassin; Nasma Aqaqe; Victoria Marcu-Malina; Melanie Rall-Scharpf; Magan Trottier; M Stephen Meyn; Lisa Wiesmüller; Katia Beider; Yael Raz; Dan Grisaru; Arnon Nagler; Michael Milyavsky
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  RAD52 aptamer regulates DNA damage repair and STAT3 in BRCA1/BRCA2‑deficient human acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Yichuan Xu; Yansi Lin; Yuxuan Luo; Yanling Yang; Bing Long; Zhigang Fang; Lingling Liu; Jingwen Zhang; Xiangzhong Zhang
Journal:  Oncol Rep       Date:  2020-08-10       Impact factor: 3.906

9.  USP15 Deubiquitinase Safeguards Hematopoiesis and Genome Integrity in Hematopoietic Stem Cells and Leukemia Cells.

Authors:  Paul van den Berk; Cesare Lancini; Carlos Company; Michela Serresi; Maria Pilar Sanchez-Bailon; Danielle Hulsman; Colin Pritchard; Ji-Ying Song; Matthias Jürgen Schmitt; Ellen Tanger; Oliver Popp; Philipp Mertins; Ivo J Huijbers; Heinz Jacobs; Maarten van Lohuizen; Gaetano Gargiulo; Elisabetta Citterio
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2020-12-29       Impact factor: 9.423

10.  Functional buffering via cell-specific gene expression promotes tissue homeostasis and cancer robustness.

Authors:  Hao-Kuen Lin; Jen-Hao Cheng; Chia-Chou Wu; Feng-Shu Hsieh; Carolyn Dunlap; Sheng-Hong Chen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2022-02-22       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.