Literature DB >> 28329389

Radial versus femoral access in patients with acute coronary syndromes with or without ST-segment elevation.

Pascal Vranckx1, Enrico Frigoli2, Martina Rothenbühler3, Francesco Tomassini4, Stefano Garducci5, Giuseppe Andò6, Andrea Picchi7, Paolo Sganzerla8, Anita Paggi9, Fabrizio Ugo10, Arturo Ausiello11, Gennaro Sardella12, Nicoletta Franco13, Marco Nazzaro14, Nicoletta de Cesare15, Paolo Tosi16, Camillo Falcone17, Carlo Vigna18, Pietro Mazzarotto19, Emilio Di Lorenzo20, Claudio Moretti21, Gianluca Campo22, Carlo Penzo23, Giampaolo Pasquetto24, Dik Heg3, Peter Jüni25, Stephan Windecker26, Marco Valgimigli26.   

Abstract

Aims: To assess whether radial compared with femoral access is associated with consistent outcomes in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) and non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome (NSTE-ACS). Methods and results: In the Minimizing Adverse Haemorrhagic Events by TRansradial Access Site and Systemic Implementation of angioX (MATRIX) programme patients were randomized to radial or femoral access, stratified by STEMI (2001 radial, 2009 femoral) and NSTE-ACS (2196 radial, 2198 femoral). The 30-day co-primary outcomes were major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), defined as death, myocardial infarction, or stroke, and net adverse clinical events (NACE), defined as MACE or major bleeding In the overall study population, radial access reduced the NACE but not MACE endpoint at the prespecified 0.025 alpha. MACE occurred in 121 (6.1%) STEMI patients with radial access vs. 126 (6.3%) patients with femoral access [rate ratio (RR) = 0.96, 95% CI = 0.75-1.24; P = 0.76] and in 248 (11.3%) NSTE-ACS patients with radial access vs. 303 (13.9%) with femoral access (RR = 0.80, 95% CI = 0.67-0.96; P = 0.016) (Pint = 0.25). NACE occurred in 142 (7.2%) STEMI patients with radial access and in 165 (8.3%) patients with femoral access (RR = 0.86, 95% CI = 0.68-1.08; P = 0.18) and in 268 (12.2%) NSTE-ACS patients with radial access compared with 321 (14.7%) with femoral access (RR = 0.82, 95% CI = 0.69-0.97; P = 0.023) (Pint = 0.76). All-cause mortality and access site-actionable bleeding favoured radial access irrespective of ACS type (Pint = 0.11 and Pint = 0.36, respectively).
Conclusion: Radial as compared with femoral access provided consistent benefit across the whole spectrum of patients with ACS, without evidence that type of presenting syndrome affected the results of the random access allocation. Published on behalf of the European Society of Cardiology. All rights reserved.
© The Author 2017. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Femoral ; MATRIX ; NSTE-ACS; Radial ; STEMI

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28329389     DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehx048

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Heart J        ISSN: 0195-668X            Impact factor:   29.983


  14 in total

Review 1.  Transradial Artery Access in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for ST-Segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Cardiogenic Shock.

Authors:  Matthew S Schoenfeld; Ibrahim Kassas; Binita Shah
Journal:  Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med       Date:  2018-02-24

2.  Improved in-hospital outcome for radial access in a large contemporary cohort of primary percutaneous coronary intervention.

Authors:  Matthias Hasun; Jakob Dörler; Hannes F Alber; Axel Bauer; Rudolf Berger; Günter Christ; Matthias Frick; Uta C Hoppe; Kurt Huber; Gudrun Lamm; Elisabeth Laßnig; Dirk von Lewinski; Anna Rab; Franz X Roithinger; Herwig Schuchlenz; Peter Siostrzonek; Johann Sipötz; Thomas Stefenelli; Clemens Steinwender; Michael Edlinger; Franz Weidinger
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2021-06

Review 3.  Transradial versus transfemoral approach for diagnostic coronary angiography and percutaneous coronary intervention in people with coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Ahmed A Kolkailah; Rabah S Alreshq; Ahmed M Muhammed; Mohamed E Zahran; Marwah Anas El-Wegoud; Ashraf F Nabhan
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-04-18

4.  CVIT expert consensus document on primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in 2018.

Authors:  Yukio Ozaki; Yuki Katagiri; Yoshinobu Onuma; Tetsuya Amano; Takashi Muramatsu; Ken Kozuma; Satoru Otsuji; Takafumi Ueno; Nobuo Shiode; Kazuya Kawai; Nobuhiro Tanaka; Kinzo Ueda; Takashi Akasaka; Keiichi Igarashi Hanaoka; Shiro Uemura; Hirotaka Oda; Yoshiaki Katahira; Kazushige Kadota; Eisho Kyo; Katsuhiko Sato; Tadaya Sato; Junya Shite; Koichi Nakao; Masami Nishino; Yutaka Hikichi; Junko Honye; Tetsuo Matsubara; Sumio Mizuno; Toshiya Muramatsu; Taku Inohara; Shun Kohsaka; Ichiro Michishita; Hiroyoshi Yokoi; Patrick W Serruys; Yuji Ikari; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  Cardiovasc Interv Ther       Date:  2018-03-29

5.  Bleeding Severity in Percutaneous Coronary Intervention (PCI) and Its Impact on Short-Term Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Shashank Murali; Sara Vogrin; Samer Noaman; Diem T Dinh; Angela L Brennan; Jeffrey Lefkovits; Christopher M Reid; Nicholas Cox; William Chan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-05-11       Impact factor: 4.241

6.  Glycoprotein IIb/IIIa Inhibitors May Modulate the Clinical Benefit of Radial Access as Compared to Femoral Access in Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Meta-Regression and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials.

Authors:  Stefano Rigattieri; Ernesto Cristiano; Francesca Giovannelli; Antonella Tommasino; Francesco Cava; Barbara Citoni; Domenico Maria Zardi; Andrea Berni; Massimo Volpe
Journal:  J Interv Cardiol       Date:  2021-06-15       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 7.  Continuum of Care for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Optimizing Treatment for ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction and Non-St-Elevation Acute Coronary Syndrome.

Authors:  W Brian Gibler; Judy M Racadio; Amy L Hirsch; Todd W Roat
Journal:  Crit Pathw Cardiol       Date:  2018-09

8.  Cangrelor Induces More Potent Platelet Inhibition without Increasing Bleeding in Resuscitated Patients.

Authors:  Florian Prüller; Lukasz Bis; Oliver Leopold Milke; Friedrich Fruhwald; Sascha Pätzold; Siegfried Altmanninger-Sock; Jolanta Siller-Matula; Friederike von Lewinski; Klemens Ablasser; Michael Sacherer; Dirk von Lewinski
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2018-11-15       Impact factor: 4.241

9.  Transradial intervention as the first choice of treatment for ST elevation myocardial infarction patients: editorial comment.

Authors:  Byoung Kwon Lee
Journal:  Korean J Intern Med       Date:  2018-06-28       Impact factor: 2.884

10.  Acute kidney injury in patients with myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention using radial versus femoral access.

Authors:  Vojko Kanic; Gregor Kompara; David Šuran; Alojz Tapajner; Franjo Husam Naji; Andreja Sinkovic
Journal:  BMC Nephrol       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 2.388

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.