Raghavan Chinnadurai1, Matthew H Forsberg2, John A Kink3,4, Peiman Hematti3,4, Christian M Capitini2,4. 1. Department of Biomedical Sciences, Mercer University School of Medicine, Savannah, GA. 2. Department of Pediatrics, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 3. Department of Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI. 4. Carbone Cancer Center, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, WI.
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Innovative and minimally toxic treatment approaches are sorely needed for the prevention and treatment of hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS). Cell therapies have been increasingly studied for their potential use as countermeasures for accidental and intentional ionizing radiation exposures which can lead to fatal ARS. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a cell therapy that have shown promising results in preclinical studies of ARS, and are being developed in clinical trials specifically for H-ARS. MSCs, MSC-educated macrophages (MEMs) and MSC-exosome educated macrophages (EEMs) all have the potential to be used as adoptive cell therapies for H-ARS. Here we review how MSCs have been reported to mitigate inflammation from radiation injury while also stimulating hematopoiesis during ARS. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss emerging work with immune cell subsets educated by MSCs, including MEMs and EEMs, in promoting hematopoiesis in xenogeneic models of ARS. We also discuss the first placental-derived MSC product to enter phase I trials, PLX-R18, and the challenges faced by bringing MSC and other cell therapies into the clinic for treating ARS. SUMMARY: Although MSCs, MEMs and EEMs are potential cell therapy candidates in promoting hematopoietic HRS, challenges persist in translational clinical development of these products to the clinic. Whether any of these cellular therapies will be sufficient as stand-alone therapies to mitigate H-ARS or if they will be a bridging therapy that insures survival until a curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant can be performed are the key questions that will have to be answered.
PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Innovative and minimally toxic treatment approaches are sorely needed for the prevention and treatment of hematopoietic acute radiation syndrome (H-ARS). Cell therapies have been increasingly studied for their potential use as countermeasures for accidental and intentional ionizing radiation exposures which can lead to fatal ARS. Mesenchymal stem/stromal cells (MSCs) are a cell therapy that have shown promising results in preclinical studies of ARS, and are being developed in clinical trials specifically for H-ARS. MSCs, MSC-educated macrophages (MEMs) and MSC-exosome educated macrophages (EEMs) all have the potential to be used as adoptive cell therapies for H-ARS. Here we review how MSCs have been reported to mitigate inflammation from radiation injury while also stimulating hematopoiesis during ARS. RECENT FINDINGS: We discuss emerging work with immune cell subsets educated by MSCs, including MEMs and EEMs, in promoting hematopoiesis in xenogeneic models of ARS. We also discuss the first placental-derived MSC product to enter phase I trials, PLX-R18, and the challenges faced by bringing MSC and other cell therapies into the clinic for treating ARS. SUMMARY: Although MSCs, MEMs and EEMs are potential cell therapy candidates in promoting hematopoietic HRS, challenges persist in translational clinical development of these products to the clinic. Whether any of these cellular therapies will be sufficient as stand-alone therapies to mitigate H-ARS or if they will be a bridging therapy that insures survival until a curative allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplant can be performed are the key questions that will have to be answered.
Authors: R Tamarat; M Benderitter; J R Jourdain; B W Maidment; F Macchiarini; C I Rios; A L DiCarlo Journal: Radiat Res Date: 2018-02-06 Impact factor: 2.841
Authors: Valentina L Rybkina; Maria V Bannikova; Galina V Adamova; Harald Dörr; Harry Scherthan; Tamara V Azizova Journal: Health Phys Date: 2018-07 Impact factor: 1.316
Authors: Michael Mendicino; Alexander M Bailey; Keith Wonnacott; Raj K Puri; Steven R Bauer Journal: Cell Stem Cell Date: 2014-02-06 Impact factor: 24.633
Authors: Raghavan Chinnadurai; Ian B Copland; Marco A Garcia; Christopher T Petersen; Christopher N Lewis; Edmund K Waller; Allan D Kirk; Jacques Galipeau Journal: Stem Cells Date: 2016-07-04 Impact factor: 6.277
Authors: Matthew H Forsberg; John A Kink; Anna S Thickens; Bryson M Lewis; Charlie J Childs; Peiman Hematti; Christian M Capitini Journal: Stem Cell Res Ther Date: 2021-08-18 Impact factor: 6.832
Authors: Raghavan Chinnadurai; Paul D Bates; Keith A Kunugi; Kwangok P Nickel; Larry A DeWerd; Christian M Capitini; Jacques Galipeau; Randall J Kimple Journal: Front Immunol Date: 2021-07-26 Impact factor: 7.561