| Literature DB >> 28328530 |
Isabela Leite Pezzuti1, Adriana Maria Kakehasi2, Maria Tereza Filgueiras3, Juliana Albano de Guimarães4, Isabela Alves Campos de Lacerda4, Ivani Novato Silva5.
Abstract
The objective of the work was to prepare an update on imaging methods for bone evaluation during childhood and adolescence. The text was based on original and review articles on imaging methods for clinical evaluation of bone mass in children and adolescents up to 20 years old. They were selected from BIREME and PUBMED by means of the following keywords: bone density; osteoporosis/diagnosis; densitometry; tomography; ultrasonography; magnetic resonance imaging; and radiogrammetry and published in Portuguese or English, in the last 10 years (2006-2016). The article was organized into topics with the description of peculiarities, advantages and disadvantages of each imaging method and their possible clinical applicability. Despite the emergence of new technologies, dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) remains the gold standard method for low bone mass diagnosis in all age groups. However, interpretation is complex in children and adolescents and demands skilled people. Quantitative computed tomography (QCT) [central QCT, peripheral QCT (pQCT) and high resolution-pQCT (HR-pQCT)] and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) evaluate real bone density, but are not yet available for routine use. Quantitative bone ultrasound (QUS) shows good perspectives for its use in primary prevention actions. Automated radiogrammetry shows promise as a method able to flag individuals who might benefit from a complete bone assessment, but the clinical value of the measures still needs to be established.Entities:
Keywords: bone density; children; densitometry; magnetic resonance imaging; osteoporosis/diagnosis; radiogrammetry; tomography; ultrasonography
Mesh:
Year: 2017 PMID: 28328530 DOI: 10.1515/jpem-2016-0252
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Pediatr Endocrinol Metab ISSN: 0334-018X Impact factor: 1.634