Literature DB >> 28333688

Treatment planning of intensity modulated composite particle therapy with dose and linear energy transfer optimization.

Taku Inaniwa1, Nobuyuki Kanematsu, Koji Noda, Tadashi Kamada.   

Abstract

The biological effect of charged-particle beams depends on both dose and particle spectrum. As one of the physical quantities describing the particle spectrum of charged-particle beams, we considered the linear energy transfer (LET) throughout this study. We investigated a new therapeutic technique using two or more ion species in one treatment session, which we call an intensity modulated composite particle therapy (IMPACT), for optimizing the physical dose and dose-averaged LET distributions in a patient as its proof of principle. Protons and helium, carbon, and oxygen ions were considered as ion species for IMPACT. For three cubic targets of 4  ×  4  ×  4, 8  ×  8  ×  8, and 12  ×  12  ×  12 cm3, defined at the center of the water phantom of 20  ×  20  ×  20 cm3, we made IMPACT plans of two composite fields with opposing and orthogonal geometries. The prescribed dose to the target was fixed at 1 Gy, while the prescribed LET to the target was varied from 1 keV µm-1 to 120 keV µm-1 to investigate the range of LET valid for prescription. The minimum and maximum prescribed LETs, (L T_min, L T_max), by the opposing-field geometry, were (3 keV µm-1, 115 keV µm-1), (2 keV µm-1, 84 keV µm-1),and (2 keV µm-1, 66 keV µm-1), while those by the orthogonal-field geometry were (8 keV µm-1, 98 keV µm-1), (7 keV µm-1, 72 keV µm-1), and (8 keV µm-1, 57 keV µm-1) for the three targets, respectively. To show the proof of principle of IMPACT in a clinical situation, we made IMPACT plans for a prostate case. In accordance with the prescriptions, the LETs in prostate, planning target volume (PTV), and rectum could be adjusted at 80 keV µm-1, at 50 keV µm-1, and below 30 keV µm-1, respectively, while keeping the dose to the PTV at 2 Gy uniformly. IMPACT enables the optimization of the dose and the LET distributions in a patient, which will maximize the potential of charged-particle therapy by expanding the therapeutic window. Further studies and developments will enable this therapeutic technique to be used in clinical practice.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28333688     DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/aa68d7

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  13 in total

1.  Estimation of linear energy transfer distribution for broad-beam carbon-ion radiotherapy at the National Institute of Radiological Sciences, Japan.

Authors:  Nobuyuki Kanematsu; Naruhiro Matsufuji; Taku Inaniwa
Journal:  Radiol Phys Technol       Date:  2018-02-22

2.  Simultaneous optimization of RBE-weighted dose and nanometric ionization distributions in treatment planning with carbon ions.

Authors:  Lucas N Burigo; José Ramos-Méndez; Mark Bangert; Reinhard W Schulte; Bruce Faddegon
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2019-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Performance Evaluation for Repair of HSGc-C5 Carcinoma Cell Using Geant4-DNA.

Authors:  Dousatsu Sakata; Masao Suzuki; Ryoichi Hirayama; Yasushi Abe; Masayuki Muramatsu; Shinji Sato; Oleg Belov; Ioanna Kyriakou; Dimitris Emfietzoglou; Susanna Guatelli; Sebastien Incerti; Taku Inaniwa
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-11-30       Impact factor: 6.639

Review 4.  Emerging Role of Carbon Ion Radiotherapy in Reirradiation of Recurrent Head and Neck Cancers: What Have We Achieved So Far?

Authors:  Tapesh Bhattacharyya; Masashi Koto; Paul Windisch; Hiroaki Ikawa; Yasuhito Hagiwara; Hiroshi Tsuji; Sebastian Adeberg
Journal:  Front Oncol       Date:  2022-05-23       Impact factor: 5.738

5.  Linear energy transfer weighted beam orientation optimization for intensity-modulated proton therapy.

Authors:  Wenbo Gu; Dan Ruan; Wei Zou; Lei Dong; Ke Sheng
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2020-07-13       Impact factor: 4.071

6.  Physics and biomedical challenges of cancer therapy with accelerated heavy ions.

Authors:  Marco Durante; Jürgen Debus; Jay S Loeffler
Journal:  Nat Rev Phys       Date:  2021-09-17

7.  Biomedical Research Programs at Present and Future High-Energy Particle Accelerators.

Authors:  Vincenzo Patera; Yolanda Prezado; Faical Azaiez; Giuseppe Battistoni; Diego Bettoni; Sytze Brandenburg; Aleksandr Bugay; Giacomo Cuttone; Denis Dauvergne; Gilles de France; Christian Graeff; Thomas Haberer; Taku Inaniwa; Sebastien Incerti; Elena Nasonova; Alahari Navin; Marco Pullia; Sandro Rossi; Charlot Vandevoorde; Marco Durante
Journal:  Front Phys       Date:  2020-10-16

Review 8.  Carbon Ion Radiobiology.

Authors:  Walter Tinganelli; Marco Durante
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2020-10-17       Impact factor: 6.575

Review 9.  Carbon-ion Radiotherapy for Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Shigeru Yamada; Hirotoshi Takiyama; Yuka Isozaki; Makoto Shinoto; Hirokazu Makishima; Naoyoshi Yamamoto; Hiroshi Tsuji
Journal:  J Anus Rectum Colon       Date:  2021-04-28

10.  Mechanistic Modelling of Slow and Fast NHEJ DNA Repair Pathways Following Radiation for G0/G1 Normal Tissue Cells.

Authors:  Yaping Qi; John William Warmenhoven; Nicholas Thomas Henthorn; Samuel Peter Ingram; Xie George Xu; Karen Joy Kirkby; Michael John Merchant
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-05-03       Impact factor: 6.639

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.