| Literature DB >> 28330145 |
Tatyaso Yewale1,2, Shruti Panchwagh1, Srinivasan Rajagopalan2, Pradip B Dhamole2,3, Rishi Jain4,5.
Abstract
This study reports an industrially applicable non-sterile xylitol fermentation process to produce xylitol from a low-cost feedstock like corn cob hydrolysate as pentose source without any detoxification. Different immobilization matrices/mediums (alginate, polyvinyl alcohol, agarose gel, polyacrylamide, gelatin, and κ-carrageenan) were studied to immobilize Candida tropicalis NCIM 3123 cells for xylitol production. Amongst this calcium alginate, immobilized cells produced maximum amount of xylitol with titer of 11.1 g/L and yield of 0.34 g/g. Hence, the process for immobilization using calcium alginate beads was optimized using a statistical method with sodium alginate (20, 30 and 40 g/L), calcium chloride (10, 20 and 30 g/L) and number of freezing-thawing cycles (2, 3 and 4) as the parameters. Using optimized conditions (calcium chloride 10 g/L, sodium alginate 20 g/L and 4 number of freezing-thawing cycles) for immobilization, xylitol production increased significantly to 41.0 g/L (4 times the initial production) with corn cob hydrolysate as sole carbon source and urea as minimal nutrient source. Reuse of immobilized biomass showed sustained xylitol production even after five cycles.Entities:
Keywords: Calcium alginate; Candida tropicalis; Corn cob hemicellulosic hydrolysate; Immobilization
Year: 2016 PMID: 28330145 PMCID: PMC4755960 DOI: 10.1007/s13205-016-0388-8
Source DB: PubMed Journal: 3 Biotech ISSN: 2190-5738 Impact factor: 2.406
Experimental matrix of full factorial design of experiments and xylitol yield (Y p/s), volumetric productivity (Q P) and encapsulation efficiency in the pellet (EE), after 96-h fermentation according to 23 full factorial design
| Test run | Coded variable | Response | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| SA (%) | CC (%) | FTN (no. of cycles) |
|
| EE (%) | |
| 1 | −1 (2.0) | −1 (1.0) | −1 (2) | 0.61 ± 0.01 | 0.26 ± 0.01 | 99.21 ± 0.42 |
| 2 | +1 (4.0) | −1 (1.0) | −1 (2) | 0.52 ± 0.02 | 0.18 ± 0.02 | 99.44 ± 0.20 |
| 3 | −1 (2.0) | +1 (3.0) | −1 (2) | 0.58 ± 0.01 | 0.24 ± 0.01 | 99.67 ± 0.23 |
| 4 | +1 (4.0) | +1 (3.0) | −1 (2) | 0.56 ± 0.02 | 0.20 ± 0.01 | 99.49 ± 0.26 |
| 5 | −1 (2.0) | −1 (1.0) | +1 (4.0) | 0.74 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 99.94 ± 0.04 |
| 6 | +1 (4.0) | −1 (1.0) | +1 (4) | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.39 ± 0.0 | 99.59 ± 0.12 |
| 7 | −1 (2.0) | +1 (3.0) | +1 (4) | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.01 | 99.37 ± 0.05 |
| 8 | +1 (4.0) | +1 (3.0) | +1 (4) | 0.71 ± 0.01 | 0.40 ± 0.00 | 99.37 ± 0.40 |
| 9 | 0 (1.0) | 0 (2.0) | 0 (3) | 0.50 ± 0.01 | 0.16 ± 0.01 | 99.66 ± 0.36 |
| 10 | 0 (1.0) | 0 (2.0) | 0 (3) | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.17 ± 0.01 | 99.67 ± 0.23 |
| 11 | 0 (1.0) | 0 (2.0) | 0 (3) | 0.51 ± 0.01 | 0.18 ± 0.01 | 99.76 ± 0.22 |
SA sodium alginate, CC calcium chloride, FTN freezing–thawing cycle no. Yield (Y p/s); productivity, Q P (g/L/h); Immobilization efficiency, EE (%)
Fig. 1Comparative fermentation study of various matrices in relation to residual xylose and xylitol produced after 96 h in non-detoxified hydrolysate. Black bar xylose and grey bar xylitol
Fig. 2Pareto charts of independent variables and their interaction on each response variable. a Yield, b productivity, c immobilization efficiency
Fig. 3Fermentation profile of xylose to xylitol using optimized immobilized beads. a Consumption of xylose, arabinose, glucose and acetic acid as well as xylitol production. b Profile of fermentation performance with immobilized bead in shake flask (initial xylose, 57.2 g/L; pH 5.92; Temperature 30 °C). c Concentration profile of free cells, cells immobilized in the calcium alginate and pH during fermentation of corn cob hemicellulosic hydrolysate. Error bars represent variation between the duplicate trials
Results of xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion by C. tropicalis cells immobilized in calcium alginate beads after 96 h of cultivation in medium based on corn cob hemicellulosic hydrolysate
| Percentage of xylose consumption (%) | 98 |
| Final xylitol concentration (g/L) | 41 |
| Yield of xylitol on consumed xylose (g/g) | 0.73 |
| Xylitol productivity (g/L/h) | 0.43 |
Comparison with other Candida sp. and yeast fermentation performance
| Microorganism | Feedstock/Method of detoxification | Xylitol production | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Concentration (g/L) | Yield (g/g) | Productivity (g/L/h) | References | ||
|
| Corn cob hydrolysate, detoxification with lime | – | 0.66 | 1.90 | Wang et al. ( |
| Hydrogel copolymer immobilized | Corn cob hydrolysate with detoxification by resin and charcoal treatment | 48.5 | 0.58 | – | El-Batal and Khalaf ( |
|
| Crude corn cob hydrolysate without detoxification (shake flask) | 12.9 | 0.53 | 0.23 | Bibbins et al. ( |
|
| Corn cob hydrolysate with calcium oxide treatment and charcoal treatment | – | 0.58 | 0.39 | Cheng et al. ( |
|
| Corn cob hemicellulosic hydrolysate without detoxification | 38.8 | 0.70 | 0.46 | Ping et al. ( |
|
| Rice straw hydrolysate, detoxified with Calcium oxide and charcoal treatment | – | 0.73 | – | Liaw et al. ( |
|
| Rice straw hydrolysate with lime treatment and charcoal treatment | 74 | 0.73 | 0.533 | Deng et al. ( |
|
| Rice straw hydrolysate without detoxification | 31.1 | 0.71 | 0.44 | Huang et al. ( |
|
| Rice straw hydrolysate without detoxification | 50 | 0.67 | 0.41 | Silva and Roberto ( |
|
| SCB hydrolysate with detoxification | 21 | 0.54 | 0.44 | Carvalho et al. ( |
|
| Sugar cane bagasse hemicellulosic hydrolysate detoxification with ion exchange resin | – | 0.62 | 0.24 | Carvalho et al. ( |
|
| Sugarcane bagasse hydrolysate with detoxification | 28.9 | 0.58 | 0.40 | Sarrouh et al. ( |
|
| SCB hydrolysate with charcoal and ion exchange resin | – | 0.69 | 0.28 | Gyan et al. ( |
|
| Poplar wood chips concentrated and neutralised | – | 0.40 | – | Jing et al. ( |
|
| Corn cob hydrolysate without detoxification (optimized condition) | 41 | 0.73 | 0.43 | This study |
Fig. 4Repeated batch xylose-to-xylitol bioconversion with cell recycling (initial xylose: 52 g/L; temp: 30 °C, agitation: 150 rpm)