Literature DB >> 16719740

The development of the National Reporting and Learning System in England and Wales, 2001-2005.

Susan K Williams1, Sue S Osborn.   

Abstract

In 2001, the National Patient Safety Agency (NPSA) was created as part of a wider reform process to improve quality of care for patients in the National Health Services of England and Wales. The NPSA was charged with developing and implementing a national system for collecting and learning from reported patient safety incidents. Between 2003 and 2005, 303 447 incidents were reported from a wide range of health care settings. As a result, a range of interventions have been developed to improve safety. A number of lessons have been distilled from the experience of England and Wales, including that: clinical risk management system characteristics should be aligned with those of the national reporting system; and safety culture and information dissemination must be addressed at the same time as any new reporting system is implemented. These lessons should be of use to other countries implementing similar patient safety strategies.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2006        PMID: 16719740     DOI: 10.5694/j.1326-5377.2006.tb00366.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med J Aust        ISSN: 0025-729X            Impact factor:   7.738


  12 in total

1.  Midazolam use for dental conscious sedation: how safe are we?

Authors:  Z Shehabi; C Flood; L Matthew
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 1.626

Review 2.  Patient Safety Learning Systems: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.

Authors: 
Journal:  Ont Health Technol Assess Ser       Date:  2017-03-01

3.  Likelihood of reporting medication errors in hospitalized children: a survey of nurses and physicians.

Authors:  Rikke Mie Rishoej; Jesper Hallas; Lene Juel Kjeldsen; Henrik Thybo Christesen; Anna Birna Almarsdóttir
Journal:  Ther Adv Drug Saf       Date:  2017-12-22

4.  Major sources of critical incidents in intensive care.

Authors:  Ingeborg D Welters; James Gibson; Martin Mogk; Richard Wenstone
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-09-29       Impact factor: 9.097

5.  Attitudes and perceived barriers of tertiary level health professionals towards incident reporting in Pakistan.

Authors:  Muhammad Raees Malik; Ali Yawar Alam; Azeem Sultan Mir; Ghulam Mustafa Malik; Syed Muslim Abbas
Journal:  N Am J Med Sci       Date:  2010-02

6.  What is the risk of death or severe harm due to bone cement implantation syndrome among patients undergoing hip hemiarthroplasty for fractured neck of femur? A patient safety surveillance study.

Authors:  Paul D Rutter; Sukhmeet S Panesar; Ara Darzi; Liam J Donaldson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-06-12       Impact factor: 2.692

7.  Patient safety culture in China: a case study in an outpatient setting in Beijing.

Authors:  Chaojie Liu; Weiwei Liu; Yuanyuan Wang; Zhihong Zhang; Peng Wang
Journal:  BMJ Qual Saf       Date:  2013-12-18       Impact factor: 7.035

8.  Electronic clinical safety reporting system: a benefits evaluation.

Authors:  Pamela Elliott; Desmond Martin; Doreen Neville
Journal:  JMIR Med Inform       Date:  2014-06-11

9.  Can Patient Safety Incident Reports Be Used to Compare Hospital Safety? Results from a Quantitative Analysis of the English National Reporting and Learning System Data.

Authors:  Ann-Marie Howell; Elaine M Burns; George Bouras; Liam J Donaldson; Thanos Athanasiou; Ara Darzi
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  Code development of the national hemovigilance system and expansion strategies for hospital blood banks.

Authors:  Kim Jeongeun; Kim Sukwha; Han Kyusup; Lee Kyungsoon
Journal:  Asian J Transfus Sci       Date:  2012-07
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.