Literature DB >> 28328120

A qualitative study of adolescents' understanding of biobanks and their attitudes toward participation, re-contact, and data sharing.

Andrea M Murad1,2, Melanie F Myers1,2, Susan D Thompson2,3, Rachel Fisher1,2, Armand H Matheny Antommaria2,4.   

Abstract

While biobanks have become more prevalent, little is known about adolescents' views of key governance issues. We conducted semi-structured interviews with adolescents between 15 and 17 years old to solicit their views. All interviews were audiotaped and transcribed. Two investigators coded the transcripts and resolved any discrepancies through consensus. We conducted 18 interviews before reaching data saturation. Four participants (22%) had previously heard of a biobank. Many participants had misunderstandings about biobanks, some of which persisted after education. Participants believed that enrolling in a biobank would benefit others through scientific research. Many study participants were unable to identify risks of biobank participation. Thirteen participants (72%) were willing to enroll in a biobank and only one (6%) initially was not. Participants believed that if they were unable to provide assent when enrolled, then they should be re-contacted at the age of majority and their data should not be shared until that time. Participants emphasized the importance of being aware of their enrollment and the possibility of disagreeing with their parents. Participants' misunderstanding of biobanks suggests that assent may not be adequately informed without additional education. While adolescents had positive attitudes toward biobanks, they emphasized the importance of awareness of and involvement in the decision to enroll.
© 2017 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  adolescent; biological specimen banks; genetic research; information dissemination; informed consent

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28328120     DOI: 10.1002/ajmg.a.38114

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Med Genet A        ISSN: 1552-4825            Impact factor:   2.802


  8 in total

1.  Adolescent and Parental Attitudes About Return of Genomic Research Results: Focus Group Findings Regarding Decisional Preferences.

Authors:  Michelle L McGowan; Cynthia A Prows; Melissa DeJonckheere; William B Brinkman; Lisa Vaughn; Melanie F Myers
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-05-28       Impact factor: 1.742

2.  Biobanking in the Pediatric Critical Care Setting: Adolescent/Young Adult Perspectives.

Authors:  Erin D Paquette; Sabrina F Derrington; Avani Shukla; Neha Sinha; Sarah Oswald; Lauren Sorce; Kelly N Michelson
Journal:  J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 1.742

3.  Motives of contributing personal data for health research: (non-)participation in a Dutch biobank.

Authors:  R Broekstra; E L M Maeckelberghe; J L Aris-Meijer; R P Stolk; S Otten
Journal:  BMC Med Ethics       Date:  2020-07-25       Impact factor: 2.652

4.  Determinants of the willingness to participate in biobanking among Malaysian stakeholders in the Klang Valley.

Authors:  Latifah Amin; Hasrizul Hashim; Zurina Mahadi; Khaidzir Ismail
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2018-12-05       Impact factor: 4.615

5.  Data in question: A survey of European biobank professionals on ethical, legal and societal challenges of biobank research.

Authors:  Melanie Goisauf; Gillian Martin; Heidi Beate Bentzen; Isabelle Budin-Ljøsne; Lars Ursin; Anna Durnová; Liis Leitsalu; Katharine Smith; Sara Casati; Marialuisa Lavitrano; Deborah Mascalzoni; Martin Boeckhout; Michaela Th Mayrhofer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-09-18       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Banking the Future: Adolescent Capacity to Consent to Biobank Research.

Authors:  Kyle A McGregor; Mary A Ott
Journal:  Ethics Hum Res       Date:  2019-07

Review 7.  Adolescent Assent and Reconsent for Biobanking: Recent Developments and Emerging Ethical Issues.

Authors:  T J Kasperbauer; Colin Halverson
Journal:  Front Med (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-07-09

8.  Pediatric biorepository participation during the COVID-19 pandemic: predictors of enrollment and biospecimen donation.

Authors:  Anne M Neilan; Anisha Tyagi; Yao Tong; Eva J Farkas; Madeleine D Burns; Allison Fialkowski; Grace Park; Margot Hardcastle; Elizabeth Gootkind; Ingrid V Bassett; Fatma M Shebl; Lael M Yonker
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2022-03-12       Impact factor: 2.125

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.