Literature DB >> 28326148

Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.

.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A patient safety learning system (sometimes called a critical incident reporting system) refers to structured reporting, collation, and analysis of critical incidents. To inform a provincial working group's recommendations for an Ontario Patient Safety Event Learning System, a systematic review was undertaken to determine design features that would optimize its adoption into the health care system and would inform implementation strategies.
METHODS: The objective of this review was to address two research questions: (a) what are the barriers to and facilitators of successful adoption of a patient safety learning system reported by health professionals and (b) what design components maximize successful adoption and implementation? To answer the first question, we used a published systematic review. To answer the second question, we used scoping study methodology.
RESULTS: Common barriers reported in the literature by health care professionals included fear of blame, legal penalties, the perception that incident reporting does not improve patient safety, lack of organizational support, inadequate feedback, lack of knowledge about incident reporting systems, and lack of understanding about what constitutes an error. Common facilitators included a non-accusatory environment, the perception that incident reporting improves safety, clarification of the route of reporting and of how the system uses reports, enhanced feedback, role models (such as managers) using and promoting reporting, legislated protection of those who report, ability to report anonymously, education and training opportunities, and clear guidelines on what to report. Components of a patient safety learning system that increased successful adoption and implementation were emphasis on a blame-free culture that encourages reporting and learning, clear guidelines on how and what to report, making sure the system is user-friendly, organizational development support for data analysis to generate meaningful learning outcomes, and multiple mechanisms to provide feedback through routes to reporters and the wider community (local meetings, email alerts, bulletins, paper contributions, etc.).
CONCLUSIONS: The design of a patient safety learning system can be optimized by an awareness of the barriers to and facilitators of successful adoption and implementation identified by health care professionals. Evaluation of the effectiveness of a patient safety learning system is needed to refine its design.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2017        PMID: 28326148      PMCID: PMC5357133     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser        ISSN: 1915-7398


  28 in total

1.  Physician perception of hospital safety and barriers to incident reporting.

Authors:  Joel M Schectman; Margaret L Plews-Ogan
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2006-06

Review 2.  Feedback from incident reporting: information and action to improve patient safety.

Authors:  J Benn; M Koutantji; L Wallace; P Spurgeon; M Rejman; A Healey; C Vincent
Journal:  Qual Saf Health Care       Date:  2009-02

3.  National critical incident reporting systems relevant to anaesthesia: a European survey.

Authors:  S Reed; D Arnal; O Frank; J I Gomez-Arnau; J Hansen; O Lester; K L Mikkelsen; T Rhaiem; P H Rosenberg; M St Pierre; A Schleppers; S Staender; A F Smith
Journal:  Br J Anaesth       Date:  2013-12-05       Impact factor: 9.166

4.  Barriers to and incentives for safety event reporting in emergency departments.

Authors:  Jeffrey R Brubacher; Garth S Hunte; Lynsey Hamilton; Annemarie Taylor
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2011

5.  Reporting, learning and the culture of safety.

Authors:  W Ward Flemons; Glenn McRae
Journal:  Healthc Q       Date:  2012

6.  The development of the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales, 2001-2005.

Authors:  Susan K Williams; Sue S Osborn
Journal:  Med J Aust       Date:  2006-05-15       Impact factor: 7.738

Review 7.  Critical incident reporting systems.

Authors:  Jag Ahluwalia; Lin Marriott
Journal:  Semin Fetal Neonatal Med       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.926

8.  Lessons learnt from the development of the Patient Safety Incidents Reporting an Learning System for the Spanish National Health System: SiNASP.

Authors:  Paula Vallejo-Gutiérrez; Joaquim Bañeres-Amella; Eduardo Sierra; Jesús Casal; Yolanda Agra
Journal:  Rev Calid Asist       Date:  2013-11-09

9.  A survey of British Columbia anesthesiologists on a provincial critical incident reporting program.

Authors:  Richard N Merchant; Patricia M Gully
Journal:  Can J Anaesth       Date:  2005 Aug-Sep       Impact factor: 5.063

10.  Development of AMSTAR: a measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews.

Authors:  Beverley J Shea; Jeremy M Grimshaw; George A Wells; Maarten Boers; Neil Andersson; Candyce Hamel; Ashley C Porter; Peter Tugwell; David Moher; Lex M Bouter
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2007-02-15       Impact factor: 4.615

View more
  11 in total

1.  Traditional Lectures Actually Improve the Body of Knowledge, Skills, and Attitudes of Health Care Professional for Health Incident Reporting System.

Authors:  Marcus Vinicius de Souza Joao Luiz; Fabiana Rossi Varallo; Celsa Raquel Villaverde Melgarejo; Tales Rubens de Nadai; Patricia de Carvalho Mastroianni
Journal:  Hosp Pharm       Date:  2020-05-04

Review 2.  Key strategies to improve systems for managing patient complaints within health facilities - what can we learn from the existing literature?

Authors:  Tolib Mirzoev; Sumit Kane
Journal:  Glob Health Action       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 2.640

3.  Culture of Blame-An Ongoing Burden for Doctors and Patient Safety.

Authors:  Ognjen Brborović; Hana Brborović; Iskra Alexandra Nola; Milan Milošević
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-12-01       Impact factor: 4.614

4.  Enabling patient safety awareness using the Green Cross method: A qualitative description of users' experience.

Authors:  Anneli Schwarz; Stina Isaksson; Ulrika Källman; Marie Rusner
Journal:  J Clin Nurs       Date:  2021-01-17       Impact factor: 3.036

5.  Clinical incident reporting behaviors and associated factors among health professionals in Dessie comprehensive specialized hospital, Amhara Region, Ethiopia: a mixed method study.

Authors:  Zemen Mengesha Yalew; Yibeltal Asmamaw Yitayew
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2021-12-11       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Implementation strategies for the patient safety reporting system using Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research: a retrospective mixed-method analysis.

Authors:  Daisuke Koike; Masahiro Ito; Akihiko Horiguchi; Hiroshi Yatsuya; Atsuhiko Ota
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-28       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Medical Students' Insights Towards Patient Safety.

Authors:  Saeed Alshahrani; Ahmad Alswaidan; Ala Alkharaan; Abdulrahman Alfawzan; Aysha Alshahrani; Emad Masuadi; Awad Alshahrani
Journal:  Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J       Date:  2021-06-21

8.  Patient safety management systems and activities related to promoting voluntary in-hospital reporting and mandatory national-level reporting for patient safety issues: A cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Shigeru Fujita; Kanako Seto; Yosuke Hatakeyama; Ryo Onishi; Kunichika Matsumoto; Yoji Nagai; Shuhei Iida; Tomohiro Hirao; Junko Ayuzawa; Yoshiko Shimamori; Tomonori Hasegawa
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  An International Perspective on Definitions and Terminology Used to Describe Serious Reportable Patient Safety Incidents: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Josephine Hegarty; Sarah Jane Flaherty; Mohamad M Saab; John Goodwin; Nuala Walshe; Teresa Wills; Vera J C McCarthy; Siobhan Murphy; Alana Cutliffe; Elaine Meehan; Ciara Landers; Elaine Lehane; Aoife Lane; Margaret Landers; Caroline Kilty; Deirdre Madden; Mary Tumelty; Corina Naughton
Journal:  J Patient Saf       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 2.243

Review 10.  Measuring and monitoring perioperative patient safety: a basic approach for clinicians.

Authors:  Johannes Wacker
Journal:  Curr Opin Anaesthesiol       Date:  2020-12       Impact factor: 2.733

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.