Literature DB >> 28332507

Blood pressure trajectories in relation to cardiovascular mortality: The Rancho Bernardo Study.

S M A J Tielemans1, J M Geleijnse1, G A Laughlin2, H C Boshuizen1, E Barrett-Connor2, D Kromhout1.   

Abstract

The added value of blood pressure (BP) trajectories for predicting cardiovascular disease (CVD) is currently unknown. We investigated the association of systolic BP (SBP) trajectories with CVD and all-cause mortality and compared these associations with those of average SBP, taking antihypertensive medication into account. Data from 762 participants of the Rancho Bernardo Study were used. SBP from five examinations (maximum) from 1984 to 2002 was used; mortality data were obtained from 2002 to 2013. SBP trajectories were derived using group-based trajectory modelling. Cox proportional hazards analysis was used to investigate associations of trajectories and average SBP with CVD and all-cause mortality, adjusted for age, sex, cholesterol, smoking, diabetes and antihypertensive medication. Mean baseline age was 65.7 years, and 67% were women. Four trajectories were identified, in which mean SBP increased by 5-12 mm Hg during 10 years. The highest trajectories were associated with two to three times greater CVD mortality and 1.5 times greater all-cause mortality risk, compared with the lowest trajectory. Each 20 mmHg increment in average SBP was associated with 1.4 times greater CVD mortality risk and 1.2 times all-cause mortality risk. Associations were not modified by antihypertensive medication (P-interaction>0.10). SBP trajectories were not superior to average SBP in predicting CVD and all-cause mortality. In the general middle-aged and older population of the Rancho Bernardo study, SBP trajectories provided no added value to average SBP in predicting CVD and all-cause mortality. Long-term average SBP levels and trajectories were significant predictors of CVD and all-cause mortality, irrespective of prescribed antihypertensive medication (which in the 1980s-1990s mainly were diuretics and β-blockers).

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28332507     DOI: 10.1038/jhh.2017.20

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Hum Hypertens        ISSN: 0950-9240            Impact factor:   3.012


  11 in total

1.  Mid- to Late-Life Trajectories of Blood Pressure and the Risk of Stroke: The Rotterdam Study.

Authors:  Marileen L P Portegies; Saira Saeed Mirza; Vincentius J A Verlinden; Albert Hofman; Peter J Koudstaal; Sonja A Swanson; M Arfan Ikram
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 10.190

2.  The hypertension detection and follow-up program: Hypertension detection and follow-up program cooperative group.

Authors: 
Journal:  Prev Med       Date:  1976-06       Impact factor: 4.018

3.  Does the relation of blood pressure to coronary heart disease risk change with aging? The Framingham Heart Study.

Authors:  S S Franklin; M G Larson; S A Khan; N D Wong; E P Leip; W B Kannel; D Levy
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  2001-03-06       Impact factor: 29.690

4.  2014 evidence-based guideline for the management of high blood pressure in adults: report from the panel members appointed to the Eighth Joint National Committee (JNC 8).

Authors:  Paul A James; Suzanne Oparil; Barry L Carter; William C Cushman; Cheryl Dennison-Himmelfarb; Joel Handler; Daniel T Lackland; Michael L LeFevre; Thomas D MacKenzie; Olugbenga Ogedegbe; Sidney C Smith; Laura P Svetkey; Sandra J Taler; Raymond R Townsend; Jackson T Wright; Andrew S Narva; Eduardo Ortiz
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 56.272

5.  Age-specific relevance of usual blood pressure to vascular mortality: a meta-analysis of individual data for one million adults in 61 prospective studies.

Authors:  Sarah Lewington; Robert Clarke; Nawab Qizilbash; Richard Peto; Rory Collins
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2002-12-14       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Longitudinal Patterns of Change in Systolic Blood Pressure and Incidence of Cardiovascular Disease: The Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities Study.

Authors:  Natalia Petruski-Ivleva; Anthony J Viera; Daichi Shimbo; Paul Muntner; Christy L Avery; Andrea L C Schneider; David Couper; Anna Kucharska-Newton
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-04-04       Impact factor: 10.190

7.  The Rancho Bernardo Study: 40 years studying why women have less heart disease than men and how diabetes modifies women's usual cardiac protection.

Authors:  Elizabeth Barrett-Connor
Journal:  Glob Heart       Date:  2013-06-01

8.  Ten-year blood pressure trajectories, cardiovascular mortality, and life years lost in 2 extinction cohorts: the Minnesota Business and Professional Men Study and the Zutphen Study.

Authors:  Susanne M A J Tielemans; Johanna M Geleijnse; Alessandro Menotti; Hendriek C Boshuizen; Sabita S Soedamah-Muthu; David R Jacobs; Henry Blackburn; Daan Kromhout
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-03-09       Impact factor: 5.501

9.  Longitudinal Patterns of Blood Pressure, Incident Cardiovascular Events, and All-Cause Mortality in Normotensive Diabetic People.

Authors:  Zhijun Wu; Cheng Jin; Anand Vaidya; Wei Jin; Zhe Huang; Shouling Wu; Xiang Gao
Journal:  Hypertension       Date:  2016-05-23       Impact factor: 10.190

10.  Blood pressure trajectories in early adulthood and subclinical atherosclerosis in middle age.

Authors:  Norrina B Allen; Juned Siddique; John T Wilkins; Christina Shay; Cora E Lewis; David C Goff; David R Jacobs; Kiang Liu; Donald Lloyd-Jones
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 157.335

View more
  5 in total

1.  Longitudinal blood pressure patterns and cardiovascular disease risk.

Authors:  Joel Nuotio; Karri Suvila; Susan Cheng; Ville Langén; Teemu Niiranen
Journal:  Ann Med       Date:  2020-03-13       Impact factor: 4.709

2.  Association between microinfarcts and blood pressure trajectories.

Authors:  Peng-Peng Niu
Journal:  J Hum Hypertens       Date:  2018-04-03       Impact factor: 3.012

3.  Modelling of longitudinal data to predict cardiovascular disease risk: a methodological review.

Authors:  David Stevens; Deirdre A Lane; Stephanie L Harrison; Gregory Y H Lip; Ruwanthi Kolamunnage-Dona
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2021-12-18       Impact factor: 4.615

4.  Evolution of Cardiovascular Risk Factors in a Worker Cohort: A Cluster Analysis.

Authors:  Sara Castel-Feced; Lina Maldonado; Isabel Aguilar-Palacio; Sara Malo; Belén Moreno-Franco; Eusebio Mur-Vispe; José-Tomás Alcalá-Nalvaiz; María José Rabanaque-Hernández
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2021-05-24       Impact factor: 3.390

5.  Long Term Prognostic Impact of Sex-specific Longitudinal Changes in Blood Pressure. The EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tiberiu A Pana; Robert N Luben; Mamas A Mamas; John F Potter; Nicholas J Wareham; Kay-Tee Khaw; Phyo K Myint
Journal:  Eur J Prev Cardiol       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 7.804

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.