Literature DB >> 28331652

Breast Cancer in Turkey: Clinical and Histopathological Characteristics (Analysis of 13.240 Patients).

Vahit Özmen1.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Breast cancer is the most common type of cancer and the leading cause of cancer related deaths in women in Turkey, as elsewhere around the world. However, detailed and systematic demographics, data on clinical and pathological characteristics, and treatment were largely unavailable in Turkey until now. This paper is intended to provide an analysis of clinical and pathological data on women registered in the National Breast Cancer Database (Ulusal Meme Kanseri Veri Tabanı [UMKVT]), established within Turkish Federation of Breast Diseases Societies (TMHDF) and available for use in Turkey since 2005.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Clinical and pathological data on breast cancer patients registered online in the database from May 01, 2005 to May 01, 2011 were investigated. Parameters examined in patients included age, menopausal status, distribution of clinical and pathological stage, histological type, tumor diameter, histological grades, regional lymphatic stage, estrogen (ER), progesterone (PR), HER-2 receptors and molecular subtypes. Analysis results of these parameters were compared with literature data and discussed.
RESULTS: A total of 13,240 patients with breast cancer since April 07, 1992 were included in the study, and 99% of them were female. Female breast cancer patients whose requisite parameters had been completely entered in the database were included in the analysis. The mean age was 51.6 years (±12.6; range 12-97), 17% of them were younger than 40 years of age, and 45% were premenopausal. According to an analysis of age groups at diagnosis, the frequency of cancer peaked at the 45 - 49 age group with 16.7%, declining to 7.6% in the 65-69 age group, and then rose again. Most of the patients (78.7%) had invasive ductal, 7.8% were invasive lobular cancers, 9.8% were invasive mixed cancers (invasive ductal + invasive lobular), and 4% were other histological types (e.g. inflammatory, intracystic papillary, mucinous, etc.), respectively. Half of them (50%) had grade III histology. According to an analysis of pathological stages of all breast cancers (stage 0 - IV), 5% were stage 0, 27% were stage I, 44% were stage II, 21% were stage III, and 3% were stage IV breast cancer, respectively. The mean tumor diameter was 2.5 cm (±1.6; range 0.1-20 cm). The rates of lymphatic stages were pN0 50%, pN1 28%, pN2 15%, and pN3 7%, respectively. ER, PR, and HER-2 receptors were positive in 70%, 59%, and 23% of patients. A subtype analysis of tumors showed that 62% were type luminal A. This was followed by subtypes luminal B (15%), triple negative (15%), and HER-2 positive (8.5%).
CONCLUSION: As a conclusion patients with breast cancer in our breast cancer registry program were younger, and had more advanced disease, and worse prognostic factors than patients in developed countries.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Turkey; breast cancer; hormone receptors; molecular subtypes; pathology; prognostic factors; stages

Year:  2014        PMID: 28331652      PMCID: PMC5351477          DOI: 10.5152/tjbh.2014.1988

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Breast Health        ISSN: 1306-0945


  32 in total

1.  Breast cancer in very young women.

Authors:  S Liukkonen; M Leidenius; T Saarto; J Sjöström-Mattson
Journal:  Eur J Surg Oncol       Date:  2011-09-21       Impact factor: 4.424

Review 2.  Clinical practice. Breast-cancer screening.

Authors:  Ellen Warner
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2011-09-15       Impact factor: 91.245

3.  HER2/neu amplification in breast cancer: stratification by tumor type and grade.

Authors:  Elise R Hoff; Raymond R Tubbs; Jonathan L Myles; Gary W Procop
Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol       Date:  2002-06       Impact factor: 2.493

4.  Breast cancer classification according to immunohistochemical markers: clinicopathologic features and short-term survival analysis in a population-based study from the South of Switzerland.

Authors:  A Spitale; P Mazzola; D Soldini; L Mazzucchelli; A Bordoni
Journal:  Ann Oncol       Date:  2008-12-12       Impact factor: 32.976

5.  Age as prognostic factor in premenopausal breast carcinoma.

Authors:  A de la Rochefordiere; B Asselain; F Campana; S M Scholl; J Fenton; J R Vilcoq; J C Durand; P Pouillart; H Magdelenat; A Fourquet
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1993-04-24       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Young age at diagnosis correlates with worse prognosis and defines a subset of breast cancers with shared patterns of gene expression.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Chaitanya R Acharya; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; P Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Phillip G Febbo; Joseph R Nevins; Anil Potti; Kimberly L Blackwell
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2008-07-10       Impact factor: 44.544

7.  The decrease in breast-cancer incidence in 2003 in the United States.

Authors:  Peter M Ravdin; Kathleen A Cronin; Nadia Howlader; Christine D Berg; Rowan T Chlebowski; Eric J Feuer; Brenda K Edwards; Donald A Berry
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 91.245

8.  Surgical treatment of early stage breast cancer in elderly: an international comparison.

Authors:  M Kiderlen; E Bastiaannet; P M Walsh; N L Keating; S Schrodi; J Engel; W van de Water; S M Ess; L van Eycken; A Miranda; L de Munck; C J H van de Velde; A J M de Craen; G J Liefers
Journal:  Breast Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2011-11-27       Impact factor: 4.872

9.  Biological Markers in DCIS and Risk of Breast Recurrence: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Sara A Lari; Henry M Kuerer
Journal:  J Cancer       Date:  2011-05-01       Impact factor: 4.207

10.  Age-specific differences in oncogenic pathway deregulation seen in human breast tumors.

Authors:  Carey K Anders; Chaitanya R Acharya; David S Hsu; Gloria Broadwater; Katherine Garman; John A Foekens; Yi Zhang; Yixin Wang; Kelly Marcom; Jeffrey R Marks; Sayan Mukherjee; Joseph R Nevins; Kimberly L Blackwell; Anil Potti
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2008-01-02       Impact factor: 3.240

View more
  19 in total

1.  Radiation interaction parameters for blood samples of breast cancer patients: an MCNP study.

Authors:  Ozan Toker; Mustafa Caglar; Ersoy Oz; Sezgin Bakirdere; Omer Topdagi; Onder Eyecioglu; Orhan Icelli
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2019-07-01       Impact factor: 1.925

2.  Controversies on Mammography Screening in the World and Bahceşehir Population-Based Organized Mammography Screening Project in Turkey.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2015-10-01

3.  Correlations Between Oncotype DX Recurrence Score and Classic Risk Factors in Early Breast Cancer: Results of A Prospective Multicenter Study in Turkey.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Ajlan Atasoy; Erhan Gökmen; Mustafa Özdoğan; Nilufer Güler; Cihan Uras; Engin Ok; Orhan Demircan; Abdurrahman Işıkkdoğan; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Fatma Şen; Pınar Saip
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-07-01

4.  Barriers Against Mammographic Screening in a Socioeconomically Underdeveloped Population: A Population-based, Cross-sectional Study.

Authors:  Tolga Özmen; Salih Yüce; Tekin Güler; Canan Ulun; Nilufer Özaydın; Sandhya Pruthi; Nezih Akkapulu; Koray Karabulut; Atilla Soran; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-04-01

5.  Turkish Ministry of Health, 2nd Turkish Medical General Assembly Clinical Oncology Study Group Report.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Nergiz Dağoğlu; İsmet Dede; Adem Akçakaya; Mustafa Kerem; Fatih Göksel; Enver Özgür; Emel Başkan; Mustafa Yaylacı; Adil Ceydeli; Meltem Baykara; Huriye Şenay Kızıltan; Şeref Kömürcü; Mahmut Gümüş; H Mehmet Türk; Recep Demirhan; Ali Akgün; Naim Kadoglou; Emre Yatman; Cem Cüneyt Elbi; Seza Güleç; Atilla Soran; Ahmet Özet; Fahrettin Keleştimur
Journal:  J Breast Health       Date:  2016-01-01

6.  Cost-Effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening in Turkey, a Developing Country: Results from Bahçeşehir Mammography Screening Project.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Sibel Ö Gürdal; Neslihan Cabioğlu; Beyza Özcinar; A Nilüfer Özaydın; Arda Kayhan; Erkin Arıbal; Cennet Sahin; Pınar Saip; Oğuzhan Alagöz
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2017-07-01

7.  The Effect of Mini-Latissimus Dorsi Flap (MLDF) Reconstruction on Shoulder Function in Breast Cancer Patients.

Authors:  Tomris Duymaz; Zeynep Erdoğan İyigün; Ahmet Serkan İlgün; Çetin Ordu; Muhammed Üçüncü; Gül Alço; Alper Öztürk; Filiz Elbüken; Fatma Aktepe; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

8.  Cost effectiveness of Gene Expression Profiling in Patients with Early-Stage Breast Cancer in a Middle-Income Country, Turkey: Results of a Prospective Multicenter Study.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Burcu Çakar; Erhan Gökmen; Mustafa Özdoğan; Nilufer Güler; Cihan Uras; Engin Ok; Orhan Demircan; Abdurrahman Işıkdoğan; Pınar Saip
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

9.  Breast Cancer in Turkey; An Analysis of 20.000 Patients with Breast Cancer.

Authors:  Vahit Özmen; Tolga Özmen; Volkan Doğru
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2019-07-01

10.  Prognostic Significance of Adjuvant Chemotherapy Induced Amenorrhea in Luminal A and B Subtypes.

Authors:  Çetin Ordu; Kezban Nur Pilancı; Gül Alço; Filiz Elbüken; Ülkühan İner Köksal; Serkan İlgun; Dauren Sarsenov; Ayşe Esra Aydın; Alper Öztürk; Zeynep İyigün Erdoğan; Filiz Ağaçayak; Fatmagül Çubuk; Coşkun Tecimer; Yeşim Eralp; Tomris Duymaz; Fatma Aktepe; Vahit Özmen
Journal:  Eur J Breast Health       Date:  2018-07-01
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.