| Literature DB >> 28330239 |
Selvam Kandasamy1, Govarthanan Muthusamy2, Senthilkumar Balakrishnan3,4, Senbagam Duraisamy5, Selvankumar Thangasamy6, Kamala-Kannan Seralathan7, Sudhakar Chinnappan8.
Abstract
The aim of the study was to identify new sources of substrate from agro-industrial waste for protease production using Bacillus sp., a local bacteria isolated from an agro-waste dumping site. The strain was identified as Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3 by 16S rRNA sequence followed by phylogenic analysis. Response surface methodology-based Box-Behnken design (BBD) was used to optimize the variables such as pH, incubation time, coffee pulp waste (CPW) and corncob (CC) substrate concentration. The BBD design showed a reasonable adjustment of the quadratic model with the experimental data. Statistics-based contour and 3-D plots were generated to evaluate the changes in the response surface and understand the relationship between the culture conditions and the enzyme yield. The maximum yield of protease production (920 U/mL) was achieved after 60 h of incubation with 3.0 g/L of CPW and 2.0 g/L of CC at pH 8 and temperature 37 °C in this study. The molecular mass of the purified enzyme was 46 kDa. The highest activity was obtained at 50 °C and pH 9 for the purified enzymes.Entities:
Keywords: Bacillus sp.; Coffee pulp waste; Corncobs; Protease; Response surface methodology; SSF
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330239 PMCID: PMC4987632 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0481-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Fig. 116S rRNA-based phylogenetic analysis of Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3. Bootstrap values and scale bar depicting the substitution rate per site are indicated. The phylogenetic tree constructed by the neighbor-joining method showing the position of isolate BT MASC 3
Fig. 2a Scanning electron microscopy (SEM) of the coffee pulp waste (CPW) surface. A Untreated CPW; B pre-treated with NaOH, corncob (CC) surface. C untreated CC; D pre-treated with NaOH, b FTIR of the coffee pulp waste (CPW). A untreated CPW; B pre-treated with NaOH, corncob (CC); C untreated CC; D pre-treated with NaOH
Box–Behnken design for the variables and the experimentally observed responses
| Run | pH | Incubation time | Coffee pulp waste (%) | Corncobs (%) | Protease (U/mL) |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 10 | 60 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 452 |
| 2 | 6 | 96 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 456 |
| 3 | 8 | 60 | 1.00 | 1.00 | 670 |
| 4 | 8 | 60 | 5.00 | 3.00 | 780 |
| 5 | 8 | 60 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 914 |
| 6 | 6 | 60 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 510 |
| 7 | 8 | 24 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 530 |
| 8 | 8 | 60 | 5.00 | 1.00 | 487 |
| 9 | 8 | 24 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 535 |
| 10 | 8 | 96 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 625 |
| 11 | 8 | 96 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 513 |
| 12 | 10 | 60 | 1.00 | 2.00 | 475 |
| 13 | 6 | 60 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 445 |
| 14 | 6 | 60 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 460 |
| 15 | 8 | 96 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 745 |
| 16 | 8 | 96 | 3.00 | 3.00 | 750 |
| 17 | 8 | 60 | 1.00 | 3.00 | 655 |
| 18 | 8 | 60 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 910 |
| 19 | 6 | 24 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 440 |
| 20 | 10 | 96 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 445 |
| 21 | 8 | 60 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 900 |
| 22 | 6 | 60 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 537 |
| 23 | 8 | 60 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 920 |
| 24 | 10 | 60 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 560 |
| 25 | 8 | 60 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 918 |
| 26 | 8 | 24 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 600 |
| 27 | 10 | 60 | 5.00 | 2.00 | 475 |
| 28 | 10 | 24 | 3.00 | 2.00 | 435 |
| 29 | 8 | 24 | 3.00 | 1.00 | 615 |
Analysis of variance (ANOVA) for the response surface quadratic model
| Source | Sum of squares | Df | Mean square |
|
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Model | 7.577E + 005 | 14 | 54120.14 | 15.67 | <0.0001 |
|
| 3.00 | 1 | 3.00 | 8.688E − 004 | 0.9769 |
|
| 11970.08 | 1 | 11970.08 | 3.47 | 0.0837 |
|
| 494.08 | 1 | 494.08 | 0.14 | 0.7109 |
|
| 4408.33 | 1 | 4408.33 | 1.28 | 0.2775 |
|
| 9.00 | 1 | 9.00 | 2.607E − 003 | 0.9600 |
|
| 625.00 | 1 | 625.00 | 0.18 | 0.6770 |
|
| 64.00 | 1 | 64.00 | 0.019 | 0.8936 |
|
| 756.25 | 1 | 756.25 | 0.22 | 0.6470 |
|
| 25921.00 | 1 | 25921.00 | 7.51 | 0.0160 |
|
| 23716.00 | 1 | 23716.00 | 6.87 | 0.0201 |
|
| 5.635E + 005 | 1 | 5.635E + 005 | 163.20 | <0.0001 |
|
| 1.872E + 005 | 1 | 1.872E + 005 | 54.21 | <0.0001 |
|
| 1.077E + 005 | 1 | 1.077E + 005 | 31.20 | <0.0001 |
|
| 1.126E + 005 | 1 | 1.126E + 005 | 32.60 | <0.0001 |
| Residual | 48340.28 | 14 | 3452.88 | – | – |
| Lack of fit | 48089.08 | 10 | 4808.91 | 76.57 | 0.0004 |
| Pure error | 251.20 | 4 | 62.80 | – | – |
| Cor total | 8.060E + 005 | 28 | – | – | – |
Fig. 33-D plots of the combined effects of two variables on protease production by Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3
Fig. 4a SDS-PAGE, b zymogram of purified protease produced by Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3, M molecular weight marker (phosphorylase B 97.4 kDa, albumin 66 kDa, ovalbumin 43 kDa, carbonic anhydrase 29 kDa, trypsin inhibitor 20.1 kDa, α-lactalbumin 14.3 kDa), E-purified protease enzyme
Fig. 5a Effect of temperature on the activity and stability of purified protease of Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3. b Effect of pH on the activity and stability of purified protease of Bacillus sp. BT MASC 3