| Literature DB >> 28330276 |
Hirdayesh Anuragi1,2,3, Haresh L Dhaduk1, Sushil Kumar4, Jitendra J Dhruve3, Mithil J Parekh2, Amar A Sakure2.
Abstract
Understanding the genetic variation in germplasm is of utmost importance for crop improvement. Therefore, efforts were made to analyse the molecular marker based genetic diversity of 20 Annona genotypes from five different species of family Annonaceae. During analysis, a set of 11 RAPD primers yielded a total of 152 bands with 80.01 % polymorphism and PIC for RAPD ranged from 0.86 to 0.92 with a mean of 0.89. With 93.05 % polymorphism, 12 SSR primers produced 39 amplicons. The PIC for SSRs ranged from 0.169 to 0.694 with of average of 0.339. The dendrogram produced from pooled molecular data of 11 RAPD and 12 SSR primers showed seven clusters at a cutoff value of 0.78. The dendrogram discriminated all the Annona genotypes suggesting that significant genetic diversity was present among the genotypes. Proximate fruit composition study of nine fruiting genotypes of Annona revealed that A. squamosa possessed significantly higher amount of most of studies biochemical which gives an opportunity to fruit breeders to improve the other Annona species. Likewise, A. muricata being rich in seed oil content can be exploited in oil industries.Entities:
Keywords: Annona; Fruit proximate composition; Genetic diversity; RAPD; SSR
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330276 PMCID: PMC5035287 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0520-9
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
List of Annona accessions used in present study
| Species | Accession | Collection area | Proximate analysis |
|---|---|---|---|
|
| – | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| – | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| – | Gir Forest, Gujarat | ✓ |
|
| – | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| Red Sitaphal | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| Anand Selection | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| Sindhan | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| Balanagar | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| GJCA-1 | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | ✓ |
|
| Vidyanagar local | Anand, Gujarat | × |
|
| ACC-1 | Mumbai, Maharashtra | × |
|
| ACC-2 | Mumbai, Maharashtra | × |
|
| ACC-3 | Mumbai, Maharashtra | × |
|
| ACC-4 | Hyderabad, Telangana | × |
|
| ACC-5 | Hyderabad, Telangana | × |
|
| ACC-6 | Mumbai, Maharashtra | × |
|
| Sindhan × Anand Selection | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | × |
|
| Sindhan × Balanagar | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | × |
|
| Anand Selection × Balanagar | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | × |
|
| Balanagar × Red Sitaphal | Horticulture farm, AAU, Anand | × |
Fig. 1Fruit of different Annona species 1 A. cherimola; 2 A. reticulata; 3 A. muricata; 4 A. atemoya; 5 A. squamosa 6 Red Sitaphal; 7 Anand Selection; 8 Sindhan; 9 Balanagar and 10 GJCA-1
Characterization of RAPD primers among different genotypes of Annona species
| Locus name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Fragment size (bp) | Number of loci | Number of polymorphic loci | Polymorphism (%) | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OPB-6 | TGCTCTGCCC | 423–1406 | 13 | 12 | 92.30 | 0.89 |
| OPB-7 | GGTGACGCAG | 146–1322 | 19 | 18 | 94.73 | 0.92 |
| OPB-8 | GTCCACACGG | 209–1328 | 16 | 14 | 87.50 | 0.89 |
| OPB-10 | CTGCTGGGAC | 294–1166 | 15 | 10 | 66.67 | 0.92 |
| OPB-12 | CCTTGACGCA | 246–1391 | 16 | 15 | 93.75 | 0.89 |
| OPD-2 | GGACCCAACC | 311–1325 | 10 | 8 | 80.00 | 0.86 |
| OPD-16 | AGGGCGTAAG | 180–1305 | 14 | 5 | 35.71 | 0.92 |
| OPD-20 | ACCCGGTCAC | 302–1268 | 11 | 6 | 54.54 | 0.89 |
| OPF-4 | GGTGATCAGG | 395–1308 | 12 | 10 | 83.33 | 0.86 |
| OPF-5 | CCGAATTCCC | 404–1400 | 14 | 14 | 100.00 | 0.87 |
| OPF-10 | GGAAGCTTGG | 451–1362 | 12 | 11 | 91.66 | 0.87 |
| Total | 152 | 123 | – | 9.79 | ||
| Average | 13.81 | 11.18 | 80.01 | 0.89 |
Characterization of SSR primers among different genotypes of Annona species
| Locus name | Sequence (5′–3′) | Fragment size (bp) | Number of alleles | Number of polymorphic alleles | Polymorphism (%) | PIC |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| LMCH-29 | F: GTACCATCTTTTAGGAAATC | 196–280 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 0.496 |
| R: TGCAATCTATGTTAGTCAC | ||||||
| LMCH-43 | F: CTAGTTCCAAGACGTGAGAGAT | 210–375 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.177 |
| R: ATAGGAATAAGGGACTGTTGAG | ||||||
| LMCH-48 | F: TTAGAGTGAAAAGCGGCAAG | 157–192 | 2 | 1 | 50 | 0.227 |
| R: TCAAGCTACAGAAAGTCTACCG | ||||||
| LMCH-70 | F: GAAGTTTTAGAGGCGATTCC | 152–178 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.254 |
| R: TTTTGCCACTTTACTGTCAC | ||||||
| LMCH-71 | F: AGATAACACCCGCCCACTAT | 282–497 | 3 | 2 | 66.67 | 0.169 |
| R: ACAACTTTTCTCCCAACCTATC | ||||||
| LMCH-78 | F: ATTTGATTGATTGATTTCCTA | 172–235 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.265 |
| R: CTTTTGCTTTCTTTCACATC | ||||||
| LMCH-79 | F: GAAGCAAGTAGACACGTAGTA | 212–384 | 5 | 5 | 100 | 0.694 |
| R: AGGGTTGGTATTTCTTTATAGT | ||||||
| LMCH-112 | F: TAACCCAGGATCTACAATAAT | 194–278 | 4 | 4 | 100 | 0.525 |
| R: TTGCATACATTTTCCTATTT | ||||||
| LMCH-114 | F: AAAATGTAGTGTGAAAGATGAC | 202–246 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.351 |
| R: GTCCATTCAGTTTTAAGTGC | ||||||
| LMCH-119 | F: CAGAAAATTAGCAGAGGACTCA | 191–287 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.265 |
| R: GTGGGTTGGGTTTTTAGGTC | ||||||
| LMCH-122 | F: AGCAAAGATAAAGAGAAGATAA | 190–212 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.310 |
| R: ATCCAAGCCTATTAACAACT | ||||||
| LMCH-128 | F: CTTGTTAAAATGGCTGTTACT | 252–288 | 3 | 3 | 100 | 0.343 |
| R: GCATTGAGCTGACATAACTC | ||||||
| Total | 39 | 37 | – | 4.068 | ||
| Average | 3.25 | 3.08 | 93.05 | 0.339 |
Fig. 2DNA amplification profile of RAPD (OPB-7 and OPB-16) and SSR (LMCH-29 and LMCH-79) markers
Fig. 3Dendrogram of 20 Annona genotypes based on combined RAPD and SSR data. (5. Red Sitaphal, 6. Anand Selection, 7. Sindhan, 8. Balanagar, 9. GJCA-1, 10. Vidyanagar Local, 11. ACC-1, 12. ACC-2, 13. ACC-3, 14. ACC-4, 15. ACC-5, 16. ACC-6, 17. Sindhan × Anand Selection, 18. Sindhan × Balanagar, 19. Anand Selection × Balanagar and 20. Balanagar × Red Sitaphal)
Statistics of fruit (pulp) quality parameters (fresh weight basis) and seed oil content (OC) of nine Annona genotypes [repetitions (n) = 2]
| Genotypes | MC (%) | AC (%) | TC (%) | TSS (%) | RS (%) | FC (%) | PC (%) | PhC (%) | TA (%) | Asc (mg/100 g) | OC (%) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| 79.26 | 1.56 | 17.54 | 14.41 | 4.33 | 2.22 | 1.69 | 0.35 | 0.36 | 19.60 | 29.33 |
|
| 73.00 | 1.48 | 22.71 | 14.89 | 4.80 | 2.18 | 1.85 | 0.41 | 0.38 | 23.36 | 29.05 |
|
| 81.23 | 1.69 | 16.48 | 8.92 | 3.27 | 2.34 | 1.15 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 39.24 | 32.50 |
|
| 76.63 | 1.62 | 20.71 | 14.62 | 6.67 | 3.82 | 1.84 | 0.40 | 0.37 | 32.74 | 28.41 |
|
| 73.99 | 1.36 | 23.24 | 16.62 | 7.81 | 3.28 | 1.97 | 0.3 | 0.22 | 31.53 | 25.39 |
| - Red Sitaphal | 74.48 | 1.41 | 22.51 | 16.08 | 7.49 | 3.28 | 1.78 | 0.34 | 0.29 | 28.41 | 23.13 |
| - Anand Selection | 74.42 | 1.32 | 22.66 | 16.29 | 7.61 | 3.18 | 1.81 | 0.31 | 0.24 | 32.21 | 24.41 |
| - Sindhan | 73.65 | 1.43 | 23.04 | 16.69 | 7.81 | 3.38 | 2.13 | 0.26 | 0.23 | 32.06 | 26.56 |
| - Balanagar | 74.85 | 1.32 | 23.95 | 17.44 | 8.39 | 3.24 | 2.14 | 0.29 | 0.17 | 33.39 | 26.52 |
| - GJCA-1 | 72.55 | 1.32 | 24.05 | 16.63 | 7.75 | 3.32 | 1.98 | 0.30 | 0.19 | 31.57 | 26.35 |
| Minimum | 72.55 | 1.32 | 16.48 | 8.92 | 3.27 | 2.18 | 1.15 | 0.26 | 0.17 | 19.60 | 23.13 |
| Maximum | 81.23 | 1.69 | 24.05 | 17.44 | 8.39 | 3.82 | 2.14 | 0.50 | 0.65 | 39.24 | 32.50 |
| Mean | 75.56 | 1.46 | 21.52 | 15.11 | 6.46 | 3.00 | 1.82 | 0.35 | 0.32 | 30.29 | 27.36 |
| CD @ 5 % | 5.37 | 0.14 | 2.16 | 1.31 | 0.48 | 0.38 | 0.34 | 0.05 | 0.05 | 3.50 | 3.10 |
| SD | 2.94 | 0.14 | 2.74 | 2.54 | 1.84 | 0.59 | 0.29 | 0.07 | 0.15 | 5.81 | 2.81 |
| S.Em ± | 1.79 | 0.05 | 0.72 | 0.44 | 0.16 | 0.13 | 0.11 | 0.02 | 0.02 | 1.17 | 1.03 |
| CV (%) | 4.11 | 5.67 | 5.80 | 5.02 | 4.30 | 7.35 | 10.72 | 8.86 | 9.59 | 6.67 | 6.55 |
MC moisture content, AC ash content, TC total carbohydrates, TSS total soluble sugars, RS reducing sugars, FC fibre content, PC protein content, PhC phenol content, TA titratable acidity ASC ascorbic acid content, OC seed oil content