| Literature DB >> 28334007 |
Konstantinos Voskarides1, Charalambos Stefanou1, Myrtani Pieri1, Panayiota Demosthenous1, Kyriakos Felekkis1, Maria Arsali2, Yiannis Athanasiou3, Dimitris Xydakis4, Kostas Stylianou4, Eugenios Daphnis4, Giorgos Goulielmos5, Petros Loizou6, Judith Savige7, Martin Höhne8,9, Linus A Völker8, Thomas Benzing8,9,10, Patrick H Maxwell11, Daniel P Gale12, Mathias Gorski13,14, Carsten Böger13, Barbara Kollerits15, Florian Kronenberg15, Bernhard Paulweber16, Michalis Zavros3, Alkis Pierides17, Constantinos Deltas1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Recent data emphasize that thin basement membrane nephropathy (TBMN) should not be viewed as a form of benign familial hematuria since chronic renal failure (CRF) and even end-stage renal disease (ESRD), is a possible development for a subset of patients on long-term follow-up, through the onset of focal and segmental glomerulosclerosis (FSGS). We hypothesize that genetic modifiers may explain this variability of symptoms.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28334007 PMCID: PMC5363870 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0174274
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Characteristics of the pooled HEMATURIA cohort.
| Cohort | Origin | N | Mild | Severe | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N (%) | Age: mean (SD) | Females: N (%) | With ESRD: N (%) | N (%) | Age: mean (SD) | Females: N (%) | With ESRD: N (%) | |||
| Cyprus | 103 | 44 (43%) | 60.3 (±10.3) | 26 (59%) | 0 | 59 (57%) | 62.6 (±12.9) | 26 (44%) | 20 (34%) | |
| Cyprus, Greece | 69 | 35 (50%) | 53.7 (±8.7) | 28 (80%) | 0 | 34 (50%) | 55.8 (±12.5) | 13 (38%) | 12 (35%) | |
| Australia | 34 | 22 (65%) | 53.8 (±9.7) | 15 (41%) | 0 | 12 (35%) | 44.9 (±14.8) | 9 (75%) | 0 | |
| Crete (Greece)UK | 318 | 122 (38%) | 40.2 (±11.1) | 51 (42%) | 0 | 196 (62%) | 44.4 (±12.3) | 54 (28%) | 66 (34%) | |
MH: Microscopic Hematuria, ESRD: End-Stage Renal Disease
a Of 103 carriers, 78 carried mutation COL4A3-p.G1334E, 19 carried mutation COL4A3-p.G871C and six carried mutation COL4A4-c.3854delG
b “Mild” patients born before 01/1963
c “Mild” patients born before 01/1968. For A, B, C sub-cohorts, age mean difference for Mild and Severe is not significant (p = 0.298).
Frequencies and statistical analysis of variant NEPH3-p.V353M in the various hematuric sub-cohorts, based on disease severity.
| Genotype counts | Genotype frequency | Allele counts | Allele frequency | Statistics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort | N | VV | VM | MM | VV | VM | MM | V | M | V | M | “Mild” v. “Severe” | “Mild” v. “Severe” | Odds Ratio (Dominant model) |
| General population | 462 | 437 | 25 | 0 | 0.946 | 0.054 | 0 | 899 | 25 | 0.973 | 0.027 | |||
| ExAC Browser | 54373 | 52712 | 1595 | 61 | 0.969 | 0.029 | 0.002 | 105434 | 3312 | 0.969 | 0.031 | |||
| A | 44 | 44 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 88 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | |||
| B | 35 | 35 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 70 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | |||
| C | 22 | 22 | 0 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | 0 | 44 | 0 | 1.0 | 0 | |||
| D | 122 | 119 | 3 | 0 | 0.975 | 0.025 | 0 | 241 | 3 | 0.988 | 0.012 | |||
| 0.987 | 0.013 | 0 | 0.993 | 0.007 | ||||||||||
| A | 59 | 53 | 6 | 0 | 0.898 | 0.102 | 0 | 112 | 6 | 0.949 | 0.051 | |||
| B | 34 | 32 | 2 | 0 | 0.941 | 0.059 | 0 | 66 | 2 | 0.971 | 0.029 | |||
| C | 12 | 10 | 2 | 0 | 0.833 | 0.167 | 0 | 22 | 2 | 0.917 | 0.083 | |||
| D | 196 | 181 | 14 | 1 | 0.923 | 0.071 | 0.006 | 376 | 16 | 0.959 | 0.041 | |||
| 0.917 | 0.080 | 0.003 | 0.957 | 0.043 | ||||||||||
The four sub-cohorts presented here comprise the larger HEMATURIA cohort. Description of sub-cohorts can be found in Table 1.
a Genotypic association analysis p-values (dominant model);
b Allelic association analysis p-values;
c Fisher’s Exact Test (2-sided);
d Adjusted for gender and age;
e Adjusted for patients’ kinships
Demographic data of the three general population cohorts genotyped for NEPH3-p.V353M.
| Microalbuminuria: CASES | No Microalbuminuria: CONTROLS | P values | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort: | 603 (0.092) | 5,928 (0.908) | |
| Age at urine test time | 55.9 (±13.3) | 46.3 (±12.2) | <0.001 |
| Women | 325 out of 603 (0.539) | 3,168 out of 5,928 (0.534) | 0.831 |
| Cohort: | 165 (0.098) | 1,525 (0.902) | |
| Age at urine test time | 51.5 (±5.4) | 51.4(±6.0) | 0.96 |
| Women | 52 out of 165 (0.315) | 578 out of 1,525 (0.379) | 0.11 |
| Cohort: | 397 (0.131) | 2,640 (0.869) | |
| Age at urine test time | 63.8 (±13.1) | 55.0 (±12.9) | < 2.2e-16 |
| Women | 160 out of 397 (0.403) | 1,410 out of 2,640 (0.534) | 1.01e-06 |
Note: Data presented as mean and SD for continuous variables and as absolute numbers and percentages for dichotomous variables. Analytical data for each of these cohorts can be found at [50–52].
Frequencies and statistics of NEPH3-p.V353M in three general population cohorts including a meta-analysis.
| Genotype counts | Genotype frequency | Allele counts | Allele frequency | Statistics | ||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cohort | N | VV | VM | MM | VV | VM | MM | V | M | V | M | Dominant model | Recessivemodel | Odds Ratio (Recessive model) |
| FHS | 5,928 | 5,508 | 415 | 5 | 0.929 | 0.070 | 0.001 | 11,431 | 425 | 0.964 | 0.036 | |||
| KORAF4 | 2,640 | 2,487 | 152 | 1 | 0.942 | 0.057 | 0.001 | 5,126 | 154 | 0.971 | 0.029 | |||
| SAPHIR | 1,525 | 1,423 | 101 | 1 | 0.933 | 0.066 | 0.001 | 2,947 | 103 | 0.966 | 0.034 | |||
| 0.933 | 0.066 | 0.001 | 0.966 | 0.034 | ||||||||||
| FHS | 603 | 561 | 39 | 3 | 0.930 | 0.065 | 0.005 | 1,161 | 45 | 0.963 | 0.037 | 0.946 | ||
| KORAF4 | 397 | 380 | 15 | 2 | 0.957 | 0.037 | 0.006 | 775 | 19 | 0.976 | 0.024 | ND | ||
| SAPHIR | 165 | 153 | 11 | 1 | 0.927 | 0.067 | 0.006 | 317 | 13 | 0.961 | 0.039 | 0.738 | 0.147 | |
| 0.939 | 0.056 | 0.005 | 0.967 | 0.033 | ND | |||||||||
MA: Micro-albuminuria, as defined in Methods section; ND: Not done
a Adjusted p-values for gender and age
Fig 1Flowchart of the genotyping strategy followed to investigate the significance of the two SNPs in four genes that emerged to have functional significance based on the in silico assay (see material and methods).
Black arrow symbolizes the NEPH3-V353M variant which initially derived indicative significant association and was investigated further (black not filled arrows symbolize the meta-analysis). Light grey arrows symbolize the three SNPs found not to be significantly associated in sub-cohort A and not tested further. Dot-lined arrows symbolize the two SNPs that were found to be non-polymorphic in this cohort and not tested further.
Fig 2Alignment of orthologs and paralogs sequences of the Neph3 protein (filtrin) around the 353V residue position.
Note that there is absolute conservation of the relevant amino-acid residue, across a very broad evolutionary range.
Fig 3Co-immunoprecipitation experiments, testing for the binding effectiveness of Neph3 protein with methionine (M) at the 353 position.
(A) Left panel: FLAG-Neph3[353V] and FLAG-Neph3[353M] were immuno-precipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and then they were analyzed by western blot using an anti-HA antibody (for HA-Neph3[353V] and HA-Neph3[353M]) in order to check all possible hetero- and homo-dimer interactions. Neph3[353M]-Neph3[353M] homodimers are strongly increased compared with the Neph3[353V]-Neph3[353M] and the Neph3[353V]-Neph3[353V] ones. Right panel: FLAG-Neph3[353V] and FLAG-Neph3[353M] were immuno-precipitated with anti-FLAG antibody and then they were analyzed by western blot using an anti-V5 antibody (for sV5-Nephrin]. Nephrin-Neph3[353M] heterodimers are slightly increased compared with the Nephrin -Neph3[353V] ones. Anti-V5 and anti-FLAG western blots from lysates (input) were used for loading normalization. V5-NPHP1 (nephrocystin) served as an experiment control. (B) Statistics of densitometry of the blots in Fig 3A, n = 3. Intensity (±SEM) is given as a percentage of wild-type intensity, which is set by definition at 1.0 (100%). There is statistical significance (unpaired t-test) for the homodimerization and heterodimerization comparisons described in Fig 3A. For more details see text.
Fig 4Results of the densitometry analysis of western blots where we assayed the elevation of markers of the unfolded protein response pathway, in the presence of the two NEPH3 alleles (normal “V” vs mutant “M”).
Note that in the presence of tunicamycin (TM, a potent factor adding additional cellular stress), three markers (BiP, IRE1a, p-elF2a) are rising significantly (asterisks mark the significance) for the “M” allele.
Fig 5A proposed hypothetical model for the mechanism of disease development when a causative heterozygous mutation is inherited on the COL4A3/A4 gene or when a heterozygous mutation is co-inherited with a variant on a genetic modifier.
This general model implies that hypomorphic mutations such as NEPH3-p.V353M are benign in heterozygosity on their own but may confer malfunction and impair the integrity of the glomerular filtration barrier when co-inherited with a collagen IV pathogenic mutation, or in homozygosity.